互联网的变革:b谷歌和Facebook案例研讨会前言

Q2 Social Sciences Antitrust Bulletin Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.1177/0003603X211070122
H. First
{"title":"互联网的变革:b谷歌和Facebook案例研讨会前言","authors":"H. First","doi":"10.1177/0003603X211070122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this Essay, which serves as a Foreword to the Antitrust Bulletin Symposium issue on the Google and Facebook cases, I argue that the Internet is now in the process of disrupting antitrust, as it has disrupted so many other areas of business and political life. This should not be surprising. The basic architecture of the Internet—decentralization and content agnosticism—enabled disruption; disruption is a “feature not a bug.” There is no reason to think that this disruption is now over and good reason to recognize its effect on antitrust. The Essay thus sketches out some of the ways in which the “Internet of Change” is now disrupting antitrust, including basic legal concepts (“markets” “monopoly”), economic models (reduced output is not the problem), and theories of harm. The Essay then provides short descriptions of the articles in the Symposium and concludes that although the Internet of Change has increased our impatience, we may have no choice but to await the slow and uncertain progress of the current litigation.","PeriodicalId":36832,"journal":{"name":"Antitrust Bulletin","volume":"67 1","pages":"3 - 11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Internet of Change: Foreword to the Symposium on the Google and Facebook Cases\",\"authors\":\"H. First\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0003603X211070122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this Essay, which serves as a Foreword to the Antitrust Bulletin Symposium issue on the Google and Facebook cases, I argue that the Internet is now in the process of disrupting antitrust, as it has disrupted so many other areas of business and political life. This should not be surprising. The basic architecture of the Internet—decentralization and content agnosticism—enabled disruption; disruption is a “feature not a bug.” There is no reason to think that this disruption is now over and good reason to recognize its effect on antitrust. The Essay thus sketches out some of the ways in which the “Internet of Change” is now disrupting antitrust, including basic legal concepts (“markets” “monopoly”), economic models (reduced output is not the problem), and theories of harm. The Essay then provides short descriptions of the articles in the Symposium and concludes that although the Internet of Change has increased our impatience, we may have no choice but to await the slow and uncertain progress of the current litigation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antitrust Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"3 - 11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antitrust Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X211070122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antitrust Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X211070122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,作为b谷歌和Facebook案例的反垄断公报专题讨论会的前言,我认为互联网现在正处于破坏反垄断的过程中,因为它已经破坏了商业和政治生活的许多其他领域。这不足为奇。互联网的基本架构——去中心化和内容不可知论——使破坏成为可能;颠覆是一种“特性,而不是缺陷”。没有理由认为这种颠覆已经结束,也没有理由承认它对反垄断的影响。因此,这篇文章概述了“互联网变革”正在颠覆反垄断的一些方式,包括基本的法律概念(“市场”、“垄断”)、经济模型(减少产出不是问题)和危害理论。论文随后对研讨会上的文章进行了简短的描述,并得出结论,尽管互联网的变化增加了我们的不耐烦,但我们可能别无选择,只能等待当前诉讼的缓慢而不确定的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Internet of Change: Foreword to the Symposium on the Google and Facebook Cases
In this Essay, which serves as a Foreword to the Antitrust Bulletin Symposium issue on the Google and Facebook cases, I argue that the Internet is now in the process of disrupting antitrust, as it has disrupted so many other areas of business and political life. This should not be surprising. The basic architecture of the Internet—decentralization and content agnosticism—enabled disruption; disruption is a “feature not a bug.” There is no reason to think that this disruption is now over and good reason to recognize its effect on antitrust. The Essay thus sketches out some of the ways in which the “Internet of Change” is now disrupting antitrust, including basic legal concepts (“markets” “monopoly”), economic models (reduced output is not the problem), and theories of harm. The Essay then provides short descriptions of the articles in the Symposium and concludes that although the Internet of Change has increased our impatience, we may have no choice but to await the slow and uncertain progress of the current litigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antitrust Bulletin
Antitrust Bulletin Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Geographic Market Definition in Commercial Health Insurer Matters: A Unified Approach for Merger Review, Monopolization Claims, and Monopsonization Claims Do EU and U.K. Antitrust “Bite”?: A Hard Look at “Soft” Enforcement and Negotiated Penalty Settlements Wall Street’s Practice of Compelling Confidentiality of Private Underwriting Fees: An Antitrust Violation? Two Challenges for Neo-Brandeisian Antitrust Epic Battles in Two-Sided Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1