足球中的三后卫与两后卫体系:进攻战术的比较

F. Otero-Saborido, Sergio Torreblanca-Martinez, Víctor Torreblanca-Martínez, F. Nevado-Garrosa, Manuel Nuñez-Campos, J. González-Jurado
{"title":"足球中的三后卫与两后卫体系:进攻战术的比较","authors":"F. Otero-Saborido, Sergio Torreblanca-Martinez, Víctor Torreblanca-Martínez, F. Nevado-Garrosa, Manuel Nuñez-Campos, J. González-Jurado","doi":"10.1177/17543371231178043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scientific research on tactical formations in football is scarce and the studies that do exist focus on aspects linked to physical conditioning. Therefore, the objective of this work was to analyse offensive play differences between three-centre-back (3CB) and two-centre-back (2CB) formations. A total of 72 matches played by eight LaLiga teams (Spain) during the 2018–19 season were analysed. Four teams used a 3CB system and four teams a 2CB system. Data were obtained from the Opta sports company, and the reports were generated using Mediacoach. Three groups of variables were analysed (passes, possession and finishing). The results showed that both the number of team passes (‘passes received’, ‘passes attempted’) and their effectiveness (‘number’ and % of ‘completed’ passes) were significantly greater ( p < 0.001) in 3CB systems. As far as possession was concerned, 3CB systems obtained a higher percentage ( p = 0.004, ES = 0.45), time average ( p = 0.001, ES = 0.57) and possessions with more than nine passes ( p = 0.000). Finally, regarding the variables relating to attack finishing, the values attained significantly higher levels in the 3CB teams in ‘expected goals’ ( p = 0.020), ‘goals scored’ ( p = 0.030) and ‘probability of a shot being a goal’ ( p = 0.046). It could be concluded that 3CB teams presented greater rates of ball possession and attack finishing.","PeriodicalId":20674,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three-defender versus two-defender systems in football: A comparison of offensive play\",\"authors\":\"F. Otero-Saborido, Sergio Torreblanca-Martinez, Víctor Torreblanca-Martínez, F. Nevado-Garrosa, Manuel Nuñez-Campos, J. González-Jurado\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17543371231178043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scientific research on tactical formations in football is scarce and the studies that do exist focus on aspects linked to physical conditioning. Therefore, the objective of this work was to analyse offensive play differences between three-centre-back (3CB) and two-centre-back (2CB) formations. A total of 72 matches played by eight LaLiga teams (Spain) during the 2018–19 season were analysed. Four teams used a 3CB system and four teams a 2CB system. Data were obtained from the Opta sports company, and the reports were generated using Mediacoach. Three groups of variables were analysed (passes, possession and finishing). The results showed that both the number of team passes (‘passes received’, ‘passes attempted’) and their effectiveness (‘number’ and % of ‘completed’ passes) were significantly greater ( p < 0.001) in 3CB systems. As far as possession was concerned, 3CB systems obtained a higher percentage ( p = 0.004, ES = 0.45), time average ( p = 0.001, ES = 0.57) and possessions with more than nine passes ( p = 0.000). Finally, regarding the variables relating to attack finishing, the values attained significantly higher levels in the 3CB teams in ‘expected goals’ ( p = 0.020), ‘goals scored’ ( p = 0.030) and ‘probability of a shot being a goal’ ( p = 0.046). It could be concluded that 3CB teams presented greater rates of ball possession and attack finishing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17543371231178043\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17543371231178043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于足球战术阵型的科学研究很少,现有的研究主要集中在与身体条件有关的方面。因此,本研究的目的是分析三中卫阵型(3CB)和双中卫阵型(2CB)在进攻打法上的差异。分析了2018-19赛季8支西甲球队(西班牙)的72场比赛。四支队伍使用3CB系统,四支队伍使用2CB系统。数据来自Opta体育公司,报告使用Mediacoach生成。分析了三组变量(传球、控球和射门)。结果表明,在3CB系统中,球队的传球次数(“收到的传球”、“尝试的传球”)和它们的效率(“完成的传球”的“次数”和百分比)都明显更大(p < 0.001)。就控球率而言,3CB系统获得了更高的百分比(p = 0.004, ES = 0.45),平均时间(p = 0.001, ES = 0.57)和超过9次传球的控球率(p = 0.000)。最后,关于与进攻射门有关的变量,在“预期进球”(p = 0.020)、“进球数”(p = 0.030)和“射门得分概率”(p = 0.046)方面,3CB球队的数值明显更高。可以得出结论,3CB球队的控球率和进攻完成率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Three-defender versus two-defender systems in football: A comparison of offensive play
Scientific research on tactical formations in football is scarce and the studies that do exist focus on aspects linked to physical conditioning. Therefore, the objective of this work was to analyse offensive play differences between three-centre-back (3CB) and two-centre-back (2CB) formations. A total of 72 matches played by eight LaLiga teams (Spain) during the 2018–19 season were analysed. Four teams used a 3CB system and four teams a 2CB system. Data were obtained from the Opta sports company, and the reports were generated using Mediacoach. Three groups of variables were analysed (passes, possession and finishing). The results showed that both the number of team passes (‘passes received’, ‘passes attempted’) and their effectiveness (‘number’ and % of ‘completed’ passes) were significantly greater ( p < 0.001) in 3CB systems. As far as possession was concerned, 3CB systems obtained a higher percentage ( p = 0.004, ES = 0.45), time average ( p = 0.001, ES = 0.57) and possessions with more than nine passes ( p = 0.000). Finally, regarding the variables relating to attack finishing, the values attained significantly higher levels in the 3CB teams in ‘expected goals’ ( p = 0.020), ‘goals scored’ ( p = 0.030) and ‘probability of a shot being a goal’ ( p = 0.046). It could be concluded that 3CB teams presented greater rates of ball possession and attack finishing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology covers the development of novel sports apparel, footwear, and equipment; and the materials, instrumentation, and processes that make advances in sports possible.
期刊最新文献
Effects of training repetition on young footballers’ tactical and physical performances: free and conditioned large-sided games A single trunk-mounted wearable sensor to measure motor performance in triathletes during competition The effectiveness of chalk as a friction modifier for finger pad contact with rocks of varying roughness In-plane density gradation of shoe midsoles for optimal energy absorption performance Development of a video-based test for assessing decision-making proficiency in football referees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1