基本选择与道德认识论的神学思考

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION Nova Prisutnost Pub Date : 2022-07-15 DOI:10.31192/np.20.2.14
B. Matos
{"title":"基本选择与道德认识论的神学思考","authors":"B. Matos","doi":"10.31192/np.20.2.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper analyses the justification of personal integrity in ethical theories in contemporary moral epistemology. In the first chapter we present a theological consideration of the fundamental option that illustrates the complexity of agency of moral knowledge in the epistemic evaluation of a moral act as a specifically human conduct. Then, in the second chapter we briefly describe the inference and the structure of moral knowledge in ethical theories. In the last chapter, we argue why our personal integrity, our own understanding of it in self-estimation is related to the possibility of moral knowledge. We claim that moral knowledge is crucial in development of moral integrity of a person. The speculations on the possibility of their inference and cognitive capacity reflect on the epistemic disposition of the human being as a moral agent. Although ethical theories have offered a scientifically and methodologically precise frame to justify the truthfulness of moral knowledge and judgments, they have not anticipated the important fact of integrity between the intention, free will and practical reason.","PeriodicalId":52045,"journal":{"name":"Nova Prisutnost","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Theological Consideration of the Fundamental Option and Moral Epistemology\",\"authors\":\"B. Matos\",\"doi\":\"10.31192/np.20.2.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper analyses the justification of personal integrity in ethical theories in contemporary moral epistemology. In the first chapter we present a theological consideration of the fundamental option that illustrates the complexity of agency of moral knowledge in the epistemic evaluation of a moral act as a specifically human conduct. Then, in the second chapter we briefly describe the inference and the structure of moral knowledge in ethical theories. In the last chapter, we argue why our personal integrity, our own understanding of it in self-estimation is related to the possibility of moral knowledge. We claim that moral knowledge is crucial in development of moral integrity of a person. The speculations on the possibility of their inference and cognitive capacity reflect on the epistemic disposition of the human being as a moral agent. Although ethical theories have offered a scientifically and methodologically precise frame to justify the truthfulness of moral knowledge and judgments, they have not anticipated the important fact of integrity between the intention, free will and practical reason.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nova Prisutnost\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nova Prisutnost\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31192/np.20.2.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nova Prisutnost","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31192/np.20.2.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了当代道德认识论伦理理论中人格完整性的正当性。在第一章中,我们提出了一个基本选择的神学考虑,说明了道德知识在作为特定人类行为的道德行为的认识论评价中的代理的复杂性。第二章简要介绍了伦理理论中道德知识的推理和结构。在最后一章中,我们讨论了为什么我们的个人诚信,我们在自我评价中对它的理解与道德知识的可能性有关。我们认为道德知识对一个人的道德完整性的发展至关重要。对其推理可能性和认知能力的推测反映了人作为道德主体的认知倾向。尽管伦理理论在科学和方法论上提供了一个精确的框架来证明道德知识和判断的真实性,但它们并没有预见到意图、自由意志和实践理性之间的完整性这一重要事实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Theological Consideration of the Fundamental Option and Moral Epistemology
The paper analyses the justification of personal integrity in ethical theories in contemporary moral epistemology. In the first chapter we present a theological consideration of the fundamental option that illustrates the complexity of agency of moral knowledge in the epistemic evaluation of a moral act as a specifically human conduct. Then, in the second chapter we briefly describe the inference and the structure of moral knowledge in ethical theories. In the last chapter, we argue why our personal integrity, our own understanding of it in self-estimation is related to the possibility of moral knowledge. We claim that moral knowledge is crucial in development of moral integrity of a person. The speculations on the possibility of their inference and cognitive capacity reflect on the epistemic disposition of the human being as a moral agent. Although ethical theories have offered a scientifically and methodologically precise frame to justify the truthfulness of moral knowledge and judgments, they have not anticipated the important fact of integrity between the intention, free will and practical reason.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nova Prisutnost
Nova Prisutnost RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Education in Ancient India as a Possible Inspiration for the Future Percepcija uloge i osobina razrednika u hrvatskom obrazovnom sustavu Priče i pripovijedanje u ranom učenju engleskoga jezika – komparativna analiza Pripremljenost budućih učitelja razredne nastave i učitelja stranih jezika za ophođenje s različitosti u primarnom obrazovanju Važnost i aktualnost tragične misli u kontekstu starih i novih ideologija progresa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1