新冠肺炎期间,教师对公共卫生高等教育中经常使用自我反思的看法、推动者和障碍-一种混合方法

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Reflective Practice Pub Date : 2023-05-08 DOI:10.1080/14623943.2023.2210066
R. Lim, Claire Gek Ling Tan, Kenneth Wee Beng Hoe, Cecilia Woon Chien Teng, A. Müller, Julian Azfar, S. Narayanasamy, Chee Hsiang Liow
{"title":"新冠肺炎期间,教师对公共卫生高等教育中经常使用自我反思的看法、推动者和障碍-一种混合方法","authors":"R. Lim, Claire Gek Ling Tan, Kenneth Wee Beng Hoe, Cecilia Woon Chien Teng, A. Müller, Julian Azfar, S. Narayanasamy, Chee Hsiang Liow","doi":"10.1080/14623943.2023.2210066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to assess the perceptions as well as to explore the facilitators and barriers to the regular use of self-reflection as a pedagogical tool by teachers in public health education during COVID-19. We used a mixed methods approach, comprising a cross-sectional survey followed by in-depth interviews. Quantitative findings revealed that there was a significantly greater proportion of regular users of self-reflection who knew how to incorporate self-reflection elements in their teaching than the infrequent users. Qualitative findings revealed that a recurring reason for using self-reflection in teaching was to better understand students, given the online classroom environment during COVID-19. Teachers expressed the need for support to sustain the regular use of reflection in teaching. Facilitating factors could be external or internal to the teacher. For external factors, a recurring subtheme was institutional support, indicating that teachers expected support (or at least no objections) from their organisation. For internal factors, perceived positive impacts on students was identified as a recurring subtheme. Several barriers to the regular use of reflection were described. These included external factors such as the lack of peer sharing, as well as internal factors such as the prioritisation of other contents to teach.","PeriodicalId":51594,"journal":{"name":"Reflective Practice","volume":"24 1","pages":"447 - 463"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teachers’ perceptions, facilitators, and barriers to the regular use of self-reflection in public health higher education during COVID-19 — a mixed methods approach\",\"authors\":\"R. Lim, Claire Gek Ling Tan, Kenneth Wee Beng Hoe, Cecilia Woon Chien Teng, A. Müller, Julian Azfar, S. Narayanasamy, Chee Hsiang Liow\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14623943.2023.2210066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to assess the perceptions as well as to explore the facilitators and barriers to the regular use of self-reflection as a pedagogical tool by teachers in public health education during COVID-19. We used a mixed methods approach, comprising a cross-sectional survey followed by in-depth interviews. Quantitative findings revealed that there was a significantly greater proportion of regular users of self-reflection who knew how to incorporate self-reflection elements in their teaching than the infrequent users. Qualitative findings revealed that a recurring reason for using self-reflection in teaching was to better understand students, given the online classroom environment during COVID-19. Teachers expressed the need for support to sustain the regular use of reflection in teaching. Facilitating factors could be external or internal to the teacher. For external factors, a recurring subtheme was institutional support, indicating that teachers expected support (or at least no objections) from their organisation. For internal factors, perceived positive impacts on students was identified as a recurring subtheme. Several barriers to the regular use of reflection were described. These included external factors such as the lack of peer sharing, as well as internal factors such as the prioritisation of other contents to teach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reflective Practice\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"447 - 463\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reflective Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2023.2210066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reflective Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2023.2210066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估新冠肺炎期间教师在公共卫生教育中定期使用自我反思作为教学工具的看法,并探讨其促进因素和障碍。我们采用了混合方法,包括横断面调查和深度访谈。定量调查结果显示,经常进行自我反思的学生中,知道如何在教学中融入自我反思元素的比例明显高于不经常进行自我反思的学生。定性调查结果显示,鉴于2019冠状病毒病期间的在线课堂环境,在教学中使用自我反思的一个常见原因是为了更好地了解学生。教师们表示需要支持,以维持在教学中经常使用反思。促进因素可以是外部的,也可以是内部的。对于外部因素,一个反复出现的次要主题是机构支持,表明教师期望从他们的组织得到支持(或至少没有反对意见)。对于内部因素,对学生的感知积极影响被确定为反复出现的子主题。描述了经常使用反射的几个障碍。这些因素包括外部因素,如缺乏同侪分享,以及内部因素,如其他教学内容的优先顺序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Teachers’ perceptions, facilitators, and barriers to the regular use of self-reflection in public health higher education during COVID-19 — a mixed methods approach
ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to assess the perceptions as well as to explore the facilitators and barriers to the regular use of self-reflection as a pedagogical tool by teachers in public health education during COVID-19. We used a mixed methods approach, comprising a cross-sectional survey followed by in-depth interviews. Quantitative findings revealed that there was a significantly greater proportion of regular users of self-reflection who knew how to incorporate self-reflection elements in their teaching than the infrequent users. Qualitative findings revealed that a recurring reason for using self-reflection in teaching was to better understand students, given the online classroom environment during COVID-19. Teachers expressed the need for support to sustain the regular use of reflection in teaching. Facilitating factors could be external or internal to the teacher. For external factors, a recurring subtheme was institutional support, indicating that teachers expected support (or at least no objections) from their organisation. For internal factors, perceived positive impacts on students was identified as a recurring subtheme. Several barriers to the regular use of reflection were described. These included external factors such as the lack of peer sharing, as well as internal factors such as the prioritisation of other contents to teach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reflective Practice
Reflective Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Doing cross-cultural interviews from Vietnamese students’ experience and reflective practice: lessons on intercultural communicative competence Reflection tools – support for patient learning in group education What does inclusion look like within an experiential teaching and assessing reflective learning model? Utilising authentic assessment to foster shared social membership Investigating the development of peer-led asynchronous digitally mediated feedback in higher education: three case studies On the journey from cognizance toward thriving: Iranian EFL teachers’ engagement in reflective practice and professional development: the mediating effect of teacher mindfulness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1