从单恋到与敌人同床共枕:COVID-19和英国大学与专业会计机构的未来关系

IF 2.4 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Accounting Research Journal Pub Date : 2021-10-24 DOI:10.1108/arj-04-2021-0121
Muhammad Al Mahameed, U. Riaz, Lara Gee
{"title":"从单恋到与敌人同床共枕:COVID-19和英国大学与专业会计机构的未来关系","authors":"Muhammad Al Mahameed, U. Riaz, Lara Gee","doi":"10.1108/arj-04-2021-0121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to examine the effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the relationship between UK universities and professional accounting bodies (PABs) in the context of the accreditation system and how well prepared this relationship was to observe and respond to the pandemic.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe research draws on 10 semi-structured interviews and correspondence, with six English universities in the context of their relationship with three PABs to build an extended analytical structure to understand the nature and extent of the accreditation system in light of COVID-19.\n\n\nFindings\nThe study shows that COVID-19 has highlighted pedagogical and ideological conflicts within the PAB–university relationship. The analysis shows that, in an attempt to resolve these conflicts, universities demonstrate “unrequited love” for PABs by limiting changes to assessments to meet the PABs’ criteria. Indeed, PABs face very little resistance from universities. This further constrains academics by suppressing innovation and limiting their scope to learn and adopt new skills, habits and teaching styles.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe paper highlights the weakness of the PAB–university relationship. Moreover, it shows that rather than using the pandemic crisis to question this relationship, PABs may seek to promote their accounting pedagogy and retain greater control of the accounting curriculum. This can entail the transformation of academics into translators of PABs’ accounting pedagogy rather than exercising academic freedom and promoting critical thinking.\n","PeriodicalId":45591,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Research Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From unrequited love to sleeping with the enemy: COVID-19 and the future relationship between UK universities and professional accounting bodies\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Al Mahameed, U. Riaz, Lara Gee\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/arj-04-2021-0121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis paper aims to examine the effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the relationship between UK universities and professional accounting bodies (PABs) in the context of the accreditation system and how well prepared this relationship was to observe and respond to the pandemic.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe research draws on 10 semi-structured interviews and correspondence, with six English universities in the context of their relationship with three PABs to build an extended analytical structure to understand the nature and extent of the accreditation system in light of COVID-19.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe study shows that COVID-19 has highlighted pedagogical and ideological conflicts within the PAB–university relationship. The analysis shows that, in an attempt to resolve these conflicts, universities demonstrate “unrequited love” for PABs by limiting changes to assessments to meet the PABs’ criteria. Indeed, PABs face very little resistance from universities. This further constrains academics by suppressing innovation and limiting their scope to learn and adopt new skills, habits and teaching styles.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe paper highlights the weakness of the PAB–university relationship. Moreover, it shows that rather than using the pandemic crisis to question this relationship, PABs may seek to promote their accounting pedagogy and retain greater control of the accounting curriculum. This can entail the transformation of academics into translators of PABs’ accounting pedagogy rather than exercising academic freedom and promoting critical thinking.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting Research Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/arj-04-2021-0121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/arj-04-2021-0121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的本文旨在研究2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)在认证体系背景下对英国大学与专业会计机构(PABs)之间关系的影响,以及这种关系在观察和应对疫情方面的准备情况。设计/方法论/方法本研究采用了10次半结构化访谈和信件,在六所英国大学与三所PAB关系的背景下,建立一个扩展的分析结构,以了解新冠肺炎认证系统的性质和范围。研究表明,新冠肺炎突出了PAB与大学关系中的教学和意识形态冲突。分析表明,为了解决这些冲突,大学通过限制评估的变化以满足PABs的标准,表现出对PABs“单恋”。事实上,PAB几乎没有受到大学的抵制。这进一步限制了学术界的创新,限制了他们学习和采用新技能、习惯和教学风格的范围。原创性/价值该论文强调了PAB与大学关系的弱点。此外,这表明,与其利用疫情危机来质疑这种关系,PAB可能会寻求推广其会计教学法,并保留对会计课程的更大控制权。这可能需要学者转变为PABs会计教育学的翻译者,而不是行使学术自由和促进批判性思维。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From unrequited love to sleeping with the enemy: COVID-19 and the future relationship between UK universities and professional accounting bodies
Purpose This paper aims to examine the effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the relationship between UK universities and professional accounting bodies (PABs) in the context of the accreditation system and how well prepared this relationship was to observe and respond to the pandemic. Design/methodology/approach The research draws on 10 semi-structured interviews and correspondence, with six English universities in the context of their relationship with three PABs to build an extended analytical structure to understand the nature and extent of the accreditation system in light of COVID-19. Findings The study shows that COVID-19 has highlighted pedagogical and ideological conflicts within the PAB–university relationship. The analysis shows that, in an attempt to resolve these conflicts, universities demonstrate “unrequited love” for PABs by limiting changes to assessments to meet the PABs’ criteria. Indeed, PABs face very little resistance from universities. This further constrains academics by suppressing innovation and limiting their scope to learn and adopt new skills, habits and teaching styles. Originality/value The paper highlights the weakness of the PAB–university relationship. Moreover, it shows that rather than using the pandemic crisis to question this relationship, PABs may seek to promote their accounting pedagogy and retain greater control of the accounting curriculum. This can entail the transformation of academics into translators of PABs’ accounting pedagogy rather than exercising academic freedom and promoting critical thinking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounting Research Journal
Accounting Research Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
The role of other comprehensive income in analyst valuation: profitability, perception and performance Does aural accounting improve the stakeholder relationship capability? Factors influencing readiness to implement digital audit among internal auditors of the Malaysian public sector Does a CEO from a reputable university create a better working environment? Evidence from Indonesia IFRS-9, expected loan loss provisioning and bank liquidity creation: early evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1