从技术接受度的角度看智慧城市技术

IF 2.1 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS IET Smart Cities Pub Date : 2022-08-25 DOI:10.1049/smc2.12040
Taşkın Dirsehan, Liesbet van Zoonen
{"title":"从技术接受度的角度看智慧城市技术","authors":"Taşkın Dirsehan,&nbsp;Liesbet van Zoonen","doi":"10.1049/smc2.12040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Most studies in the literature aim to discuss and examine the technologies in smart cities. Much less is known about the dynamics of their acceptance by citizens. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review of studies examining the acceptance of smart city technologies (SCTs), focussing particularly on Technology User Acceptance Models (TAM). Using a novel framework of SCTs based on the technology visibility and citizen interaction, we categorise them as individual-based explicit SCTs, collective-purpose explicit SCTs, digitising SCTs, and infrastructure SCTs. We assess that studies about citizen acceptation of SCTs have been mainly focussed on individual technologies. Also, the review shows that the field is nascent and fragmented, and that a wide variety of variables have been used to predict the adoption of individual-based explicit SCTs, with the classic ones of TAM (perceived use and perceived usefulness) unmistakably being relevant in the smart city context as well. As a result of the fragmentation of the field, our review was not yet able to identify generalisable knowledge about the acceptance of the smart city and its technologies by citizens. We end with some suggestions for future research approaches and designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":34740,"journal":{"name":"IET Smart Cities","volume":"4 3","pages":"197-210"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/smc2.12040","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smart city technologies from the perspective of technology acceptance\",\"authors\":\"Taşkın Dirsehan,&nbsp;Liesbet van Zoonen\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/smc2.12040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Most studies in the literature aim to discuss and examine the technologies in smart cities. Much less is known about the dynamics of their acceptance by citizens. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review of studies examining the acceptance of smart city technologies (SCTs), focussing particularly on Technology User Acceptance Models (TAM). Using a novel framework of SCTs based on the technology visibility and citizen interaction, we categorise them as individual-based explicit SCTs, collective-purpose explicit SCTs, digitising SCTs, and infrastructure SCTs. We assess that studies about citizen acceptation of SCTs have been mainly focussed on individual technologies. Also, the review shows that the field is nascent and fragmented, and that a wide variety of variables have been used to predict the adoption of individual-based explicit SCTs, with the classic ones of TAM (perceived use and perceived usefulness) unmistakably being relevant in the smart city context as well. As a result of the fragmentation of the field, our review was not yet able to identify generalisable knowledge about the acceptance of the smart city and its technologies by citizens. We end with some suggestions for future research approaches and designs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IET Smart Cities\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"197-210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/smc2.12040\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IET Smart Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/smc2.12040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Smart Cities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/smc2.12040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

文献中的大多数研究旨在讨论和检查智慧城市中的技术。人们对他们被公民接受的动力知之甚少。因此,我们对智能城市技术(sct)接受度的研究进行了系统的文献综述,特别关注技术用户接受模型(TAM)。我们使用基于技术可见性和公民互动的新sct框架,将其分类为基于个人的显式sct,集体目的的显式sct,数字化sct和基础设施sct。我们认为,关于公民接受sct的研究主要集中在个人技术上。此外,该综述还显示,该领域尚处于萌芽阶段,且支离破碎,并且已经使用了各种各样的变量来预测基于个人的明确sct的采用,而TAM(感知使用和感知有用性)的经典变量显然也与智慧城市背景相关。由于该领域的碎片化,我们的审查尚未能够确定有关市民对智慧城市及其技术的接受程度的一般知识。最后,对未来的研究方法和设计提出了一些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Smart city technologies from the perspective of technology acceptance

Most studies in the literature aim to discuss and examine the technologies in smart cities. Much less is known about the dynamics of their acceptance by citizens. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review of studies examining the acceptance of smart city technologies (SCTs), focussing particularly on Technology User Acceptance Models (TAM). Using a novel framework of SCTs based on the technology visibility and citizen interaction, we categorise them as individual-based explicit SCTs, collective-purpose explicit SCTs, digitising SCTs, and infrastructure SCTs. We assess that studies about citizen acceptation of SCTs have been mainly focussed on individual technologies. Also, the review shows that the field is nascent and fragmented, and that a wide variety of variables have been used to predict the adoption of individual-based explicit SCTs, with the classic ones of TAM (perceived use and perceived usefulness) unmistakably being relevant in the smart city context as well. As a result of the fragmentation of the field, our review was not yet able to identify generalisable knowledge about the acceptance of the smart city and its technologies by citizens. We end with some suggestions for future research approaches and designs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IET Smart Cities
IET Smart Cities Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
25
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
Guest Editorial: Smart cities 2.0: How Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things are transforming urban living Smart city fire surveillance: A deep state-space model with intelligent agents Securing smart cities through machine learning: A honeypot-driven approach to attack detection in Internet of Things ecosystems Smart resilience through IoT-enabled natural disaster management: A COVID-19 response in São Paulo state Optimising air quality prediction in smart cities with hybrid particle swarm optimization-long-short term memory-recurrent neural network model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1