南非的冠状病毒和移民治理:一切照旧?

IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Africa Spectrum Pub Date : 2020-04-01 DOI:10.1177/0002039720925826
F. Zanker, Khangelani Moyo
{"title":"南非的冠状病毒和移民治理:一切照旧?","authors":"F. Zanker, Khangelani Moyo","doi":"10.1177/0002039720925826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The South African response in dealing with the Corona pandemic needs to speak to the realities of all people living in the country, including migrant and refugee communities. Reflecting on this in light of ongoing research on the political stakes of migration governance, we find that the virus response shows little change in the government agenda when it comes to dealing with refugees and other migrants. Veritably, we see that the pandemic may even be an excuse for pushing through already-aspired to policies. This includes the securitised agenda behind the sudden building of a border fence to close off Zimbabwe and the xenophobic-rhetorical clout behind the lockdown rules about which shops are allowed to remain open. The temporary stay on renewing asylum seekers permits counts as a perfunctory exception. We show that each of these developments very much play into politics as usual.","PeriodicalId":45570,"journal":{"name":"Africa Spectrum","volume":"55 1","pages":"100 - 112"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0002039720925826","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Corona Virus and Migration Governance in South Africa: Business As Usual?\",\"authors\":\"F. Zanker, Khangelani Moyo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0002039720925826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The South African response in dealing with the Corona pandemic needs to speak to the realities of all people living in the country, including migrant and refugee communities. Reflecting on this in light of ongoing research on the political stakes of migration governance, we find that the virus response shows little change in the government agenda when it comes to dealing with refugees and other migrants. Veritably, we see that the pandemic may even be an excuse for pushing through already-aspired to policies. This includes the securitised agenda behind the sudden building of a border fence to close off Zimbabwe and the xenophobic-rhetorical clout behind the lockdown rules about which shops are allowed to remain open. The temporary stay on renewing asylum seekers permits counts as a perfunctory exception. We show that each of these developments very much play into politics as usual.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Africa Spectrum\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"100 - 112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0002039720925826\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Africa Spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0002039720925826\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africa Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0002039720925826","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

南非应对冠状病毒大流行的对策需要考虑到生活在该国的所有人,包括移民和难民社区的现实。鉴于正在进行的关于移民治理的政治利害关系的研究,我们发现,在处理难民和其他移民问题时,病毒应对措施显示政府议程几乎没有变化。的确,我们看到,这场大流行病甚至可能成为推动已经渴望的政策的借口。这包括突然修建边境围栏以封锁津巴布韦背后的证券化议程,以及关于哪些商店可以继续营业的封锁规则背后的仇外言论影响力。临时停留以更新寻求庇护者的许可可视为敷衍了事的例外。我们表明,这些发展中的每一个都像往常一样对政治产生了很大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Corona Virus and Migration Governance in South Africa: Business As Usual?
The South African response in dealing with the Corona pandemic needs to speak to the realities of all people living in the country, including migrant and refugee communities. Reflecting on this in light of ongoing research on the political stakes of migration governance, we find that the virus response shows little change in the government agenda when it comes to dealing with refugees and other migrants. Veritably, we see that the pandemic may even be an excuse for pushing through already-aspired to policies. This includes the securitised agenda behind the sudden building of a border fence to close off Zimbabwe and the xenophobic-rhetorical clout behind the lockdown rules about which shops are allowed to remain open. The temporary stay on renewing asylum seekers permits counts as a perfunctory exception. We show that each of these developments very much play into politics as usual.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Africa Spectrum
Africa Spectrum AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Africa Spectrum is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal published since 1966 by the GIGA Institute of African Affairs (IAA) in Hamburg. It is a multidisciplinary journal dedicated to scientific exchange between the continents. It focuses on socially relevant issues related to political, economic, and sociocultural problems and events in Africa, as well as on Africa''s role within the international system. There are no article processing charges payable to publish in Africa Spectrum. For more than five decades, Africa Spectrum has provided in-depth analyses of current issues in political, social, and economic life; culture; and development in sub-Saharan Africa, including historical studies that illuminate current events on the continent. Africa Spectrum is the leading German academic journal exclusively devoted to this continent and is part of the GIGA Journal Family. The journal accepts Research Articles, Analyses and Reports as well as Book Reviews. It also publishes special issues devoted to particular subjects.
期刊最新文献
Nigerian Electoral Black Market: Where Do Party Switchers Go and Why Does It Matter? State Capacity and Elite Enrichment in Uganda's Northeastern Periphery Of Masks and Masculinities in Africa Masculinity, Morality, and the State in Northern Kenya: The Case of Baringo County's Il Chamus Afropolitan Masculinity: Forgeries of Wife-Owning Husbands in West Africa, 1850s–1950s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1