通用航空飞行员在复杂空域飞行时如何选择航线?

IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED International Journal of Aerospace Psychology Pub Date : 2019-04-03 DOI:10.1080/24721840.2019.1596744
Elena Psyllou, A. Majumdar
{"title":"通用航空飞行员在复杂空域飞行时如何选择航线?","authors":"Elena Psyllou, A. Majumdar","doi":"10.1080/24721840.2019.1596744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: This study is an analysis of the planning of general aviation (GA) pilots and its impact on airspace infringements. Background: Past studies identified the contribution of inadequate flight planning to airspace infringements in Europe, but without any discussion relating to the processes involved and their shortcomings. This article, therefore, examines the flight route decision making of GA pilots. Method: Twenty-seven recreational GA pilots who flew an airplane, glider, or ultralight aircraft were interviewed using semistructured interviews in Finland, Norway, and the United Kingdom. These nations experienced a relatively high number of reported airspace infringements. Interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: The results showed that GA pilots planned a route near controlled or restricted airspace especially in areas with small uncontrolled airspace. This decision was typical for GA pilots who were based in the capitals of the European nations. The selected flight path and altitude were influenced by factors related to the pilot (e.g., risk management) and the airspace design (e.g., low lower boundary of controlled airspace). Pilots who were aware of the risk of straying into airspace while flying such a route considered mitigation measures, such as cross-checking the aircraft’s position frequently. Conclusion: Such findings can address airspace infringements by encouraging pilots to take mitigation actions while flying such a route, including flying at a greater distance from the airspace.","PeriodicalId":41693,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Aerospace Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24721840.2019.1596744","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Do General Aviation Pilots Choose Their Route When Flying in Complex Airspace?\",\"authors\":\"Elena Psyllou, A. Majumdar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24721840.2019.1596744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Objective: This study is an analysis of the planning of general aviation (GA) pilots and its impact on airspace infringements. Background: Past studies identified the contribution of inadequate flight planning to airspace infringements in Europe, but without any discussion relating to the processes involved and their shortcomings. This article, therefore, examines the flight route decision making of GA pilots. Method: Twenty-seven recreational GA pilots who flew an airplane, glider, or ultralight aircraft were interviewed using semistructured interviews in Finland, Norway, and the United Kingdom. These nations experienced a relatively high number of reported airspace infringements. Interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: The results showed that GA pilots planned a route near controlled or restricted airspace especially in areas with small uncontrolled airspace. This decision was typical for GA pilots who were based in the capitals of the European nations. The selected flight path and altitude were influenced by factors related to the pilot (e.g., risk management) and the airspace design (e.g., low lower boundary of controlled airspace). Pilots who were aware of the risk of straying into airspace while flying such a route considered mitigation measures, such as cross-checking the aircraft’s position frequently. Conclusion: Such findings can address airspace infringements by encouraging pilots to take mitigation actions while flying such a route, including flying at a greater distance from the airspace.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Aerospace Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24721840.2019.1596744\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Aerospace Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24721840.2019.1596744\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Aerospace Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24721840.2019.1596744","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要目的:分析通用航空(GA)飞行员的规划行为及其对空域侵权行为的影响。背景:过去的研究确定了不充分的飞行计划对欧洲领空侵犯的贡献,但没有讨论所涉及的过程及其缺点。因此,本文考察了通用航空飞行员的航路决策。方法:在芬兰、挪威和英国对27名驾驶飞机、滑翔机或超轻型飞机的业余GA飞行员进行半结构化访谈。这些国家报告的侵犯领空事件相对较多。访谈记录采用主题分析进行分析。结果:GA飞行员在管制空域或限制空域附近规划航路,特别是在管制空域较小的区域。这个决定对于总部设在欧洲国家首都的通用航空飞行员来说是很典型的。所选择的飞行路径和飞行高度受到与飞行员有关的因素(如风险管理)和空域设计(如管制空域低下限)的影响。意识到在飞行这种航线时误入空域的风险的飞行员考虑了缓解措施,例如经常交叉检查飞机的位置。结论:这些发现可以通过鼓励飞行员在飞行此类航线时采取缓解行动,包括在距离空域更远的地方飞行,来解决空域侵权问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Do General Aviation Pilots Choose Their Route When Flying in Complex Airspace?
ABSTRACT Objective: This study is an analysis of the planning of general aviation (GA) pilots and its impact on airspace infringements. Background: Past studies identified the contribution of inadequate flight planning to airspace infringements in Europe, but without any discussion relating to the processes involved and their shortcomings. This article, therefore, examines the flight route decision making of GA pilots. Method: Twenty-seven recreational GA pilots who flew an airplane, glider, or ultralight aircraft were interviewed using semistructured interviews in Finland, Norway, and the United Kingdom. These nations experienced a relatively high number of reported airspace infringements. Interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: The results showed that GA pilots planned a route near controlled or restricted airspace especially in areas with small uncontrolled airspace. This decision was typical for GA pilots who were based in the capitals of the European nations. The selected flight path and altitude were influenced by factors related to the pilot (e.g., risk management) and the airspace design (e.g., low lower boundary of controlled airspace). Pilots who were aware of the risk of straying into airspace while flying such a route considered mitigation measures, such as cross-checking the aircraft’s position frequently. Conclusion: Such findings can address airspace infringements by encouraging pilots to take mitigation actions while flying such a route, including flying at a greater distance from the airspace.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Qualitative Analysis of General Aviation Pilots’ Aviation Safety Reporting System Incident Narratives Using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Effective Monitoring for Early Detection of Hypoxia in Fighter Pilots The Effects of Aeronautical Decision-Making Models on Student Pilots’ Situational Awareness and Cognitive Workload in Simulated Non-Normal Flight Deck Environment The Relationship between Preparation, Impression Management, and Interview Performance in High-Stakes Personnel Selection: A Field Study of Airline Pilot Applicants It Was This Wing Wasn’t It? Identifying the Importance of Verbal Communication in Aviation Maintenance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1