照我做的做,不要照我说的做:激励与认知能力和风险厌恶之间的关系

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Revista Brasileira de Economia Pub Date : 2019-12-19 DOI:10.5935/0034-7140.20190019
Sergio Almeida
{"title":"照我做的做,不要照我说的做:激励与认知能力和风险厌恶之间的关系","authors":"Sergio Almeida","doi":"10.5935/0034-7140.20190019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study how the use of real and hypothetical choices to elicit risk preferences affect the statistical relationship between cognitive ability and risk aversion. Our experimental results suggest that such association is sensitive to incentive conditions of the choice problems used to elicit risk preferences. Individuals in the upper tail of the cognitive ability distribution are willing to take more risks. But this holds only when choices involve hypothetical payoffs. When choices are real, this correlation is found insignificant. Results are robust to using alternative measures of cognitive ability.","PeriodicalId":52490,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Economia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do as I Do, Not as I Say: Incentivization and the Relationship Between Cognitive Ability and Risk Aversion\",\"authors\":\"Sergio Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/0034-7140.20190019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study how the use of real and hypothetical choices to elicit risk preferences affect the statistical relationship between cognitive ability and risk aversion. Our experimental results suggest that such association is sensitive to incentive conditions of the choice problems used to elicit risk preferences. Individuals in the upper tail of the cognitive ability distribution are willing to take more risks. But this holds only when choices involve hypothetical payoffs. When choices are real, this correlation is found insignificant. Results are robust to using alternative measures of cognitive ability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Economia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Economia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/0034-7140.20190019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Economia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/0034-7140.20190019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

我们研究如何使用真实和假设的选择来引出风险偏好影响认知能力和风险厌恶之间的统计关系。我们的实验结果表明,这种关联对用于引发风险偏好的选择问题的激励条件很敏感。处于认知能力分布上尾的个体愿意承担更多的风险。但这只在选择包含假设收益时成立。当选择是真实存在的时候,这种相关性就显得微不足道了。结果是稳健的使用替代措施的认知能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do as I Do, Not as I Say: Incentivization and the Relationship Between Cognitive Ability and Risk Aversion
We study how the use of real and hypothetical choices to elicit risk preferences affect the statistical relationship between cognitive ability and risk aversion. Our experimental results suggest that such association is sensitive to incentive conditions of the choice problems used to elicit risk preferences. Individuals in the upper tail of the cognitive ability distribution are willing to take more risks. But this holds only when choices involve hypothetical payoffs. When choices are real, this correlation is found insignificant. Results are robust to using alternative measures of cognitive ability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Economia
Revista Brasileira de Economia Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: A Revista Brasileira de Economia (RBE) é a mais antiga publicação de Economia do Brasil, e a segunda mais antiga da América Latina. Seus fundadores foram Arizio de Viana, o primeiro editor, e Eugênio Gudin, um dos mais influentes economistas da história brasileira. A RBE foi apresentada no seu primeiro número pelo professor Luiz Simões Lopes, em uma Introdução que poderia constar ainda hoje de qualquer número da revista.
期刊最新文献
Incentivos fiscais são efetivos na melhoria dos serviços educacionais? Cota-parte do ICMS no acesso à educação Uma nota sobre a avaliação do programa Agroamigo através de modelos Autoregressivos Vetoriais em Painel Modeling multivariate time series with copulas: Implications for pricing revenue insurance Descartando favorecimento político a beneficiários de programas habitacionais: Uma aplicação de Regressão em Descontinuidade O Impacto do comercio internacional sobre as condições de saúde: Uma abordagem estrutural
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1