Fredy Vargas-Cárdenas , Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez , Jose Carlos Morante-Filho , Jorge E. Schondube , Daniel M. Auliz-Ortiz , Eliane Ceccon
{"title":"景观森林的消失减少了山区鸟类多样性,对森林物种产生了强烈的负面影响","authors":"Fredy Vargas-Cárdenas , Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez , Jose Carlos Morante-Filho , Jorge E. Schondube , Daniel M. Auliz-Ortiz , Eliane Ceccon","doi":"10.1016/j.pecon.2022.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding how biological communities respond to human-caused landscape disturbances is urgently needed to identify optimal spatial scenarios for preserving biodiversity in anthropogenic landscapes. Forest loss is increasingly cited as a major disturbance in these landscapes, but its impact on biodiversity in mountain regions with high endemism is not well understood. Here we evaluated how bird species diversity responds to forest loss in ‘La Montaña’ mountain region of Guerrero State, Mexico. We separately assessed the complete bird assemblage, and the diversity and spatial distribution of three different ecological groups (forest-specialists, habitat-generalists, and disturbance-adapted species) in the whole landscape mosaic. We found that the diversity of the complete assemblage decreased linearly with forest loss. However, species responses to forest loss differed among ecological groups, with the diversity of forest-specialist and habitat-generalist species increasing in more forested landscapes, and the diversity of disturbance-adapted species following the opposite pattern. Similarly, the proportion of sites occupied by forest-specialist birds decreased with forest loss, but site occupancy by habitat-generalist and disturbance-adapted birds was independent from forest cover. Our findings highlight that the optimal landscape scenarios for preserving bird biodiversity in general and forest species in particular, are those that maintain as much forest cover as possible.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56034,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation","volume":"20 4","pages":"Pages 386-393"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064422000608/pdfft?md5=669c1d9f8cfc489b83fd989c1e7a0f8f&pid=1-s2.0-S2530064422000608-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Landscape forest loss decreases bird diversity with strong negative impacts on forest species in a mountain region\",\"authors\":\"Fredy Vargas-Cárdenas , Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez , Jose Carlos Morante-Filho , Jorge E. Schondube , Daniel M. Auliz-Ortiz , Eliane Ceccon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pecon.2022.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Understanding how biological communities respond to human-caused landscape disturbances is urgently needed to identify optimal spatial scenarios for preserving biodiversity in anthropogenic landscapes. Forest loss is increasingly cited as a major disturbance in these landscapes, but its impact on biodiversity in mountain regions with high endemism is not well understood. Here we evaluated how bird species diversity responds to forest loss in ‘La Montaña’ mountain region of Guerrero State, Mexico. We separately assessed the complete bird assemblage, and the diversity and spatial distribution of three different ecological groups (forest-specialists, habitat-generalists, and disturbance-adapted species) in the whole landscape mosaic. We found that the diversity of the complete assemblage decreased linearly with forest loss. However, species responses to forest loss differed among ecological groups, with the diversity of forest-specialist and habitat-generalist species increasing in more forested landscapes, and the diversity of disturbance-adapted species following the opposite pattern. Similarly, the proportion of sites occupied by forest-specialist birds decreased with forest loss, but site occupancy by habitat-generalist and disturbance-adapted birds was independent from forest cover. Our findings highlight that the optimal landscape scenarios for preserving bird biodiversity in general and forest species in particular, are those that maintain as much forest cover as possible.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation\",\"volume\":\"20 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 386-393\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064422000608/pdfft?md5=669c1d9f8cfc489b83fd989c1e7a0f8f&pid=1-s2.0-S2530064422000608-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064422000608\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064422000608","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
迫切需要了解生物群落如何应对人为景观干扰,以确定在人为景观中保护生物多样性的最佳空间方案。森林损失越来越多地被认为是这些景观的主要干扰因素,但其对高地方性山区生物多样性的影响尚不清楚。在这里,我们评估了鸟类物种多样性对墨西哥格雷罗州' La Montaña '山区森林损失的响应。我们分别评估了整个景观马赛克中三个不同的生态类群(森林专种鸟、生境通种鸟和干扰适应鸟)的完整鸟类组合和多样性和空间分布。我们发现,随着森林的减少,完整组合的多样性呈线性下降。然而,物种对森林损失的反应在不同的生态组之间存在差异,在森林覆盖率更高的景观中,森林专门性物种和生境通用性物种的多样性增加,而适应干扰的物种的多样性则相反。同样,森林专门性鸟类占据的地点比例随着森林的减少而减少,但栖息地通用型和干扰适应型鸟类占据的地点与森林覆盖无关。我们的研究结果强调,保护鸟类生物多样性,特别是森林物种的最佳景观方案是保持尽可能多的森林覆盖。
Landscape forest loss decreases bird diversity with strong negative impacts on forest species in a mountain region
Understanding how biological communities respond to human-caused landscape disturbances is urgently needed to identify optimal spatial scenarios for preserving biodiversity in anthropogenic landscapes. Forest loss is increasingly cited as a major disturbance in these landscapes, but its impact on biodiversity in mountain regions with high endemism is not well understood. Here we evaluated how bird species diversity responds to forest loss in ‘La Montaña’ mountain region of Guerrero State, Mexico. We separately assessed the complete bird assemblage, and the diversity and spatial distribution of three different ecological groups (forest-specialists, habitat-generalists, and disturbance-adapted species) in the whole landscape mosaic. We found that the diversity of the complete assemblage decreased linearly with forest loss. However, species responses to forest loss differed among ecological groups, with the diversity of forest-specialist and habitat-generalist species increasing in more forested landscapes, and the diversity of disturbance-adapted species following the opposite pattern. Similarly, the proportion of sites occupied by forest-specialist birds decreased with forest loss, but site occupancy by habitat-generalist and disturbance-adapted birds was independent from forest cover. Our findings highlight that the optimal landscape scenarios for preserving bird biodiversity in general and forest species in particular, are those that maintain as much forest cover as possible.
期刊介绍:
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation (PECON) is a scientific journal devoted to improving theoretical and conceptual aspects of conservation science. It has the main purpose of communicating new research and advances to different actors of society, including researchers, conservationists, practitioners, and policymakers. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation publishes original papers on biodiversity conservation and restoration, on the main drivers affecting native ecosystems, and on nature’s benefits to people and human wellbeing. This scope includes studies on biodiversity patterns, the effects of habitat loss, fragmentation, biological invasion and climate change on biodiversity, conservation genetics, spatial conservation planning, ecosystem management, ecosystem services, sustainability and resilience of socio-ecological systems, conservation policy, among others.