(?)可见:柬埔寨暴行遗址的选择性、可见性和真实性

IF 2.6 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of Genocide Research Pub Date : 2021-07-09 DOI:10.1080/14623528.2021.1950284
Cheryl Lawther, R. Killean, Lauren Dempster
{"title":"(?)可见:柬埔寨暴行遗址的选择性、可见性和真实性","authors":"Cheryl Lawther, R. Killean, Lauren Dempster","doi":"10.1080/14623528.2021.1950284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines victim representation in former atrocity sites in Cambodia. It concentrates on Tuol Sleng and Choeung Ek, two prominent sites for the detention and torture of suspected enemies of the Khmer Rouge (KR) regime and the subsequent creation of mass graves. These sites of trauma, memory, and transitional justice are inextricably linked to the experiences of victims. Yet, the voice of victims, their visibility, and authentic representations of the past are not always centred in Cambodia’s atrocity sites. Drawing on empirical fieldwork in Cambodia and an interdisciplinary literature, this article interrogates the intersections between selectivity, visibility, and authenticity in sites of atrocity associated with the Cambodian genocide. As this paper demonstrates, engaging with these themes of selectivity, visibility, and authenticity, and by extension issues of, for example, “who” is recognized as a victim, “how” responsibility for past horrors is represented, “which” sites become tourist facing attractions, and “why” certain narratives of the past are prioritized, is essential to recognizing the rights, humanity, and dignity of victims and survivors.","PeriodicalId":46849,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genocide Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"45 - 70"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14623528.2021.1950284","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making (In?)Visible: Selectivity, Visibility and Authenticity in Cambodia’s Sites of Atrocity\",\"authors\":\"Cheryl Lawther, R. Killean, Lauren Dempster\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14623528.2021.1950284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article examines victim representation in former atrocity sites in Cambodia. It concentrates on Tuol Sleng and Choeung Ek, two prominent sites for the detention and torture of suspected enemies of the Khmer Rouge (KR) regime and the subsequent creation of mass graves. These sites of trauma, memory, and transitional justice are inextricably linked to the experiences of victims. Yet, the voice of victims, their visibility, and authentic representations of the past are not always centred in Cambodia’s atrocity sites. Drawing on empirical fieldwork in Cambodia and an interdisciplinary literature, this article interrogates the intersections between selectivity, visibility, and authenticity in sites of atrocity associated with the Cambodian genocide. As this paper demonstrates, engaging with these themes of selectivity, visibility, and authenticity, and by extension issues of, for example, “who” is recognized as a victim, “how” responsibility for past horrors is represented, “which” sites become tourist facing attractions, and “why” certain narratives of the past are prioritized, is essential to recognizing the rights, humanity, and dignity of victims and survivors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Genocide Research\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"45 - 70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14623528.2021.1950284\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Genocide Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2021.1950284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genocide Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2021.1950284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文考察了柬埔寨前暴行现场的受害者代表性。它集中在Tuol Sleng和Choeung Ek,这两个著名的地方关押和折磨红色高棉政权的可疑敌人,并随后建造了乱葬坑。这些创伤、记忆和过渡时期司法的场所与受害者的经历密不可分。然而,受害者的声音、他们的知名度和对过去的真实再现并不总是集中在柬埔寨的暴行现场。本文借鉴柬埔寨的实地调查和跨学科文献,探讨了与柬埔寨种族灭绝有关的暴行现场的选择性、可见性和真实性之间的交叉点。正如本文所表明的,参与这些选择性、可见性和真实性的主题,并通过扩展的问题,例如,“谁”被承认为受害者,“如何表达对过去恐怖的责任”,哪些“景点成为面向游客的景点,以及“为什么”对过去的某些叙述被优先考虑,对于承认这些权利至关重要,以及受害者和幸存者的尊严。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Making (In?)Visible: Selectivity, Visibility and Authenticity in Cambodia’s Sites of Atrocity
ABSTRACT This article examines victim representation in former atrocity sites in Cambodia. It concentrates on Tuol Sleng and Choeung Ek, two prominent sites for the detention and torture of suspected enemies of the Khmer Rouge (KR) regime and the subsequent creation of mass graves. These sites of trauma, memory, and transitional justice are inextricably linked to the experiences of victims. Yet, the voice of victims, their visibility, and authentic representations of the past are not always centred in Cambodia’s atrocity sites. Drawing on empirical fieldwork in Cambodia and an interdisciplinary literature, this article interrogates the intersections between selectivity, visibility, and authenticity in sites of atrocity associated with the Cambodian genocide. As this paper demonstrates, engaging with these themes of selectivity, visibility, and authenticity, and by extension issues of, for example, “who” is recognized as a victim, “how” responsibility for past horrors is represented, “which” sites become tourist facing attractions, and “why” certain narratives of the past are prioritized, is essential to recognizing the rights, humanity, and dignity of victims and survivors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Genocide Research
Journal of Genocide Research POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
“An Asiatic Deed”: The Cambodian Genocide and the West German Right, Or a Study of an Illiberal Variant of Multidirectional Memory Inescapably Genocidal The International Administration of Territory as an Interim Peace Introduction: The Russian Invasion of Ukraine When the Head of State Makes Rape Jokes, His Troops Rape on the Ground: Conflict-Related Sexual Violence in Russia’s Aggression against Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1