跨职能团队合作的影响因素:系统的文献综述

IF 1.4 Q2 Social Sciences Performance Improvement Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.56811/piq-21-0037
Anh Don Ton, Laszlo Hammerl, Gábor Szabó-Szentgróti
{"title":"跨职能团队合作的影响因素:系统的文献综述","authors":"Anh Don Ton, Laszlo Hammerl, Gábor Szabó-Szentgróti","doi":"10.56811/piq-21-0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In practice, cross-functional teams often fail due to misleading coordination in a coopetitive tension. To provide a conceptual foundation and identify promising avenues for future research in the important field of team coopetition, this article reviews the existing literature on the factors of cross-functional team coopetition. This study provides a comprehensive systematic review of studies published in leading peer-reviewed journals from 2010–2021 and identifies 25 articles that fall within its established search inclusion criteria. The literature review highlighted several aspects related to team coopetition. The findings of the study revealed a high number of articles published in the field of industrial marketing. Most studies can be categorized into four outcomes: performance, relationship, knowledge and innovation. Team coopetition is an emerging topic across the globe in management literature, and there is a lack of research on innovation outcomes. Furthermore, several factors from the derived literature significantly influence the outcomes. This study is one of the first systematic studies that describe the in-depth analysis of team coopetition. The significant contributions of this study are to provide a conceptual foundation and identify success factors of team coopetition promising avenues for future research.","PeriodicalId":45620,"journal":{"name":"Performance Improvement Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FACTORS OF CROSS-FUNCTIONAL TEAM COOPETITION: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW\",\"authors\":\"Anh Don Ton, Laszlo Hammerl, Gábor Szabó-Szentgróti\",\"doi\":\"10.56811/piq-21-0037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In practice, cross-functional teams often fail due to misleading coordination in a coopetitive tension. To provide a conceptual foundation and identify promising avenues for future research in the important field of team coopetition, this article reviews the existing literature on the factors of cross-functional team coopetition. This study provides a comprehensive systematic review of studies published in leading peer-reviewed journals from 2010–2021 and identifies 25 articles that fall within its established search inclusion criteria. The literature review highlighted several aspects related to team coopetition. The findings of the study revealed a high number of articles published in the field of industrial marketing. Most studies can be categorized into four outcomes: performance, relationship, knowledge and innovation. Team coopetition is an emerging topic across the globe in management literature, and there is a lack of research on innovation outcomes. Furthermore, several factors from the derived literature significantly influence the outcomes. This study is one of the first systematic studies that describe the in-depth analysis of team coopetition. The significant contributions of this study are to provide a conceptual foundation and identify success factors of team coopetition promising avenues for future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Performance Improvement Quarterly\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Performance Improvement Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56811/piq-21-0037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Performance Improvement Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56811/piq-21-0037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在实践中,跨职能团队往往会因为在竞争紧张的情况下进行误导性的协调而失败。为了为团队合作竞争这一重要领域的未来研究提供概念基础并确定有希望的途径,本文回顾了关于跨职能团队合作竞争因素的现有文献。这项研究对2010-2021年发表在领先同行评审期刊上的研究进行了全面系统的综述,并确定了25篇符合既定搜索纳入标准的文章。文献综述强调了与团队合作竞争有关的几个方面。研究结果显示,在工业营销领域发表了大量文章。大多数研究可以分为四个结果:表现、关系、知识和创新。团队合作竞争是全球管理文献中的一个新兴话题,但缺乏对创新成果的研究。此外,衍生文献中的几个因素对结果有显著影响。本研究是最早对团队合作竞争进行深入分析的系统研究之一。本研究的重要贡献是为团队合作竞争的成功因素提供了概念基础,为未来的研究提供了有希望的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FACTORS OF CROSS-FUNCTIONAL TEAM COOPETITION: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
In practice, cross-functional teams often fail due to misleading coordination in a coopetitive tension. To provide a conceptual foundation and identify promising avenues for future research in the important field of team coopetition, this article reviews the existing literature on the factors of cross-functional team coopetition. This study provides a comprehensive systematic review of studies published in leading peer-reviewed journals from 2010–2021 and identifies 25 articles that fall within its established search inclusion criteria. The literature review highlighted several aspects related to team coopetition. The findings of the study revealed a high number of articles published in the field of industrial marketing. Most studies can be categorized into four outcomes: performance, relationship, knowledge and innovation. Team coopetition is an emerging topic across the globe in management literature, and there is a lack of research on innovation outcomes. Furthermore, several factors from the derived literature significantly influence the outcomes. This study is one of the first systematic studies that describe the in-depth analysis of team coopetition. The significant contributions of this study are to provide a conceptual foundation and identify success factors of team coopetition promising avenues for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Performance Improvement Quarterly
Performance Improvement Quarterly INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: Performance Improvement Quarterly is an official publication of the International Society for Performance Improvement. Founded in 1962, the International Society for Performance Improvement (ISPI) is the leading international association dedicated to improving productivity and performance in the workplace. ISPI represents more than 10,000 international and chapter members throughout the United States, Canada, and 40 other countries. ISPI"s mission is to develop and recognize the proficiency of our members and advocate the use of Human Performance Technology. Assembling an Annual Conference & Expo and other educational events like the Institute, publishing books and periodicals, and supporting research are some of the ways ISPI works toward achieving this mission.
期刊最新文献
CASE STUDY AS A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY SPECIAL FEATURE: KNOW YOUR COLLEAGUES—ROSE BAKER AND JOHN TURNER ROOT CAUSES OF MISROLL IN REROLLING MILLS EMPLOYEES' PERFORMANCE, WORK ORGANIZATION CONDITIONS AND HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN THE ERA OF CRISIS: THE ROLE OF EMOTIONAL EXHAUSTION AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMUNICATION EDITOR'S NOTES—CONTRIBUTION AND REJECTION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1