废除奴隶制的革命政治

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Polity Pub Date : 2023-08-21 DOI:10.1086/726388
Anna Terwiel
{"title":"废除奴隶制的革命政治","authors":"Anna Terwiel","doi":"10.1086/726388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What does it mean to abolish the police? 1 Narrowly defined, the police are the state institution authorized to use violence against citizens, residents, and anyone else present in a given territory, to maintain public order and enforce the law. But by and large, contemporary abolitionists in the United States resist defining police in this narrow sense. Instead, they define the police expansively, to include not only private security forces and citizens who act as informal police deputies but also broader practices and institutions that surveil and control Black people and other marginalized groups. This expansive definition locates the police on a continuum with prisons and the carceral, and abolitionist scholars and activists have called for the abolition of the child welfare system, social work, and residential institutions for people with disabilities, among other demands. In part, this expansive definition of policing reflects the punitive nature of the contemporary U.S. state, in which racialized policing and punishment have either become entangled with or overtaken other state functions, such as the provision of basic","PeriodicalId":46912,"journal":{"name":"Polity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Revolutionary Politics of Abolition\",\"authors\":\"Anna Terwiel\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/726388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What does it mean to abolish the police? 1 Narrowly defined, the police are the state institution authorized to use violence against citizens, residents, and anyone else present in a given territory, to maintain public order and enforce the law. But by and large, contemporary abolitionists in the United States resist defining police in this narrow sense. Instead, they define the police expansively, to include not only private security forces and citizens who act as informal police deputies but also broader practices and institutions that surveil and control Black people and other marginalized groups. This expansive definition locates the police on a continuum with prisons and the carceral, and abolitionist scholars and activists have called for the abolition of the child welfare system, social work, and residential institutions for people with disabilities, among other demands. In part, this expansive definition of policing reflects the punitive nature of the contemporary U.S. state, in which racialized policing and punishment have either become entangled with or overtaken other state functions, such as the provision of basic\",\"PeriodicalId\":46912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/726388\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polity","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726388","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

废除警察意味着什么?1狭义地说,警察是国家机构,有权对公民、居民和特定地区的任何其他人使用暴力,以维持公共秩序和执法。但总的来说,美国当代废奴主义者拒绝用这种狭义的定义来定义警察。相反,他们对警察的定义更为宽泛,不仅包括私人安全部队和作为非正式警察代表的公民,还包括监视和控制黑人和其他边缘化群体的更广泛的做法和机构。这一宽泛的定义将警察与监狱和尸体放在一个连续体上,废奴主义学者和活动家呼吁废除儿童福利制度、社会工作和残疾人寄宿机构等要求。在某种程度上,这种对警务的广泛定义反映了当代美国国家的惩罚性,在这种情况下,种族化的警务和惩罚要么与其他国家职能纠缠在一起,要么超越了其他国家职能,例如提供
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Revolutionary Politics of Abolition
What does it mean to abolish the police? 1 Narrowly defined, the police are the state institution authorized to use violence against citizens, residents, and anyone else present in a given territory, to maintain public order and enforce the law. But by and large, contemporary abolitionists in the United States resist defining police in this narrow sense. Instead, they define the police expansively, to include not only private security forces and citizens who act as informal police deputies but also broader practices and institutions that surveil and control Black people and other marginalized groups. This expansive definition locates the police on a continuum with prisons and the carceral, and abolitionist scholars and activists have called for the abolition of the child welfare system, social work, and residential institutions for people with disabilities, among other demands. In part, this expansive definition of policing reflects the punitive nature of the contemporary U.S. state, in which racialized policing and punishment have either become entangled with or overtaken other state functions, such as the provision of basic
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polity
Polity POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1968, Polity has been committed to the publication of scholarship reflecting the full variety of approaches to the study of politics. As journals have become more specialized and less accessible to many within the discipline of political science, Polity has remained ecumenical. The editor and editorial board welcome articles intended to be of interest to an entire field (e.g., political theory or international politics) within political science, to the discipline as a whole, and to scholars in related disciplines in the social sciences and the humanities. Scholarship of this type promises to be highly "productive" - that is, to stimulate other scholars to ask fresh questions and reconsider conventional assumptions.
期刊最新文献
Does Size Matter in the Context of the Global South? Theorizing the Smallest States The Unique and the Universal in International Studies Theories from the Global South Ideas from the Global South: Dependency and Decoloniality Incorporating Global South Perspectives in the Study of International Relations: Reflections on the Field Long Day’s Journey Into Night
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1