冒着重蹈覆辙的风险:《女人》中的阅读种族、参考和语法

IF 0.2 4区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM Pub Date : 2022-07-14 DOI:10.1353/dia.2021.0022
Christina A. León
{"title":"冒着重蹈覆辙的风险:《女人》中的阅读种族、参考和语法","authors":"Christina A. León","doi":"10.1353/dia.2021.0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay reconsiders the deconstructive claim that political terms, and specifically the term woman, are catachrestic. By tracing genealogies of rhetoric in deconstruction and grammar and representation in Black feminisms, I show how racial categories overdetermine reference. In order to address this vis-à-vis feminist theories that employ deconstructive, poststructural, transnational, or critical Black analytics, I trace conversations around catachresis and how these theoretical insights might afford a rhetorical concept that has no literal referent but emerges from lack and need. Thinking in this tension that better attends to the material conditions of those considered as referent, the risk of catachresis offers one possible way to think at the limit of the term woman with an attention to ethics in theory.","PeriodicalId":46840,"journal":{"name":"DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risking Catachresis: Reading Race, Reference, and Grammar in “Women”\",\"authors\":\"Christina A. León\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/dia.2021.0022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This essay reconsiders the deconstructive claim that political terms, and specifically the term woman, are catachrestic. By tracing genealogies of rhetoric in deconstruction and grammar and representation in Black feminisms, I show how racial categories overdetermine reference. In order to address this vis-à-vis feminist theories that employ deconstructive, poststructural, transnational, or critical Black analytics, I trace conversations around catachresis and how these theoretical insights might afford a rhetorical concept that has no literal referent but emerges from lack and need. Thinking in this tension that better attends to the material conditions of those considered as referent, the risk of catachresis offers one possible way to think at the limit of the term woman with an attention to ethics in theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/dia.2021.0022\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/dia.2021.0022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:这篇文章重新考虑了解构性的说法,即政治术语,特别是女性术语,是灾难性的。通过追溯解构中的修辞谱系、黑人女性主义中的语法和表现,我展示了种族类别是如何过度确定参照的。为了解决这种与女权主义理论的对比,这些理论采用了解构、后结构、跨国或批判性的黑人分析,我追踪了围绕catachresis的对话,以及这些理论见解如何提供一个没有字面参照但因缺乏和需要而产生的修辞概念。在这种更关注被视为参照物的人的物质条件的紧张关系中思考,卡塔克里斯的风险提供了一种可能的方式,可以在理论上关注伦理,在女性这个词的极限下思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risking Catachresis: Reading Race, Reference, and Grammar in “Women”
Abstract:This essay reconsiders the deconstructive claim that political terms, and specifically the term woman, are catachrestic. By tracing genealogies of rhetoric in deconstruction and grammar and representation in Black feminisms, I show how racial categories overdetermine reference. In order to address this vis-à-vis feminist theories that employ deconstructive, poststructural, transnational, or critical Black analytics, I trace conversations around catachresis and how these theoretical insights might afford a rhetorical concept that has no literal referent but emerges from lack and need. Thinking in this tension that better attends to the material conditions of those considered as referent, the risk of catachresis offers one possible way to think at the limit of the term woman with an attention to ethics in theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM
DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: For over thirty years, diacritics has been an exceptional and influential forum for scholars writing on the problems of literary criticism. Each issue features articles in which contributors compare and analyze books on particular theoretical works and develop their own positions on the theses, methods, and theoretical implications of those works.
期刊最新文献
Heidegger Tonight: A Philosophical Dialogue Fascination With The Obscure: An Interview With Peter Trawny Rethinking Authenticity, Anarchy, and Collective Action: An Interview with Peg Birmingham Object-Oriented Heidegger: An Interview with Graham Harman Crossroads in the Flesh: An Interview with Mariana Ortega
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1