大斑鹰Clanga Clanga、小斑鹰Clanga pomarina及种间杂交的飞羽形态学鉴定

IF 0.7 4区 生物学 Q3 ORNITHOLOGY Bird Study Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1080/00063657.2023.2244739
Freddy Rohtla, Ü. Väli
{"title":"大斑鹰Clanga Clanga、小斑鹰Clanga pomarina及种间杂交的飞羽形态学鉴定","authors":"Freddy Rohtla, Ü. Väli","doi":"10.1080/00063657.2023.2244739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Capsule Shed feathers can be used for the field identification of the Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga clanga and Lesser Spotted Eagle Clanga pomarina, but identification of hybrids is problematic. Aims To provide an easy method for distinguishing the shed flight feathers of the Greater Spotted Eagle, Lesser Spotted Eagle, and their hybrids. Methods We examined seven morphological characteristics and developed multinomial logistic regression models to aid in identification of feathers. Results The most informative feature was the relative feather length. Barring improved the identification of tail feathers, secondaries, and proximal primaries. Feathers of Lesser Spotted Eagles were significantly shorter and more barred than those of Greater Spotted Eagles. Feathers of hybrids were also highly barred but had an intermediate length. The length from the tip to notch, width of the notch, and specific colouration patterns were also included in the best models for specific feather types. The combination of these characteristics resulted in identification accuracies of 89–97% for Lesser Spotted Eagle feathers and 80–100% for Greater Spotted Eagle feathers. However, all F1-hybrids were incorrectly identified as Greater Spotted or Lesser Spotted Eagles. Conclusion Shed feathers could have potential for the non-invasive field identification of spotted eagle species at nest sites. However, the identification of hybrids based on feathers is difficult due to substantial morphological variation and overlap with parent species.","PeriodicalId":55353,"journal":{"name":"Bird Study","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of the Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga clanga, Lesser Spotted Eagle Clanga pomarina and interspecific hybrids using the morphology of shed flight feathers\",\"authors\":\"Freddy Rohtla, Ü. Väli\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00063657.2023.2244739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Capsule Shed feathers can be used for the field identification of the Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga clanga and Lesser Spotted Eagle Clanga pomarina, but identification of hybrids is problematic. Aims To provide an easy method for distinguishing the shed flight feathers of the Greater Spotted Eagle, Lesser Spotted Eagle, and their hybrids. Methods We examined seven morphological characteristics and developed multinomial logistic regression models to aid in identification of feathers. Results The most informative feature was the relative feather length. Barring improved the identification of tail feathers, secondaries, and proximal primaries. Feathers of Lesser Spotted Eagles were significantly shorter and more barred than those of Greater Spotted Eagles. Feathers of hybrids were also highly barred but had an intermediate length. The length from the tip to notch, width of the notch, and specific colouration patterns were also included in the best models for specific feather types. The combination of these characteristics resulted in identification accuracies of 89–97% for Lesser Spotted Eagle feathers and 80–100% for Greater Spotted Eagle feathers. However, all F1-hybrids were incorrectly identified as Greater Spotted or Lesser Spotted Eagles. Conclusion Shed feathers could have potential for the non-invasive field identification of spotted eagle species at nest sites. However, the identification of hybrids based on feathers is difficult due to substantial morphological variation and overlap with parent species.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bird Study\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bird Study\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2023.2244739\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORNITHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bird Study","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2023.2244739","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORNITHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

荚膜羽可用于大斑鹰(Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga Clanga)和小斑鹰(Lesser Spotted Eagle Clanga pomarina)的野外鉴定,但杂交鉴定存在问题。目的提供一种简单的方法来区分大斑点鹰、小斑点鹰及其杂交品种的脱落飞行羽毛。方法研究了羽毛的7种形态特征,建立了多项逻辑回归模型,以帮助鉴定羽毛。结果相对羽长是最具信息量的特征。除非改进对尾羽、次羽和近端初级羽的识别。与大斑鹰相比,小斑鹰的羽毛明显更短,条纹更多。杂交种的羽毛也有高度的条纹,但长度适中。从尖端到缺口的长度,缺口的宽度和特定的颜色模式也包括在特定羽毛类型的最佳模型中。这些特征的结合导致小斑鹰羽毛的识别准确率为89-97%,大斑鹰羽毛的识别准确率为80-100%。然而,所有f1杂交品种都被错误地识别为大斑点鹰或小斑点鹰。结论毛羽具有非侵入性现场鉴定的潜力。然而,由于与亲本物种有很大的形态差异和重叠,基于羽毛的杂交品种的鉴定是困难的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identification of the Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga clanga, Lesser Spotted Eagle Clanga pomarina and interspecific hybrids using the morphology of shed flight feathers
ABSTRACT Capsule Shed feathers can be used for the field identification of the Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga clanga and Lesser Spotted Eagle Clanga pomarina, but identification of hybrids is problematic. Aims To provide an easy method for distinguishing the shed flight feathers of the Greater Spotted Eagle, Lesser Spotted Eagle, and their hybrids. Methods We examined seven morphological characteristics and developed multinomial logistic regression models to aid in identification of feathers. Results The most informative feature was the relative feather length. Barring improved the identification of tail feathers, secondaries, and proximal primaries. Feathers of Lesser Spotted Eagles were significantly shorter and more barred than those of Greater Spotted Eagles. Feathers of hybrids were also highly barred but had an intermediate length. The length from the tip to notch, width of the notch, and specific colouration patterns were also included in the best models for specific feather types. The combination of these characteristics resulted in identification accuracies of 89–97% for Lesser Spotted Eagle feathers and 80–100% for Greater Spotted Eagle feathers. However, all F1-hybrids were incorrectly identified as Greater Spotted or Lesser Spotted Eagles. Conclusion Shed feathers could have potential for the non-invasive field identification of spotted eagle species at nest sites. However, the identification of hybrids based on feathers is difficult due to substantial morphological variation and overlap with parent species.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bird Study
Bird Study 生物-鸟类学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bird Study publishes high quality papers relevant to the sphere of interest of the British Trust for Ornithology: broadly defined as field ornithology; especially when related to evidence-based bird conservation. Papers are especially welcome on: patterns of distribution and abundance, movements, habitat preferences, developing field census methods, ringing and other techniques for marking and tracking birds. Bird Study concentrates on birds that occur in the Western Palearctic. This includes research on their biology outside of the Western Palearctic, for example on wintering grounds in Africa. Bird Study also welcomes papers from any part of the world if they are of general interest to the broad areas of investigation outlined above. Bird Study publishes the following types of articles: -Original research papers of any length -Short original research papers (less than 2500 words in length) -Scientific reviews -Forum articles covering general ornithological issues, including non-scientific ones -Short feedback articles that make scientific criticisms of papers published recently in the Journal.
期刊最新文献
Morphometric differences between sexes and populations in Norwegian Dunlins Calidris alpina Habitat preferences of breeding Eurasian Sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus in Central Europe Breeding Common Scoters Melanitta nigra in Scotland’s Flow Country: a population in decline despite productivity being stable An investigation of the insect component in the diet of the Grey Heron Ardea cinerea and Little Egret Egretta garzetta Environmental correlates of Whinchat Saxicola rubetra breeding territory retention in a declining upland population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1