中国式证券投资者保护集体诉讼机制:背景、内容、比较与后果

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW Asia Pacific Law Review Pub Date : 2022-05-26 DOI:10.1080/10192557.2022.2073907
Fa Chen
{"title":"中国式证券投资者保护集体诉讼机制:背景、内容、比较与后果","authors":"Fa Chen","doi":"10.1080/10192557.2022.2073907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In December 2019, the modification of the Securities Law of China created a Chinese-style securities class action mechanism, namely the special securities representative action (SSRA) mechanism, which provided investors with a new route to private enforcement by enabling them to launch claims against wrongdoers in a single lawsuit. On 12 November 2021, the court ruled the spotlight-catching first SSRA, i.e. the Kangmei case, opening the chapter of the use of the SSRA mechanism in practice. This article conducts a close examination of the SSRA mechanism, discussing the context of introducing this mechanism and its functioning, comparing it with the US securities class action mechanism as a global counterpart and looking into the effectiveness of the SSRA mechanism for investor protection in practice. This article finds that the SSRA mechanism is carefully designed to solve the problem that most Chinese investors lack the incentive and capacity of litigation engagement, which has been proven effective for investor protection in the Kangmei case.","PeriodicalId":42799,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Law Review","volume":"30 1","pages":"287 - 308"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Chinese-style securities class action mechanism for investor protection: context, content, comparison and consequence\",\"authors\":\"Fa Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10192557.2022.2073907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In December 2019, the modification of the Securities Law of China created a Chinese-style securities class action mechanism, namely the special securities representative action (SSRA) mechanism, which provided investors with a new route to private enforcement by enabling them to launch claims against wrongdoers in a single lawsuit. On 12 November 2021, the court ruled the spotlight-catching first SSRA, i.e. the Kangmei case, opening the chapter of the use of the SSRA mechanism in practice. This article conducts a close examination of the SSRA mechanism, discussing the context of introducing this mechanism and its functioning, comparing it with the US securities class action mechanism as a global counterpart and looking into the effectiveness of the SSRA mechanism for investor protection in practice. This article finds that the SSRA mechanism is carefully designed to solve the problem that most Chinese investors lack the incentive and capacity of litigation engagement, which has been proven effective for investor protection in the Kangmei case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Law Review\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"287 - 308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2022.2073907\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2022.2073907","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要2019年12月,我国《证券法》的修改建立了一种中国式的证券集体诉讼机制,即证券特别代表人诉讼机制,使投资者能够在一次诉讼中对不法分子提起诉讼,从而为私人执行提供了一条新途径。2021年11月12日,法院裁定了引人注目的第一个SSRA,即康美案,开启了SSRA机制在实践中的使用篇章。本文对SSRA机制进行了仔细的研究,讨论了引入该机制的背景及其运作,将其与作为全球对应机制的美国证券集体诉讼机制进行了比较,并探讨了SSRA机制在实践中对投资者保护的有效性。本文发现,SSRA机制是为解决大多数中国投资者缺乏诉讼参与动机和能力的问题而精心设计的,在康美案中已被证明对投资者保护是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Chinese-style securities class action mechanism for investor protection: context, content, comparison and consequence
ABSTRACT In December 2019, the modification of the Securities Law of China created a Chinese-style securities class action mechanism, namely the special securities representative action (SSRA) mechanism, which provided investors with a new route to private enforcement by enabling them to launch claims against wrongdoers in a single lawsuit. On 12 November 2021, the court ruled the spotlight-catching first SSRA, i.e. the Kangmei case, opening the chapter of the use of the SSRA mechanism in practice. This article conducts a close examination of the SSRA mechanism, discussing the context of introducing this mechanism and its functioning, comparing it with the US securities class action mechanism as a global counterpart and looking into the effectiveness of the SSRA mechanism for investor protection in practice. This article finds that the SSRA mechanism is carefully designed to solve the problem that most Chinese investors lack the incentive and capacity of litigation engagement, which has been proven effective for investor protection in the Kangmei case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊最新文献
Constitutional foundings in Northeast Asia Constitutional democracy in Indonesia Authoritarianism and legality Asia-Pacific trusts law Volume 1 theory and practice in context Varieties of authoritarian legality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1