{"title":"佛罗里达家庭法倡导的界限:合作实践的授权","authors":"J. Esq., A. Joshua","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3235076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I argue that the Florida Family Law Bounds of Advocacy is mandatory as to family attorneys, not merely aspirational and that given the parallel philosophies between the BoA and collaborative practice, all family attorneys should become trained in collaborative practice and offer it is as the first solution for family law dispute resolution. The paper offers public policy suggestions to help shift legal practice from litigation to collaboration.","PeriodicalId":82201,"journal":{"name":"Nova law review","volume":"43 1","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Florida Family Law Bounds of Advocacy: A Mandate for Collaborative Practice\",\"authors\":\"J. Esq., A. Joshua\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3235076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I argue that the Florida Family Law Bounds of Advocacy is mandatory as to family attorneys, not merely aspirational and that given the parallel philosophies between the BoA and collaborative practice, all family attorneys should become trained in collaborative practice and offer it is as the first solution for family law dispute resolution. The paper offers public policy suggestions to help shift legal practice from litigation to collaboration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nova law review\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nova law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3235076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nova law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3235076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Florida Family Law Bounds of Advocacy: A Mandate for Collaborative Practice
I argue that the Florida Family Law Bounds of Advocacy is mandatory as to family attorneys, not merely aspirational and that given the parallel philosophies between the BoA and collaborative practice, all family attorneys should become trained in collaborative practice and offer it is as the first solution for family law dispute resolution. The paper offers public policy suggestions to help shift legal practice from litigation to collaboration.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
