COVID-19时期美国人对科学和机构的信任

IF 2.1 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Daedalus Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1162/daed_a_01945
Ross Hatton, Colleen L. Barry, A. Levine, E. Mcginty, Hahrie Han
{"title":"COVID-19时期美国人对科学和机构的信任","authors":"Ross Hatton, Colleen L. Barry, A. Levine, E. Mcginty, Hahrie Han","doi":"10.1162/daed_a_01945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic prompted many discussions about how people's trust in science shaped our ability to address the crisis. Early in the pandemic, our research team set out to understand how trust in science relates to support for public health guidelines, and to identify some trusted sources of science. In this essay, we share our findings and offer ideas about what might be done to strengthen the public's trust in science. Notably, our research shows a stark partisan divide: Republicans had lower support for public health guidelines, and their trust in science and institutions such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health eroded over time. Meanwhile, Democrats’ trust in science has remained high throughout the pandemic. In the context of this divide, we explore how trust in various information sources, from governmental institutions to the media, relates to trust in science, and suggest that the best avenue for rebuilding trust might be through empowering local institutions and leaders to help manage future crises.","PeriodicalId":47980,"journal":{"name":"Daedalus","volume":"151 1","pages":"83-97"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"American Trust in Science & Institutions in the Time of COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Ross Hatton, Colleen L. Barry, A. Levine, E. Mcginty, Hahrie Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/daed_a_01945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic prompted many discussions about how people's trust in science shaped our ability to address the crisis. Early in the pandemic, our research team set out to understand how trust in science relates to support for public health guidelines, and to identify some trusted sources of science. In this essay, we share our findings and offer ideas about what might be done to strengthen the public's trust in science. Notably, our research shows a stark partisan divide: Republicans had lower support for public health guidelines, and their trust in science and institutions such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health eroded over time. Meanwhile, Democrats’ trust in science has remained high throughout the pandemic. In the context of this divide, we explore how trust in various information sources, from governmental institutions to the media, relates to trust in science, and suggest that the best avenue for rebuilding trust might be through empowering local institutions and leaders to help manage future crises.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Daedalus\",\"volume\":\"151 1\",\"pages\":\"83-97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Daedalus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01945\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Daedalus","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01945","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要新冠肺炎大流行引发了许多关于人们对科学的信任如何塑造我们应对危机的能力的讨论。在疫情早期,我们的研究团队开始了解对科学的信任与对公共卫生指南的支持之间的关系,并确定一些值得信赖的科学来源。在这篇文章中,我们分享了我们的发现,并就如何加强公众对科学的信任提出了一些想法。值得注意的是,我们的研究显示出明显的党派分歧:共和党人对公共卫生指导方针的支持率较低,他们对科学和机构的信任随着时间的推移而减弱,如疾病控制与预防中心和美国国立卫生研究院。与此同时,在整个疫情期间,民主党人对科学的信任度一直很高。在这种分歧的背景下,我们探讨了从政府机构到媒体对各种信息来源的信任与对科学的信任之间的关系,并建议重建信任的最佳途径可能是授权地方机构和领导人帮助管理未来的危机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
American Trust in Science & Institutions in the Time of COVID-19
Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic prompted many discussions about how people's trust in science shaped our ability to address the crisis. Early in the pandemic, our research team set out to understand how trust in science relates to support for public health guidelines, and to identify some trusted sources of science. In this essay, we share our findings and offer ideas about what might be done to strengthen the public's trust in science. Notably, our research shows a stark partisan divide: Republicans had lower support for public health guidelines, and their trust in science and institutions such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health eroded over time. Meanwhile, Democrats’ trust in science has remained high throughout the pandemic. In the context of this divide, we explore how trust in various information sources, from governmental institutions to the media, relates to trust in science, and suggest that the best avenue for rebuilding trust might be through empowering local institutions and leaders to help manage future crises.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Daedalus
Daedalus Multiple-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Daedalus was founded in 1955 as the Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. It draws on the enormous intellectual capacity of the American Academy, whose members are among the nation"s most prominent thinkers in the arts, sciences, and humanities. Each issue addresses a theme with authoritative essays on topics such as judicial independence, reflecting on the humanities, the global nuclear future, the challenge of mass incarceration, the future of news, the economy, the military, and race.
期刊最新文献
Disorders of Mood: The Experience of Those Who Have Them Rethinking Psychiatry: Solutions for a Sociogenic Crisis Two Sides of Depression: Medical & Social Indigenous Historical Trauma: Alter-Native Explanations for Mental Health Inequities The Biology of Mental Disorders: Progress at Last
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1