低品位硫化金矿生物氧化新工艺的比较研究

IF 1.5 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Geosystem Engineering Pub Date : 2022-07-04 DOI:10.1080/12269328.2022.2145376
Junmo Ahn, Jiajia Wu, Jaeheon Lee
{"title":"低品位硫化金矿生物氧化新工艺的比较研究","authors":"Junmo Ahn, Jiajia Wu, Jaeheon Lee","doi":"10.1080/12269328.2022.2145376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Sand Farming is one of novel biooxidation processes suitable for sulphide oxidation of low-grade refractory gold ores. It has been previously proven to be feasible and more efficient compared to other conventional sulphide oxidation processes. In this study, the Sand Farming was compared with conventional tank biooxidation to investigate biooxidation behaviors on ores with different mineralogy and compare the ultimate gold recovery. Ore samples were tested for Sand Farming biooxidation. Conventional tank biooxidation was also compared as the baseline. After each biooxidation was completed, cyanidation was conducted for gold extraction. The Sand Farming achieved the gold recovery of 75% from high grade with higher sulphur content sample (Sample A) and 68% from low grade with lower sulphur content sample (Sample B), slightly lower than tank biooxidation of 83% and 85%, respectively. Sand Farming can be an alternative to several sulphide oxidation processes with better overall economics.","PeriodicalId":12714,"journal":{"name":"Geosystem Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative studies of novel biooxidation process to low-grade sulphide gold ores\",\"authors\":\"Junmo Ahn, Jiajia Wu, Jaeheon Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/12269328.2022.2145376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The Sand Farming is one of novel biooxidation processes suitable for sulphide oxidation of low-grade refractory gold ores. It has been previously proven to be feasible and more efficient compared to other conventional sulphide oxidation processes. In this study, the Sand Farming was compared with conventional tank biooxidation to investigate biooxidation behaviors on ores with different mineralogy and compare the ultimate gold recovery. Ore samples were tested for Sand Farming biooxidation. Conventional tank biooxidation was also compared as the baseline. After each biooxidation was completed, cyanidation was conducted for gold extraction. The Sand Farming achieved the gold recovery of 75% from high grade with higher sulphur content sample (Sample A) and 68% from low grade with lower sulphur content sample (Sample B), slightly lower than tank biooxidation of 83% and 85%, respectively. Sand Farming can be an alternative to several sulphide oxidation processes with better overall economics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geosystem Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geosystem Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/12269328.2022.2145376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geosystem Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/12269328.2022.2145376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

砂场是一种适用于低品位难选金矿硫化物氧化的新型生物氧化工艺。以前已经证明,与其他传统的硫化物氧化工艺相比,它是可行的,更有效。在本研究中,将砂养殖与传统的槽式生物氧化进行了比较,以研究不同矿物学矿石的生物氧化行为,并比较最终的金回收率。对矿石样品进行了沙场生物氧化试验。还将传统的储罐生物氧化作为基线进行了比较。每次生物氧化完成后,进行氰化提金。砂场从含硫量较高的高品位样品(样品A)和含硫量较低的低品位样品(样本B)中分别获得75%和68%的黄金回收率,略低于83%和85%的槽式生物氧化法。砂养殖可以替代几种硫化物氧化工艺,具有更好的整体经济性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative studies of novel biooxidation process to low-grade sulphide gold ores
ABSTRACT The Sand Farming is one of novel biooxidation processes suitable for sulphide oxidation of low-grade refractory gold ores. It has been previously proven to be feasible and more efficient compared to other conventional sulphide oxidation processes. In this study, the Sand Farming was compared with conventional tank biooxidation to investigate biooxidation behaviors on ores with different mineralogy and compare the ultimate gold recovery. Ore samples were tested for Sand Farming biooxidation. Conventional tank biooxidation was also compared as the baseline. After each biooxidation was completed, cyanidation was conducted for gold extraction. The Sand Farming achieved the gold recovery of 75% from high grade with higher sulphur content sample (Sample A) and 68% from low grade with lower sulphur content sample (Sample B), slightly lower than tank biooxidation of 83% and 85%, respectively. Sand Farming can be an alternative to several sulphide oxidation processes with better overall economics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geosystem Engineering
Geosystem Engineering GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Novel approaches in geomechanical parameter estimation using machine learning methods and conventional well logs Correlating shale geochemistry with metal sorption: influence of kaolinite content Effect of activator type and Pozzocrete waste on the mechanical and microstructural properties of eco-friendly geopolymer incorporating electric arc furnace slag Study on tubing string safety during perforation detonation in ultra-deep wells The prediction of recovery percent of water-free stage and its application in the correction of theoretical water cut
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1