制定基于证据的预防和促进健康干预措施:评估行动(DEVA)方法

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY Pratiques Psychologiques Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.prps.2021.06.001
B. Lamboy, A. Smeding
{"title":"制定基于证据的预防和促进健康干预措施:评估行动(DEVA)方法","authors":"B. Lamboy,&nbsp;A. Smeding","doi":"10.1016/j.prps.2021.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While scientific knowledge informing how to prevent main public health problems builds up since decades, the gap between professional practice and scientific evidence remains important. Regarding disease prevention and health promotion, professionals – including psychologists – aim at enriching their practice by relying on scientific knowledge. However, barriers to knowledge transfer remain. Here we present the Evaluation-Action Approach (DEVA), which has been created to overcome such barriers and provide an operational tool to practitioners willing to use the best available data. This article describes this new project methodology, which is anchored in the evidence-based paradigm, and has been developed based on methodological tools in French, along with assessment practices from different academic disciplines. It has been pre-tested and improved in an academic context and then tested with practitioners (locally and nationally). The DEVA comprises three stages and twelve steps, four of which are evaluations. These evaluative steps aim at checking whether, at each stage, the best available data are used and that the (working and health) objectives are reached. The DEVA can contribute to the need of methodological innovation and the development of professional and practical skills. This project methodology provides an operating procedure to facilitate knowledge transfer and the development of evidence-based prevention and health promotion interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54590,"journal":{"name":"Pratiques Psychologiques","volume":"28 4","pages":"Pages 209-223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.prps.2021.06.001","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Développer des interventions de prévention et de promotion de la santé fondées sur les données probantes : la Démarche EValuation Action (DEVA)\",\"authors\":\"B. Lamboy,&nbsp;A. Smeding\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prps.2021.06.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>While scientific knowledge informing how to prevent main public health problems builds up since decades, the gap between professional practice and scientific evidence remains important. Regarding disease prevention and health promotion, professionals – including psychologists – aim at enriching their practice by relying on scientific knowledge. However, barriers to knowledge transfer remain. Here we present the Evaluation-Action Approach (DEVA), which has been created to overcome such barriers and provide an operational tool to practitioners willing to use the best available data. This article describes this new project methodology, which is anchored in the evidence-based paradigm, and has been developed based on methodological tools in French, along with assessment practices from different academic disciplines. It has been pre-tested and improved in an academic context and then tested with practitioners (locally and nationally). The DEVA comprises three stages and twelve steps, four of which are evaluations. These evaluative steps aim at checking whether, at each stage, the best available data are used and that the (working and health) objectives are reached. The DEVA can contribute to the need of methodological innovation and the development of professional and practical skills. This project methodology provides an operating procedure to facilitate knowledge transfer and the development of evidence-based prevention and health promotion interventions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pratiques Psychologiques\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 209-223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.prps.2021.06.001\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pratiques Psychologiques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1269176321000419\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pratiques Psychologiques","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1269176321000419","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

几十年来,关于如何预防主要公共卫生问题的科学知识不断积累,但专业实践与科学证据之间的差距仍然很大。在预防疾病和促进健康方面,专业人员——包括心理学家——旨在依靠科学知识丰富他们的实践。然而,知识转移的障碍仍然存在。在这里,我们提出了评估-行动方法(DEVA),该方法旨在克服这些障碍,并为愿意使用最佳可用数据的从业者提供一种操作工具。本文描述了这种新的项目方法,该方法以基于证据的范式为基础,并基于法语的方法工具以及来自不同学科的评估实践而开发。它已经在学术背景下进行了预先测试和改进,然后在从业者中进行了测试(地方和国家)。DEVA包括三个阶段和十二个步骤,其中四个是评估。这些评价步骤的目的是检查在每个阶段是否使用了现有的最佳数据,以及是否达到了(工作和健康)目标。DEVA可以促进方法创新的需要以及专业和实践技能的发展。这一项目方法提供了一个操作程序,以促进知识转移和制定循证预防和促进健康干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Développer des interventions de prévention et de promotion de la santé fondées sur les données probantes : la Démarche EValuation Action (DEVA)

While scientific knowledge informing how to prevent main public health problems builds up since decades, the gap between professional practice and scientific evidence remains important. Regarding disease prevention and health promotion, professionals – including psychologists – aim at enriching their practice by relying on scientific knowledge. However, barriers to knowledge transfer remain. Here we present the Evaluation-Action Approach (DEVA), which has been created to overcome such barriers and provide an operational tool to practitioners willing to use the best available data. This article describes this new project methodology, which is anchored in the evidence-based paradigm, and has been developed based on methodological tools in French, along with assessment practices from different academic disciplines. It has been pre-tested and improved in an academic context and then tested with practitioners (locally and nationally). The DEVA comprises three stages and twelve steps, four of which are evaluations. These evaluative steps aim at checking whether, at each stage, the best available data are used and that the (working and health) objectives are reached. The DEVA can contribute to the need of methodological innovation and the development of professional and practical skills. This project methodology provides an operating procedure to facilitate knowledge transfer and the development of evidence-based prevention and health promotion interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: Pratiques psychologiques is an official publication of the ''Société française de psychologie''. It publishes thematic issues, and concentrates on the applications in the psychological practice. It covers all fields of psychology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board L’evidence-based practice en psychologie : une approche tripartite souvent mal comprise Difficultés et dispositifs d’aide en lecture à la fin du CP dans la cohorte ELFE. Quelques pistes de réflexion pour la pratique du psychologue de l’Éducation nationale Épidaure Market : développement d’un serious game sur l’alimentation durable, une intervention menée en milieu scolaire pour les collégiens Remerciements aux lecteurs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1