同意“其他”?公众对新冠肺炎限制措施的态度以及警方在英格兰合规管理中的作用

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-05-10 DOI:10.1080/00380253.2022.2066030
R. Inkpen, Aram Ghaemmaghami, Geoff Newiss, Paul Smith, S. Charman, Stephanie Bennett, Camille Ilett
{"title":"同意“其他”?公众对新冠肺炎限制措施的态度以及警方在英格兰合规管理中的作用","authors":"R. Inkpen, Aram Ghaemmaghami, Geoff Newiss, Paul Smith, S. Charman, Stephanie Bennett, Camille Ilett","doi":"10.1080/00380253.2022.2066030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The aim of this paper is to consider the relationship between an emergent decay of social trust created by the Covid-19 pandemic and the formation of “in” and “out” groups. Data from 37 extensive semi-structured interviews with members of the public in England found that identifying the “other” through normative conceptions of “security and order” was used by participants to legitimize their own presence within the “in” group, while self-reported compliance with restrictions was used to construct identities to be in line with that of the “in” group. These findings have important implications both for social trust within and between communities and toward the police.","PeriodicalId":48007,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Quarterly","volume":"64 1","pages":"205 - 226"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Othering” by Consent? Public Attitudes to Covid-19 Restrictions and the Role of the Police in Managing Compliance in England\",\"authors\":\"R. Inkpen, Aram Ghaemmaghami, Geoff Newiss, Paul Smith, S. Charman, Stephanie Bennett, Camille Ilett\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00380253.2022.2066030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The aim of this paper is to consider the relationship between an emergent decay of social trust created by the Covid-19 pandemic and the formation of “in” and “out” groups. Data from 37 extensive semi-structured interviews with members of the public in England found that identifying the “other” through normative conceptions of “security and order” was used by participants to legitimize their own presence within the “in” group, while self-reported compliance with restrictions was used to construct identities to be in line with that of the “in” group. These findings have important implications both for social trust within and between communities and toward the police.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociological Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"205 - 226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociological Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2022.2066030\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2022.2066030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文的目的是考虑新冠肺炎大流行造成的社会信任的突然衰退与“入”和“出”群体的形成之间的关系。对英国公众进行的37次广泛的半结构化访谈的数据发现,参与者通过“安全和秩序”的规范概念来识别“另一个人”,以使自己在“in”群体中的存在合法化,而自我报告的遵守限制的情况则被用来构建与“in”人群一致的身份。这些发现对社区内部和社区之间的社会信任以及对警察的信任都有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Othering” by Consent? Public Attitudes to Covid-19 Restrictions and the Role of the Police in Managing Compliance in England
ABSTRACT The aim of this paper is to consider the relationship between an emergent decay of social trust created by the Covid-19 pandemic and the formation of “in” and “out” groups. Data from 37 extensive semi-structured interviews with members of the public in England found that identifying the “other” through normative conceptions of “security and order” was used by participants to legitimize their own presence within the “in” group, while self-reported compliance with restrictions was used to construct identities to be in line with that of the “in” group. These findings have important implications both for social trust within and between communities and toward the police.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The Sociological Quarterly is devoted to publishing cutting-edge research and theory in all areas of sociological inquiry. Our focus is on publishing the best in empirical research and sociological theory. We look for articles that advance the discipline and reach the widest possible audience. Since 1960, the contributors and readers of The Sociological Quarterly have made it one of the leading generalist journals in the field. Each issue is designed for efficient browsing and reading and the articles are helpful for teaching and classroom use.
期刊最新文献
Unconventional Work, Conventional Problems: Gig Microtask Work, Inequality, and the Flexibility Mystique Mooring Christian Nationalism: How Religious Institutions, Participation, and Beliefs Inform Christian Nationalism Labor Market Inequality, Debt, and the Consequences of Sub-Baccalaureate Higher Education How Local Perceptions Contribute to Urban Environmental Activism: Evidence from the Chicago Metropolitan Area Sad Puppies and SJWs: Symbolic Revolution and Challenges to Field Orthodoxy in the Struggle for Control of Science Fiction’s Hugo Awards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1