沙滩排球运动中冲力效应的探讨

IF 0.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Zeitschrift Fur Sportpsychologie Pub Date : 2023-05-05 DOI:10.1026/1612-5010/a000393
Liane Lillich, Geoffrey Schweizer, Marcel Nießner
{"title":"沙滩排球运动中冲力效应的探讨","authors":"Liane Lillich, Geoffrey Schweizer, Marcel Nießner","doi":"10.1026/1612-5010/a000393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The goal of the present study was to investigate whether in a beach volleyball game between teams of equally skilled players, a team is more likely to win a three-set match if it has won the second set than if it has won the first one. Furthermore, we analyzed how many games end after two or after three sets. We compared three models making different predictions: the psychological momentum model (PMM), the strategic effects model (SEM), and the independent probability model (IPM). In line with the PMM and the SEM, the results showed that regardless of how strictly we controlled for ability, there were always significantly more two-set than three-set matches (33 – 44 % three-set matches). In line with the SEM, but not the PMM, the analysis of almost 1,000 three-set matches between equally skilled players suggested that in a third set neither the winner of the first nor the winner of the second set has an advantage in the third set.","PeriodicalId":43878,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Sportpsychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Searching for the Effects of Momentum in Beach Volleyball\",\"authors\":\"Liane Lillich, Geoffrey Schweizer, Marcel Nießner\",\"doi\":\"10.1026/1612-5010/a000393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: The goal of the present study was to investigate whether in a beach volleyball game between teams of equally skilled players, a team is more likely to win a three-set match if it has won the second set than if it has won the first one. Furthermore, we analyzed how many games end after two or after three sets. We compared three models making different predictions: the psychological momentum model (PMM), the strategic effects model (SEM), and the independent probability model (IPM). In line with the PMM and the SEM, the results showed that regardless of how strictly we controlled for ability, there were always significantly more two-set than three-set matches (33 – 44 % three-set matches). In line with the SEM, but not the PMM, the analysis of almost 1,000 three-set matches between equally skilled players suggested that in a third set neither the winner of the first nor the winner of the second set has an advantage in the third set.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Sportpsychologie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Sportpsychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1026/1612-5010/a000393\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Sportpsychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1026/1612-5010/a000393","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本研究旨在探讨在一场技术水平相当的沙滩排球比赛中,赢得第二局的球队是否比赢得第一局的球队更有可能赢得三局比赛。此外,我们还分析了有多少游戏在两局或三局之后结束。我们比较了心理动量模型(PMM)、战略效应模型(SEM)和独立概率模型(IPM)三种不同预测的模型。与PMM和SEM一致,结果表明,无论我们如何严格控制能力,两盘匹配总是明显多于三盘匹配(33% - 44%三盘匹配)。与SEM(而非PMM)一致的是,对技术水平相当的棋手之间近1000场三局比赛的分析表明,在第三局中,第一局和第二局的赢家都不会在第三局中占据优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Searching for the Effects of Momentum in Beach Volleyball
Abstract: The goal of the present study was to investigate whether in a beach volleyball game between teams of equally skilled players, a team is more likely to win a three-set match if it has won the second set than if it has won the first one. Furthermore, we analyzed how many games end after two or after three sets. We compared three models making different predictions: the psychological momentum model (PMM), the strategic effects model (SEM), and the independent probability model (IPM). In line with the PMM and the SEM, the results showed that regardless of how strictly we controlled for ability, there were always significantly more two-set than three-set matches (33 – 44 % three-set matches). In line with the SEM, but not the PMM, the analysis of almost 1,000 three-set matches between equally skilled players suggested that in a third set neither the winner of the first nor the winner of the second set has an advantage in the third set.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zeitschrift Fur Sportpsychologie
Zeitschrift Fur Sportpsychologie PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
28.60%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Gender Data Gap im Sport – Geschlechtsspezifische und individualisierte Ansätze in Training und Wettkampf Are International PhD Courses an Important Part of PhD Education in Sport and Exercise Psychology? Nachrichten aus der asp Heimvorteil erklärt: Das Home Advantage Mediated (HAM) Modell Wenn Missbrauchsfälle auch mit Strukturanalyse zu tun haben
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1