电子健康平台作为用户数据交流:检查患者与数字健康数据的斗争

IF 2 Q2 COMMUNICATION Nordicom Review Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.2478/nor-2021-0040
M. Mahnke, Mikka Nielsen
{"title":"电子健康平台作为用户数据交流:检查患者与数字健康数据的斗争","authors":"M. Mahnke, Mikka Nielsen","doi":"10.2478/nor-2021-0040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Sundhed.dk is Denmark's national eHealth platform allowing citizens to access their personal health data. Based on 16 qualitative interviews with patients, our aim in this article is to examine how patients engage with their health data. First, we illustrate how patients struggle in different ways to make sense of numerical measurements and written notes. Second, we examine the platform as a communicative space and suggest that a new “medical-domestic” space arises in which medical data is interpreted and negotiated at home. Third, we investigate how health data affects patients’ experiences of being involved as equal partners and how access to data potentially enhances patient empowerment, but also how expectations are sometimes unfulfilled. In conclusion, we argue for a broader public dialogue in order to make sure that the data provided actually creates an optimal starting point and does not foster insecurity or self-doubt on the patient's side.","PeriodicalId":45517,"journal":{"name":"Nordicom Review","volume":"42 1","pages":"45 - 58"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"eHealth platforms as user–data communication: Examining patients’ struggles with digital health data\",\"authors\":\"M. Mahnke, Mikka Nielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/nor-2021-0040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Sundhed.dk is Denmark's national eHealth platform allowing citizens to access their personal health data. Based on 16 qualitative interviews with patients, our aim in this article is to examine how patients engage with their health data. First, we illustrate how patients struggle in different ways to make sense of numerical measurements and written notes. Second, we examine the platform as a communicative space and suggest that a new “medical-domestic” space arises in which medical data is interpreted and negotiated at home. Third, we investigate how health data affects patients’ experiences of being involved as equal partners and how access to data potentially enhances patient empowerment, but also how expectations are sometimes unfulfilled. In conclusion, we argue for a broader public dialogue in order to make sure that the data provided actually creates an optimal starting point and does not foster insecurity or self-doubt on the patient's side.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordicom Review\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"45 - 58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordicom Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordicom Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

抽象Sundhed。dk是丹麦的国家电子健康平台,允许公民访问他们的个人健康数据。基于对患者的16次定性访谈,我们在本文中的目的是研究患者如何参与他们的健康数据。首先,我们说明了患者如何以不同的方式努力理解数字测量和书面笔记。其次,我们将平台作为一个交流空间进行研究,并建议出现一个新的“医疗-家庭”空间,在这个空间中,医疗数据可以在家中进行解释和协商。第三,我们调查健康数据如何影响患者作为平等伙伴参与的体验,以及获取数据如何潜在地增强患者赋权,以及期望有时如何无法实现。总之,我们主张进行更广泛的公众对话,以确保所提供的数据实际上创造了一个最佳的起点,而不是在患者方面培养不安全感或自我怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
eHealth platforms as user–data communication: Examining patients’ struggles with digital health data
Abstract Sundhed.dk is Denmark's national eHealth platform allowing citizens to access their personal health data. Based on 16 qualitative interviews with patients, our aim in this article is to examine how patients engage with their health data. First, we illustrate how patients struggle in different ways to make sense of numerical measurements and written notes. Second, we examine the platform as a communicative space and suggest that a new “medical-domestic” space arises in which medical data is interpreted and negotiated at home. Third, we investigate how health data affects patients’ experiences of being involved as equal partners and how access to data potentially enhances patient empowerment, but also how expectations are sometimes unfulfilled. In conclusion, we argue for a broader public dialogue in order to make sure that the data provided actually creates an optimal starting point and does not foster insecurity or self-doubt on the patient's side.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nordicom Review
Nordicom Review COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
10
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
The changing role of a video-on-demand service in the strategies of public service media: A production study of Danish TV 2 Play and its impact on the production culture of the schedulers, 2016–2022 The reappropriation of time in television: How traditional qualities of broadcast media are being adopted by their video-on-demand services Politicians’ social media usage in a hybrid media environment: A scoping review of the literature between 2008–2022 Authoritarianism in the discourse of online forums: A study of its articulations in the Swedish context Post-publication gatekeeping practices: Exploring conversational and visual gatekeeping on Finnish newspapers’ Instagram accounts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1