US-situs基金会

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW Trusts & Trustees Pub Date : 2021-08-18 DOI:10.1093/tandt/ttab065
T. D. Mayo, Amy M. Staehr, Von Sanborn
{"title":"US-situs基金会","authors":"T. D. Mayo, Amy M. Staehr, Von Sanborn","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttab065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the United States, two states that have been at the vanguard of developing and enacting modern trust laws—New Hampshire and Wyoming—have recently enacted laws allowing foundations. For families seeking a US-situs foundation, both states provide similar, well-developed statutory regimes for foundations. The statutes have many common elements. One such element is the flexibility that families have when designing foundations. While that flexibility should enable most families to achieve their objectives in either state, some families may find that one state’s statutory regime is better suited to their particular situation and objectives. The present article presents the reader with a detailed comparative outline of the New Hampshire and Wyoming foundation laws.","PeriodicalId":43396,"journal":{"name":"Trusts & Trustees","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"US-situs foundations\",\"authors\":\"T. D. Mayo, Amy M. Staehr, Von Sanborn\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tandt/ttab065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In the United States, two states that have been at the vanguard of developing and enacting modern trust laws—New Hampshire and Wyoming—have recently enacted laws allowing foundations. For families seeking a US-situs foundation, both states provide similar, well-developed statutory regimes for foundations. The statutes have many common elements. One such element is the flexibility that families have when designing foundations. While that flexibility should enable most families to achieve their objectives in either state, some families may find that one state’s statutory regime is better suited to their particular situation and objectives. The present article presents the reader with a detailed comparative outline of the New Hampshire and Wyoming foundation laws.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttab065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trusts & Trustees","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttab065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,在制定和颁布现代信托法方面走在前列的两个州——新罕布什尔州和怀俄明州——最近颁布了允许设立基金会的法律。对于寻求美国本土基金会的家庭,这两个州都为基金会提供了类似的、完善的法律制度。这些法规有许多共同的要素。其中一个因素是家庭在设计地基时的灵活性。虽然这种灵活性应使大多数家庭能够在任何一个州实现其目标,但有些家庭可能会发现,一个州的法定制度更适合他们的特殊情况和目标。本文向读者介绍了新罕布什尔州和怀俄明州基金会法律的详细比较大纲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
US-situs foundations
In the United States, two states that have been at the vanguard of developing and enacting modern trust laws—New Hampshire and Wyoming—have recently enacted laws allowing foundations. For families seeking a US-situs foundation, both states provide similar, well-developed statutory regimes for foundations. The statutes have many common elements. One such element is the flexibility that families have when designing foundations. While that flexibility should enable most families to achieve their objectives in either state, some families may find that one state’s statutory regime is better suited to their particular situation and objectives. The present article presents the reader with a detailed comparative outline of the New Hampshire and Wyoming foundation laws.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
92
期刊最新文献
CC14 guidance update: greener investments, greater uncertainty? Australian tax arrangements for trusts: Section 100A of the Income Tax Assessment Act (1936) Cth Fathers, daughters, and matters of trust In brief An analysis of the risks that arise for discretionary trust settlements in the event of a divorce: to what extent does the Family Court’s asset division approach undermine discretionary trusts?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1