Keutamaan世界贸易组织的区域贸易协定是国际贸易协定

A.D. Agung Sulistyo
{"title":"Keutamaan世界贸易组织的区域贸易协定是国际贸易协定","authors":"A.D. Agung Sulistyo","doi":"10.24002/jep.v37i2.4381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The economic and political needs of countries in the world have provided a strong basis for the birth of the World Trade Organization (WTO). This need has also prompted many countries to form preferential agreements such as the Regional Trade Agreement (RTA). A clash between the two international trading systems is inevitable, there is the ambiguity of the relationship and inconsistency of views held, such as in discriminatory and non-discriminatory approaches. Doctrinal research was conducted to find out which agreement should take precedence over the two legal regimes. This paper concludes that international legal provisions favor the WTO Agreement over preferential agreements such as the RTA. Thus, an RTA that does not conform to the WTO legal regime should be considered contradictory.","PeriodicalId":52874,"journal":{"name":"Justitia Et Pax","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"KEUTAMAAN WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION ATAS REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS DALAM PERDAGANGAN INTERNASIONAL\",\"authors\":\"A.D. Agung Sulistyo\",\"doi\":\"10.24002/jep.v37i2.4381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The economic and political needs of countries in the world have provided a strong basis for the birth of the World Trade Organization (WTO). This need has also prompted many countries to form preferential agreements such as the Regional Trade Agreement (RTA). A clash between the two international trading systems is inevitable, there is the ambiguity of the relationship and inconsistency of views held, such as in discriminatory and non-discriminatory approaches. Doctrinal research was conducted to find out which agreement should take precedence over the two legal regimes. This paper concludes that international legal provisions favor the WTO Agreement over preferential agreements such as the RTA. Thus, an RTA that does not conform to the WTO legal regime should be considered contradictory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Justitia Et Pax\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Justitia Et Pax\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v37i2.4381\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Justitia Et Pax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v37i2.4381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界各国的经济和政治需要为世界贸易组织(WTO)的诞生提供了强有力的基础。这种需要也促使许多国家缔结了诸如《区域贸易协定》之类的优惠协定。两种国际贸易制度之间的冲突是不可避免的,存在着关系的模糊性和所持观点的不一致,例如在歧视性和非歧视性做法方面。进行了理论研究,以找出哪一项协议应优先于两种法律制度。本文的结论是,国际法律规定更倾向于WTO协定,而不是RTA等优惠协定。因此,不符合世贸组织法律制度的区域贸易协定应被认为是矛盾的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
KEUTAMAAN WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION ATAS REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS DALAM PERDAGANGAN INTERNASIONAL
The economic and political needs of countries in the world have provided a strong basis for the birth of the World Trade Organization (WTO). This need has also prompted many countries to form preferential agreements such as the Regional Trade Agreement (RTA). A clash between the two international trading systems is inevitable, there is the ambiguity of the relationship and inconsistency of views held, such as in discriminatory and non-discriminatory approaches. Doctrinal research was conducted to find out which agreement should take precedence over the two legal regimes. This paper concludes that international legal provisions favor the WTO Agreement over preferential agreements such as the RTA. Thus, an RTA that does not conform to the WTO legal regime should be considered contradictory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
PENGUATAN NORMA SYARAT DISPENSASI KAWIN DALAM UPAYA PENCEGAHAN PERKAWINAN ANAK BERDASARKAN PERSPEKTIF TEORI TUJUAN HUKUM REVIEWING THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ON DEMOCRATIC ELECTION PRACTICES IN INDONESIA AND THE PHILIPPINES PENYADAPAN DALAM TINDAK PIDANA TERORISME DI INDONESIA DAN FILIPINA DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA REFORMULASI PENETRATION STRESS TEST SEBAGAI PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DATA PRIBADI KONSUMEN DI ERA BISNIS DIGITAL TINJAUAN KRIMINOLOGIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN KERBAU DI WILAYAH HUKUM KEPOLISIAN RESOR SUMBA BARAT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1