{"title":"专刊导论:人力资源开发理论建构的质性研究方法与方法","authors":"J. Lester","doi":"10.1177/15344843221146871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, social science researchers have had to identify new ways of conceptualizing and conducting research (Nind et al., 2021). This has been particularly true for qualitative researchers, as many have been required to rethink how to study meaning-making practices (e.g., Rahman et al., 2021; VindrolaPadros et al., 2020). This re-thinking has led many qualitative researchers to work with new and emerging digital tools to collect and analyze data, as well as engage with new forms of data in a range of digital spaces (Paulus & Lester, 2022). Some scholars have begun to write and think about how this historical moment might shape how we envision the very doing of qualitative research in the future, while recognizing that qualitative researchers have long been engaged with digital tools and in digital spaces (e.g., Fielding et al., 2008). Indeed, the idea of historical moments shaping methodology is not new to qualitative researchers, as all methodological practices arise at particular socio-political moments and are shaped by the conditions under which they are developed. As Morse (2020) noted:","PeriodicalId":51474,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Development Review","volume":"22 1","pages":"7 - 14"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction to Special Issue: Qualitative Research Methodologies and Methods for Theory Building in Human Resource Development\",\"authors\":\"J. Lester\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15344843221146871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, social science researchers have had to identify new ways of conceptualizing and conducting research (Nind et al., 2021). This has been particularly true for qualitative researchers, as many have been required to rethink how to study meaning-making practices (e.g., Rahman et al., 2021; VindrolaPadros et al., 2020). This re-thinking has led many qualitative researchers to work with new and emerging digital tools to collect and analyze data, as well as engage with new forms of data in a range of digital spaces (Paulus & Lester, 2022). Some scholars have begun to write and think about how this historical moment might shape how we envision the very doing of qualitative research in the future, while recognizing that qualitative researchers have long been engaged with digital tools and in digital spaces (e.g., Fielding et al., 2008). Indeed, the idea of historical moments shaping methodology is not new to qualitative researchers, as all methodological practices arise at particular socio-political moments and are shaped by the conditions under which they are developed. As Morse (2020) noted:\",\"PeriodicalId\":51474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Resource Development Review\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"7 - 14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Resource Development Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843221146871\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Development Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843221146871","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
自COVID-19大流行开始以来,社会科学研究人员不得不确定概念化和开展研究的新方法(Nind等人,2021年)。对于定性研究人员来说尤其如此,因为许多人被要求重新思考如何研究意义生成实践(例如,Rahman等人,2021;VindrolaPadros et al., 2020)。这种重新思考导致许多定性研究人员使用新兴的数字工具来收集和分析数据,并在一系列数字空间中使用新形式的数据(Paulus & Lester, 2022)。一些学者已经开始撰写和思考这一历史时刻如何影响我们对未来定性研究的设想,同时认识到定性研究人员长期以来一直在使用数字工具和数字空间(例如,Fielding等人,2008)。事实上,历史时刻塑造方法论的想法对定性研究人员来说并不新鲜,因为所有的方法论实践都出现在特定的社会政治时刻,并受到它们发展的条件的影响。正如莫尔斯(2020)所指出的:
Introduction to Special Issue: Qualitative Research Methodologies and Methods for Theory Building in Human Resource Development
Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, social science researchers have had to identify new ways of conceptualizing and conducting research (Nind et al., 2021). This has been particularly true for qualitative researchers, as many have been required to rethink how to study meaning-making practices (e.g., Rahman et al., 2021; VindrolaPadros et al., 2020). This re-thinking has led many qualitative researchers to work with new and emerging digital tools to collect and analyze data, as well as engage with new forms of data in a range of digital spaces (Paulus & Lester, 2022). Some scholars have begun to write and think about how this historical moment might shape how we envision the very doing of qualitative research in the future, while recognizing that qualitative researchers have long been engaged with digital tools and in digital spaces (e.g., Fielding et al., 2008). Indeed, the idea of historical moments shaping methodology is not new to qualitative researchers, as all methodological practices arise at particular socio-political moments and are shaped by the conditions under which they are developed. As Morse (2020) noted:
期刊介绍:
As described elsewhere, Human Resource Development Review is a theory development journal for scholars of human resource development and related disciplines. Human Resource Development Review publishes articles that make theoretical contributions on theory development, foundations of HRD, theory building methods, and integrative reviews of the relevant literature. Papers whose central focus is empirical findings, including empirical method and design are not considered for publication in Human Resource Development Review. This journal encourages submissions that provide new theoretical insights to advance our understanding of human resource development and related disciplines. Such papers may include syntheses of existing bodies of theory, new substantive theories, exploratory conceptual models, taxonomies and typology developed as foundations for theory, treatises in formal theory construction, papers on the history of theory, critique of theory that includes alternative research propositions, metatheory, and integrative literature reviews with strong theoretical implications. Papers addressing foundations of HRD might address philosophies of HRD, historical foundations, definitions of the field, conceptual organization of the field, and ethical foundations. Human Resource Development Review takes a multi-paradigm view of theory building so submissions from different paradigms are encouraged.