实践模拟和目标结构化专业评估在学校心理学培训中的价值：参与者视角

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of School and Educational Psychology Pub Date : 2020-12-16 DOI:10.1080/21683603.2019.1605953

S. Dunsmuir, C. Atkinson, J. Lang, Sarah M. Wright

{"title":"实践模拟和目标结构化专业评估在学校心理学培训中的价值：参与者视角","authors":"S. Dunsmuir, C. Atkinson, J. Lang, Sarah M. Wright","doi":"10.1080/21683603.2019.1605953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper explores trainee educational psychology doctoral students’ experiences of Objective Structured Professional Assessments (OSPAs), implemented at three UK universities and involving participation in a series of timed, simulated scenarios. Focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed, and subjected to thematic analysis. Themes linked with cognitions included identification of learning processes (reflection, discovery, reception) or practical constraints (authenticity and timing of scenarios). Statements of emotion included positive responses (containment, reassurance, and relief) as well as more adverse reactions to the experience (anxiety and anger). Overall, the findings suggest that many students valued OSPAs as worthwhile and useful in developing professional competencies.","PeriodicalId":52157,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of School and Educational Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21683603.2019.1605953","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The value of practice simulations and Objective Structured Professional Assessments (OSPAs) for school psychology training: Participant perspectives\",\"authors\":\"S. Dunsmuir, C. Atkinson, J. Lang, Sarah M. Wright\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21683603.2019.1605953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper explores trainee educational psychology doctoral students’ experiences of Objective Structured Professional Assessments (OSPAs), implemented at three UK universities and involving participation in a series of timed, simulated scenarios. Focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed, and subjected to thematic analysis. Themes linked with cognitions included identification of learning processes (reflection, discovery, reception) or practical constraints (authenticity and timing of scenarios). Statements of emotion included positive responses (containment, reassurance, and relief) as well as more adverse reactions to the experience (anxiety and anger). Overall, the findings suggest that many students valued OSPAs as worthwhile and useful in developing professional competencies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of School and Educational Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21683603.2019.1605953\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of School and Educational Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2019.1605953\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of School and Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2019.1605953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文探讨了英国三所大学实施的目标结构化专业评估（OSPA）的实习教育心理学博士生的经历，该评估涉及一系列定时模拟场景。对焦点小组进行录音、转录和专题分析。与认知相关的主题包括识别学习过程（反思、发现、接受）或实践约束（场景的真实性和时机）。情绪陈述包括积极的反应（遏制、安抚和缓解）以及对经历的更多负面反应（焦虑和愤怒）。总体而言，研究结果表明，许多学生认为OSPA在培养专业能力方面是有价值和有用的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

The value of practice simulations and Objective Structured Professional Assessments (OSPAs) for school psychology training: Participant perspectives

ABSTRACT This paper explores trainee educational psychology doctoral students’ experiences of Objective Structured Professional Assessments (OSPAs), implemented at three UK universities and involving participation in a series of timed, simulated scenarios. Focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed, and subjected to thematic analysis. Themes linked with cognitions included identification of learning processes (reflection, discovery, reception) or practical constraints (authenticity and timing of scenarios). Statements of emotion included positive responses (containment, reassurance, and relief) as well as more adverse reactions to the experience (anxiety and anger). Overall, the findings suggest that many students valued OSPAs as worthwhile and useful in developing professional competencies.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Journal of School and Educational Psychology Social Sciences-Education

CiteScore

4.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The International Journal of School & Educational Psychology (IJSEP) is the official journal of The International School Psychology Association (ISPA) and is a broad-based, interdisciplinary journal addressing issues of professional importance to the success of children, youth, and families in academics and in life. IJSEP seeks to bridge the gap in psychological and evidence-based practices in schools, and senior practitioners alike are invited to contribute papers to the journal. The Editor-in-Chief, Editors, and Editorial Board are made up of prominent scientists, scholars, and senior practitioners from around the world, and include eminent international and multidisciplinary reviewers who make recommendations about what articles should be published. The journal is unique in that it attempts to include the views of different individuals, and also seek to assist new researchers and practitioners in developing their scholarship. IJSEP follows a rigorous and double-blind anonymous peer review process and requires authors to meet all stylistic and ethical guidelines put forth in the most recent APA Publication Manual. The journal accepts empirical papers using quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method methodologies that contribute to the knowledge base of any critical, international school or educational issues. Emphasizing the publication of outstanding research articles, IJSEP also considers literature reviews, methodological or theoretical statements related to teaching, learning, schooling, cross-cultural psychology, school psychological services, applied educational psychology, educational research, assessment, new models of instruction, and other school-related areas. While we realize that most learning takes place between ages 0 and 21, IJSEP also focuses on adult learning, special education services with individuals of all ages, and learning and schooling across the life-span.