Jing Wang, Ying Zhang, Lili Jiang, Q. Fu, Yanjie Bi, Ru-qian Zhao, H. Bai
{"title":"动力外周置置中心导管与中心静脉导管在造血干细胞移植中的临床效果","authors":"Jing Wang, Ying Zhang, Lili Jiang, Q. Fu, Yanjie Bi, Ru-qian Zhao, H. Bai","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2018.02.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo observed the clinical efficacy and safety of high pressure-resistant double-lumen peripherally inserted central catheter (Power PICC) and central venous catheter (CVC) in patients with stem cell transplantation. \n \n \nMethods \nThis was a matched cross-sectional study with 60 patients with leukemia who were treated with catheterization of central venous (30 cases receiving Power PICC vs. 30 cases receiving CVC) during stem cell transplantation in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chinese PLA General Hospital. Indwelling time, success rate of catheterization, complications, velocity and stem cell engraftment time were recorded and compared between the Power PICC group and CVC group. \n \n \nResults \nThere were significant differences between the two groups on indwelling time [(18.47±4.44)min vs. (14.43±1.72)min, t=3.719, P 0.05). \n \n \nConclusion \nPower PICC performed better than CVC with well tolerability and satisfactory efficacy, which is worthy of promotion and application in the future. \n \n \nKey words: \nPeripherally inserted central catheter; Central venous catheter; Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation","PeriodicalId":9877,"journal":{"name":"中华临床营养杂志","volume":"26 1","pages":"110-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical effect of power peripherally inserted central catheter and central venous catheter in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation\",\"authors\":\"Jing Wang, Ying Zhang, Lili Jiang, Q. Fu, Yanjie Bi, Ru-qian Zhao, H. Bai\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2018.02.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo observed the clinical efficacy and safety of high pressure-resistant double-lumen peripherally inserted central catheter (Power PICC) and central venous catheter (CVC) in patients with stem cell transplantation. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nThis was a matched cross-sectional study with 60 patients with leukemia who were treated with catheterization of central venous (30 cases receiving Power PICC vs. 30 cases receiving CVC) during stem cell transplantation in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chinese PLA General Hospital. Indwelling time, success rate of catheterization, complications, velocity and stem cell engraftment time were recorded and compared between the Power PICC group and CVC group. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThere were significant differences between the two groups on indwelling time [(18.47±4.44)min vs. (14.43±1.72)min, t=3.719, P 0.05). \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nPower PICC performed better than CVC with well tolerability and satisfactory efficacy, which is worthy of promotion and application in the future. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nPeripherally inserted central catheter; Central venous catheter; Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation\",\"PeriodicalId\":9877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华临床营养杂志\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"110-114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华临床营养杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2018.02.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华临床营养杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2018.02.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical effect of power peripherally inserted central catheter and central venous catheter in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Objective
To observed the clinical efficacy and safety of high pressure-resistant double-lumen peripherally inserted central catheter (Power PICC) and central venous catheter (CVC) in patients with stem cell transplantation.
Methods
This was a matched cross-sectional study with 60 patients with leukemia who were treated with catheterization of central venous (30 cases receiving Power PICC vs. 30 cases receiving CVC) during stem cell transplantation in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chinese PLA General Hospital. Indwelling time, success rate of catheterization, complications, velocity and stem cell engraftment time were recorded and compared between the Power PICC group and CVC group.
Results
There were significant differences between the two groups on indwelling time [(18.47±4.44)min vs. (14.43±1.72)min, t=3.719, P 0.05).
Conclusion
Power PICC performed better than CVC with well tolerability and satisfactory efficacy, which is worthy of promotion and application in the future.
Key words:
Peripherally inserted central catheter; Central venous catheter; Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
期刊介绍:
The Chinese Journal of Clinical Nutrition was founded in 1993. It is the first professional academic journal (bimonthly) in my country co-sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association and the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences to disseminate information on clinical nutrition support, nutrient metabolism, the impact of nutrition support on outcomes and "cost-effectiveness", as well as translational medicine and nutrition research. It is also a professional journal of the Chinese Medical Association's Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Branch.
The purpose of the Chinese Journal of Clinical Nutrition is to promote the rapid dissemination of knowledge on nutrient metabolism and the rational application of parenteral and enteral nutrition, focusing on the combination of multidisciplinary and multi-regional field investigations and clinical research. It mainly reports on nutritional risk screening related to the indications of parenteral and enteral nutrition support, "cost-effectiveness" research on nutritional drugs, consensus on clinical nutrition, guidelines, expert reviews, randomized controlled studies, cohort studies, glycoprotein and other nutrient metabolism research, systematic evaluation of clinical research, evidence-based case reports, special reviews, case reports and clinical experience exchanges, etc., and has a special column on new technologies related to the field of clinical nutrition and their clinical applications.