不同距离的组合对游泳临界速度的确定有影响吗?

Brian Johan Bustos-Viviescas, Andres Alonso Acevedo-Mindiola, Rafael Enrique Lozano-Zapata
{"title":"不同距离的组合对游泳临界速度的确定有影响吗?","authors":"Brian Johan Bustos-Viviescas, Andres Alonso Acevedo-Mindiola, Rafael Enrique Lozano-Zapata","doi":"10.24310/riccafd.2020.v9i2.6620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the present study was to determine the influence of using different combinations of distances to get the critical speed in swimmers. This descriptive study present a quantitative approach and a convenience sample, the participants were fourteen men (age 15,00±1,63 years old, weight 52,36±7,80 kg, size 163,71±8,52 cm, BMI 19,43±1,27 kg/m2, swimming training experience 2,57±0,53 years) and six women (age 14,00±1,00 years old, weight 51,33±7,23 kg, size 154,00±1,73 cm, BMI 21,68±3,34 kg/m2, swimming training experience 2,33±0,58 years). To determine the critical speed of swimming (CS) were used 11 possible combinations of two distances, three distances and four distances for the different tests evaluated in this study (50 m, 100 m, 200 m and 400 m). For tabulation and data analysis was used the package statistical IBM SPSS V.22 with a 95% confidence level and a p-value of 0.05, applied in this the normality test of Shapiro-Wilk to establish the distribution of the data and the analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine significant differences between the averages of each combination. After analyzing the results, where as evidence is a normal distribution of data (p>0,05), on the other hand there were significant differences in men (p<0,05) and very significant in women (p<0,01) between the means of combinations of two distances with respect to the four distances. It is concluded that the combination of different distances to determine the CS if it significantly influences in this index.","PeriodicalId":42012,"journal":{"name":"Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencias de la Actividad Fisica y el Deporte","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"¿Influye combinar diferentes distancias en la determinación de la velocidad critica de nado?\",\"authors\":\"Brian Johan Bustos-Viviescas, Andres Alonso Acevedo-Mindiola, Rafael Enrique Lozano-Zapata\",\"doi\":\"10.24310/riccafd.2020.v9i2.6620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of the present study was to determine the influence of using different combinations of distances to get the critical speed in swimmers. This descriptive study present a quantitative approach and a convenience sample, the participants were fourteen men (age 15,00±1,63 years old, weight 52,36±7,80 kg, size 163,71±8,52 cm, BMI 19,43±1,27 kg/m2, swimming training experience 2,57±0,53 years) and six women (age 14,00±1,00 years old, weight 51,33±7,23 kg, size 154,00±1,73 cm, BMI 21,68±3,34 kg/m2, swimming training experience 2,33±0,58 years). To determine the critical speed of swimming (CS) were used 11 possible combinations of two distances, three distances and four distances for the different tests evaluated in this study (50 m, 100 m, 200 m and 400 m). For tabulation and data analysis was used the package statistical IBM SPSS V.22 with a 95% confidence level and a p-value of 0.05, applied in this the normality test of Shapiro-Wilk to establish the distribution of the data and the analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine significant differences between the averages of each combination. After analyzing the results, where as evidence is a normal distribution of data (p>0,05), on the other hand there were significant differences in men (p<0,05) and very significant in women (p<0,01) between the means of combinations of two distances with respect to the four distances. It is concluded that the combination of different distances to determine the CS if it significantly influences in this index.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencias de la Actividad Fisica y el Deporte\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencias de la Actividad Fisica y el Deporte\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24310/riccafd.2020.v9i2.6620\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencias de la Actividad Fisica y el Deporte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24310/riccafd.2020.v9i2.6620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究的目的是确定使用不同的距离组合的影响,以获得游泳运动员的临界速度。本描述性研究采用定量方法和方便样本,参与者为14名男性(年龄15,000±1,63岁,体重52,36±7,80 kg,体型163,71±8,52 cm,体重指数19,43±1,27 kg/m2,游泳训练经历2,57±0,53岁)和6名女性(年龄14,000±1,00,体重51,33±7,23 kg,体型154,000±1,73 cm,体重指数21,68±3,34 kg/m2,游泳训练经历2,33±0,58岁)。为了确定游泳的临界速度(CS),我们使用了11种可能的组合,分别是两种距离、三种距离和四种距离,用于本研究评估的不同测试(50米、100米、200米和400米)。制表和数据分析使用IBM SPSS V.22软件包,置信水平为95%,p值为0.05。本文采用Shapiro-Wilk正态性检验来建立数据的分布,并采用方差分析(ANOVA)来确定各组合平均值之间的显著性差异。在分析结果后,作为证据的是数据的正态分布(p< 0.05),另一方面,相对于四个距离,两个距离组合的平均值在男性中有显著差异(p< 0.05),在女性中非常显著(p< 0.01)。得出的结论是,结合不同距离来确定CS是否对该指标有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
¿Influye combinar diferentes distancias en la determinación de la velocidad critica de nado?
The objective of the present study was to determine the influence of using different combinations of distances to get the critical speed in swimmers. This descriptive study present a quantitative approach and a convenience sample, the participants were fourteen men (age 15,00±1,63 years old, weight 52,36±7,80 kg, size 163,71±8,52 cm, BMI 19,43±1,27 kg/m2, swimming training experience 2,57±0,53 years) and six women (age 14,00±1,00 years old, weight 51,33±7,23 kg, size 154,00±1,73 cm, BMI 21,68±3,34 kg/m2, swimming training experience 2,33±0,58 years). To determine the critical speed of swimming (CS) were used 11 possible combinations of two distances, three distances and four distances for the different tests evaluated in this study (50 m, 100 m, 200 m and 400 m). For tabulation and data analysis was used the package statistical IBM SPSS V.22 with a 95% confidence level and a p-value of 0.05, applied in this the normality test of Shapiro-Wilk to establish the distribution of the data and the analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine significant differences between the averages of each combination. After analyzing the results, where as evidence is a normal distribution of data (p>0,05), on the other hand there were significant differences in men (p<0,05) and very significant in women (p<0,01) between the means of combinations of two distances with respect to the four distances. It is concluded that the combination of different distances to determine the CS if it significantly influences in this index.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Relación entre el nivel de condición física y la inteligencia del alumnado de Educación Infantil Evaluación de la capacidad aeróbica en hombres y mujeres universitarios posterior a la pandemia SARS-COV2 Estudio de la condición física en niños y jóvenes con discapacidad Perfil antropométrico, composición corporal y somatotipo en jugadoras de fútbol bandera Recursos divulgativos sobre prevención de lesiones en piscinas en sitios web gubernamentales
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1