{"title":"欧洲法院2017年1月19日对C-460/15 Schaefer Kalk GmbH&Co.KG诉Bundesrepublik Deutschland案的判决评论","authors":"Przemysław Siwior, Joanna Bukowska","doi":"10.2478/oszn-2018-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of this article is to discuss the following judgement of the European Court of Justice in case C-460/15 Schaefer Kalk GmbH & Co. KG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland concerning the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS): ‘The second sentence of Article 49(1) of Commission Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 of 21 June 2012 on the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and point 10(B) of Annex IV to that regulation are invalid in so far as they systematically include the carbon dioxide (CO2) transferred to another installation for the production of precipitated calcium carbonate in the emissions of the lime combustion installation, regardless of whether or not that CO2 is released into the atmosphere.’ [operative part of the judgment].","PeriodicalId":37767,"journal":{"name":"Ochrona Srodowiska i Zasobow Naturalnych","volume":"29 1","pages":"25 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commentary on European Court of Justice judgement of 19 January 2017 in case C-460/15 Schaefer Kalk GmbH & Co. KG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland\",\"authors\":\"Przemysław Siwior, Joanna Bukowska\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/oszn-2018-0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The aim of this article is to discuss the following judgement of the European Court of Justice in case C-460/15 Schaefer Kalk GmbH & Co. KG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland concerning the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS): ‘The second sentence of Article 49(1) of Commission Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 of 21 June 2012 on the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and point 10(B) of Annex IV to that regulation are invalid in so far as they systematically include the carbon dioxide (CO2) transferred to another installation for the production of precipitated calcium carbonate in the emissions of the lime combustion installation, regardless of whether or not that CO2 is released into the atmosphere.’ [operative part of the judgment].\",\"PeriodicalId\":37767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ochrona Srodowiska i Zasobow Naturalnych\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"25 - 30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ochrona Srodowiska i Zasobow Naturalnych\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/oszn-2018-0011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ochrona Srodowiska i Zasobow Naturalnych","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/oszn-2018-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
本文的目的是讨论欧洲法院在C-460/15 Schaefer Kalk GmbH & Co. KG诉德国联邦共和国一案中关于欧盟排放交易计划(EU ETS)的判决:“2012年6月21日关于根据欧洲议会和理事会指令2003/87/EC监测和报告温室气体排放的委员会法规(EU) No 601/2012第49(1)条第二句以及该法规附件IV第10(B)点无效，因为它们系统地将二氧化碳(CO2)转移到另一个装置中用于生产石灰燃烧排放的沉淀碳酸钙不管二氧化碳是否被释放到大气中。(判决书执行部分)。
Commentary on European Court of Justice judgement of 19 January 2017 in case C-460/15 Schaefer Kalk GmbH & Co. KG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
Abstract The aim of this article is to discuss the following judgement of the European Court of Justice in case C-460/15 Schaefer Kalk GmbH & Co. KG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland concerning the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS): ‘The second sentence of Article 49(1) of Commission Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 of 21 June 2012 on the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and point 10(B) of Annex IV to that regulation are invalid in so far as they systematically include the carbon dioxide (CO2) transferred to another installation for the production of precipitated calcium carbonate in the emissions of the lime combustion installation, regardless of whether or not that CO2 is released into the atmosphere.’ [operative part of the judgment].
期刊介绍：
The journal ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND NATURAL RESOURCES is a publication which addresses the issues of broadly understood environmental protection and publishes research and review papers. All these articles and papers are peer-reviewed. Interdisciplinary studies published by specialists in various fields present reciprocal relationships between the reactions taking place in the environment which are connected with natural element cycle and at the same time reflect both natural processes and human impacts. Themes of the works also concern socio-economic and technical issues at the UE, national, regional and local levels in the context of sustainable development. The main aim of the journal is to promote high level research in all aspects of environment and natural resources protection.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
