在两极分化时代锻造多元联盟:对德国开放社会的抗议

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE German Politics Pub Date : 2022-02-04 DOI:10.1080/09644008.2021.2023130
Katarina Stjepandić, Elias Steinhilper, Sabrina Zajak
{"title":"在两极分化时代锻造多元联盟:对德国开放社会的抗议","authors":"Katarina Stjepandić, Elias Steinhilper, Sabrina Zajak","doi":"10.1080/09644008.2021.2023130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article analyses the ‘Unteilbar coalition for an open and plural society’ in Germany, as an emblematic case to advance scholarship on cross-movement coalition-building and intersectionality in social movement studies. We argue that migration-related polarisation and an accentuated threat of rising far-right mobilisation has provided a context for progressive social movement organisations in Germany to converge and to engage in a particular kind of boundary spanning. The organisations involved have actively constructed an intersectional variant of ‘political solidarity’ by interlocking diverse socio-political struggles – explicitly moving beyond the topic of migration. In contrast to the common understanding of heterogeneous coalitions, being both challenging and prone to fragmentation, we argue that the boundary spanning work performed during Unteilbar has resulted in the outcome of a sustainable mobilisation capacity, and a fostering of movement solidarity rooted in an ‘intersectional consciousness’.","PeriodicalId":46640,"journal":{"name":"German Politics","volume":"32 1","pages":"469 - 494"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forging Plural Coalitions in Times of Polarisation: Protest for an Open Society in Germany\",\"authors\":\"Katarina Stjepandić, Elias Steinhilper, Sabrina Zajak\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09644008.2021.2023130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article analyses the ‘Unteilbar coalition for an open and plural society’ in Germany, as an emblematic case to advance scholarship on cross-movement coalition-building and intersectionality in social movement studies. We argue that migration-related polarisation and an accentuated threat of rising far-right mobilisation has provided a context for progressive social movement organisations in Germany to converge and to engage in a particular kind of boundary spanning. The organisations involved have actively constructed an intersectional variant of ‘political solidarity’ by interlocking diverse socio-political struggles – explicitly moving beyond the topic of migration. In contrast to the common understanding of heterogeneous coalitions, being both challenging and prone to fragmentation, we argue that the boundary spanning work performed during Unteilbar has resulted in the outcome of a sustainable mobilisation capacity, and a fostering of movement solidarity rooted in an ‘intersectional consciousness’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"German Politics\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"469 - 494\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"German Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2021.2023130\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2021.2023130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要本文分析了德国的“开放多元社会的Unteilbar联盟”,作为推动跨运动联盟建设和社会运动研究交叉性研究的一个象征性案例。我们认为,与移民相关的两极分化和极右翼动员加剧的威胁为德国的进步社会运动组织提供了一个融合和参与特定类型的跨越边界的背景。相关组织通过将不同的社会政治斗争联系起来,积极构建了一种跨部门的“政治团结”变体——明确超越了移民话题。与人们对异质联盟的普遍理解不同,异质联盟既具有挑战性又容易分裂,我们认为,Unteilbar期间开展的跨越边界的工作产生了可持续动员能力的结果,并促进了植根于“交叉意识”的运动团结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Forging Plural Coalitions in Times of Polarisation: Protest for an Open Society in Germany
ABSTRACT This article analyses the ‘Unteilbar coalition for an open and plural society’ in Germany, as an emblematic case to advance scholarship on cross-movement coalition-building and intersectionality in social movement studies. We argue that migration-related polarisation and an accentuated threat of rising far-right mobilisation has provided a context for progressive social movement organisations in Germany to converge and to engage in a particular kind of boundary spanning. The organisations involved have actively constructed an intersectional variant of ‘political solidarity’ by interlocking diverse socio-political struggles – explicitly moving beyond the topic of migration. In contrast to the common understanding of heterogeneous coalitions, being both challenging and prone to fragmentation, we argue that the boundary spanning work performed during Unteilbar has resulted in the outcome of a sustainable mobilisation capacity, and a fostering of movement solidarity rooted in an ‘intersectional consciousness’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
German Politics
German Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Against All Odds? A Discourse Network Analysis of the Political Debate About the German Passenger Car Toll Act German Legislators’ Conceptions of Democracy and Process Preferences: Results from a New Survey Germany’s Triangular Relations with the United States and China in the Era of the Zeitenwende The Effects of Federalism, Corporatism and Legislative Power on Health System Transformation in Germany Erythrocyte fatty acid aberrations in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Correlation with disease duration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1