是什么推动了金融稳定?市场力量与东非共同体银行效率之间的关系

M. Nyangu, N. Marwa, A. Fanta
{"title":"是什么推动了金融稳定?市场力量与东非共同体银行效率之间的关系","authors":"M. Nyangu, N. Marwa, A. Fanta","doi":"10.1080/14765284.2023.2206897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The paper examines the joint effect of market power and different types of bank efficiency on financial stability across 5 countries within the East African Community. Unlike existing studies which have employed efficiency in a broad way, it is decomposed into five different types, that is, technical, pure technical, scale, cost and revenue efficiency. Using a two-step system GMM on 149 banks with 1,805 observations over the period 2001–2018, empirical findings reveal that the joint effect of market power and bank efficiency is critical on financial stability and the effect varies with the specific type of efficiency being explored. Increased market power is observed to have a direct positive effect on bank stability. With respect to bank efficiency, cost and revenue efficiency have a positive significant effect with bank stability while the effect of technical, pure technical and scale efficiency is insignificant. In overall, concentrated banks with higher cost and revenue efficiency are more stable compared to the inefficient banks. The findings highlight that an eclectic policy to ensure a trade-off between bank concentration and competition should be ensured by the bank regulators.","PeriodicalId":45444,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies","volume":"21 1","pages":"403 - 428"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What drives financial stability? the nexus between market power and bank efficiency within the East African Community\",\"authors\":\"M. Nyangu, N. Marwa, A. Fanta\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14765284.2023.2206897\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The paper examines the joint effect of market power and different types of bank efficiency on financial stability across 5 countries within the East African Community. Unlike existing studies which have employed efficiency in a broad way, it is decomposed into five different types, that is, technical, pure technical, scale, cost and revenue efficiency. Using a two-step system GMM on 149 banks with 1,805 observations over the period 2001–2018, empirical findings reveal that the joint effect of market power and bank efficiency is critical on financial stability and the effect varies with the specific type of efficiency being explored. Increased market power is observed to have a direct positive effect on bank stability. With respect to bank efficiency, cost and revenue efficiency have a positive significant effect with bank stability while the effect of technical, pure technical and scale efficiency is insignificant. In overall, concentrated banks with higher cost and revenue efficiency are more stable compared to the inefficient banks. The findings highlight that an eclectic policy to ensure a trade-off between bank concentration and competition should be ensured by the bank regulators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"403 - 428\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2023.2206897\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2023.2206897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了市场力量和不同类型的银行效率对东非共同体5个国家金融稳定的共同影响。不同于现有研究对效率的广泛运用,本文将效率分解为技术效率、纯技术效率、规模效率、成本效率和收益效率五种不同的类型。利用两步系统GMM对149家银行2001-2018年期间的1805个观察结果进行了实证分析,结果表明,市场力量和银行效率的联合效应对金融稳定至关重要,并且影响随所探索的特定效率类型而变化。市场力量的增强对银行稳定性有直接的积极影响。在银行效率方面,成本效率和收益效率对银行稳定性有显著的正向影响,而技术效率、纯技术效率和规模效率的影响不显著。总体而言,成本和收益效率较高的集中型银行相对于效率较低的集中型银行更为稳定。研究结果强调,银行监管机构应确保采取折衷政策,以确保银行集中度与竞争之间的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What drives financial stability? the nexus between market power and bank efficiency within the East African Community
ABSTRACT The paper examines the joint effect of market power and different types of bank efficiency on financial stability across 5 countries within the East African Community. Unlike existing studies which have employed efficiency in a broad way, it is decomposed into five different types, that is, technical, pure technical, scale, cost and revenue efficiency. Using a two-step system GMM on 149 banks with 1,805 observations over the period 2001–2018, empirical findings reveal that the joint effect of market power and bank efficiency is critical on financial stability and the effect varies with the specific type of efficiency being explored. Increased market power is observed to have a direct positive effect on bank stability. With respect to bank efficiency, cost and revenue efficiency have a positive significant effect with bank stability while the effect of technical, pure technical and scale efficiency is insignificant. In overall, concentrated banks with higher cost and revenue efficiency are more stable compared to the inefficient banks. The findings highlight that an eclectic policy to ensure a trade-off between bank concentration and competition should be ensured by the bank regulators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Strategic thinking: the core of investment decision-making in Fund-of-Fund (FoF) Relationship between sharia supervisory board attributes and sustainable development goals (SDGs) financing in Islamic banks Renewable energy made in India: navigating geopolitics in achieving sustainability The linkage between sanctions and infrastructure: How national culture matters The metaverse hype: identifying bubbles and comovements of metaverse tokens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1