评论:Colin Corpus、Mark Roberts、Rachel Wall的《英格兰地方政府:中央集权、自治和控制》

IF 0.5 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance Pub Date : 2018-04-13 DOI:10.5130/cjlg.v0i20.6021
Jonathan Carr-West
{"title":"评论:Colin Corpus、Mark Roberts、Rachel Wall的《英格兰地方政府:中央集权、自治和控制》","authors":"Jonathan Carr-West","doi":"10.5130/cjlg.v0i20.6021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Local Government in England: Centralisation, Autonomy and Control is a serious book and an important contribution to the scholarship around local government. It opens however, with a pleasingly comic tableau as academics from England, Portugal and Poland bicker amiably at a conference and on Twitter about whose country is really the most centralised. The rest of the book is devoted to showing why the English academics were right, why it matters and what should be done about it. \n \nThe main thrust of the text is an analysis of the impact of the dominant policy narratives around centralism and localism. The argument that Copus, Wall and Roberts put forward could be boiled down to the assertion that the problem with local government in England is that it is neither local nor government. But to make this case they first helpfully unpack several sets of concepts that are all too often elided together.","PeriodicalId":43511,"journal":{"name":"Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5130/cjlg.v0i20.6021","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review: Local Government in England: Centralisation, Autonomy and Control by Colin Corpus, Mark Roberts, Rachel Wall\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Carr-West\",\"doi\":\"10.5130/cjlg.v0i20.6021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Local Government in England: Centralisation, Autonomy and Control is a serious book and an important contribution to the scholarship around local government. It opens however, with a pleasingly comic tableau as academics from England, Portugal and Poland bicker amiably at a conference and on Twitter about whose country is really the most centralised. The rest of the book is devoted to showing why the English academics were right, why it matters and what should be done about it. \\n \\nThe main thrust of the text is an analysis of the impact of the dominant policy narratives around centralism and localism. The argument that Copus, Wall and Roberts put forward could be boiled down to the assertion that the problem with local government in England is that it is neither local nor government. But to make this case they first helpfully unpack several sets of concepts that are all too often elided together.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5130/cjlg.v0i20.6021\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5130/cjlg.v0i20.6021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5130/cjlg.v0i20.6021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《英格兰地方政府:中央集权、自治和控制》是一本严肃的书,也是对地方政府学术的重要贡献。然而,它以一个令人愉快的喜剧场景开场,来自英格兰、葡萄牙和波兰的学者在一次会议上和推特上友好地争论着谁的国家真正是最集中的。本书的其余部分致力于展示为什么英国学者是对的,为什么这很重要,以及应该对此做些什么。正文的主旨是分析围绕中心主义和地方主义的主流政策叙事的影响。Copus、Wall和Roberts提出的论点可以归结为英格兰地方政府的问题在于它既不是地方政府,也不是政府。但为了证明这一点,他们首先有益地解开了几组经常被忽略在一起的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Review: Local Government in England: Centralisation, Autonomy and Control by Colin Corpus, Mark Roberts, Rachel Wall
Local Government in England: Centralisation, Autonomy and Control is a serious book and an important contribution to the scholarship around local government. It opens however, with a pleasingly comic tableau as academics from England, Portugal and Poland bicker amiably at a conference and on Twitter about whose country is really the most centralised. The rest of the book is devoted to showing why the English academics were right, why it matters and what should be done about it. The main thrust of the text is an analysis of the impact of the dominant policy narratives around centralism and localism. The argument that Copus, Wall and Roberts put forward could be boiled down to the assertion that the problem with local government in England is that it is neither local nor government. But to make this case they first helpfully unpack several sets of concepts that are all too often elided together.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Funding primary health care service delivery in the West Nile sub-region, Uganda The impact of New Public Management reforms on the delivery of secondary education in Tanzania An Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice to Parliament: what can Australia learn from other countries? Review: The Winding Stair by Sir Rodney Brooke How informal ties matter: encroachment on road reservations along the Kumasi–Accra highway in Ghana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1