情境的困难:商业模拟游戏学习迁移的探索性研究

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Decision Sciences-Journal of Innovative Education Pub Date : 2022-02-03 DOI:10.1111/dsji.12259
Christopher M. Scherpereel, Susan K. Williams, Scott Hoefle
{"title":"情境的困难:商业模拟游戏学习迁移的探索性研究","authors":"Christopher M. Scherpereel,&nbsp;Susan K. Williams,&nbsp;Scott Hoefle","doi":"10.1111/dsji.12259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Studies show that learning is situated—or that learning in one context does not easily transfer to a new context. Because business simulations are often used to provide a learning context, we wondered if this context-specific learning would transfer. To explore this issue, we used situated learning theory to ask undergraduate students in an operations management class to apply their learning in both familiar, simulation contexts, and unfamiliar, nonsimulation contexts. Using contextually based exam questions, we empirically measured learner performance on low and high cognitive effort questions. We were able to provide some support for the constructivist learning theory's hypothesis that learners can take the principles constructed in a business simulation and apply them in other contexts. Additionally, we explored the implications of confidence/self-efficacy theory and demonstrated that transfer may differ based on cognitive effort.</p>","PeriodicalId":46210,"journal":{"name":"Decision Sciences-Journal of Innovative Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The difficulties of context: An exploratory study of learning transfer from a business simulation game\",\"authors\":\"Christopher M. Scherpereel,&nbsp;Susan K. Williams,&nbsp;Scott Hoefle\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dsji.12259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Studies show that learning is situated—or that learning in one context does not easily transfer to a new context. Because business simulations are often used to provide a learning context, we wondered if this context-specific learning would transfer. To explore this issue, we used situated learning theory to ask undergraduate students in an operations management class to apply their learning in both familiar, simulation contexts, and unfamiliar, nonsimulation contexts. Using contextually based exam questions, we empirically measured learner performance on low and high cognitive effort questions. We were able to provide some support for the constructivist learning theory's hypothesis that learners can take the principles constructed in a business simulation and apply them in other contexts. Additionally, we explored the implications of confidence/self-efficacy theory and demonstrated that transfer may differ based on cognitive effort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Decision Sciences-Journal of Innovative Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Decision Sciences-Journal of Innovative Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dsji.12259\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision Sciences-Journal of Innovative Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dsji.12259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究表明,学习是情境化的,或者说,在一种环境中的学习不容易转移到新的环境中。由于商业模拟经常用于提供学习环境,我们想知道这种特定于环境的学习是否会迁移。为了探讨这个问题,我们运用情境学习理论,要求运营管理课程的本科生在熟悉的模拟情境和不熟悉的非模拟情境中应用他们的学习。使用基于上下文的考试问题,我们对学习者在低认知努力和高认知努力问题上的表现进行了实证测量。我们能够为建构主义学习理论的假设提供一些支持,即学习者可以将在商业模拟中构建的原则应用到其他环境中。此外,我们探讨了自信/自我效能理论的含义,并证明迁移可能会因认知努力而有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The difficulties of context: An exploratory study of learning transfer from a business simulation game

Studies show that learning is situated—or that learning in one context does not easily transfer to a new context. Because business simulations are often used to provide a learning context, we wondered if this context-specific learning would transfer. To explore this issue, we used situated learning theory to ask undergraduate students in an operations management class to apply their learning in both familiar, simulation contexts, and unfamiliar, nonsimulation contexts. Using contextually based exam questions, we empirically measured learner performance on low and high cognitive effort questions. We were able to provide some support for the constructivist learning theory's hypothesis that learners can take the principles constructed in a business simulation and apply them in other contexts. Additionally, we explored the implications of confidence/self-efficacy theory and demonstrated that transfer may differ based on cognitive effort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Decision Sciences-Journal of Innovative Education
Decision Sciences-Journal of Innovative Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
36.80%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Learning from the pandemic Training, comfort, and perceived effectiveness: Lessons from the pandemic Game changer: Cloud-based classroom interactions powered by Google Sheets Changes to business faculty perceived skills with online teaching tools and educational practices: The pandemic effect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1