人工智能与艺术:识别区分人类和机器生成的艺术品的审美判断因素。

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1037/aca0000570
Andrew Samo, Scott Highhouse
{"title":"人工智能与艺术:识别区分人类和机器生成的艺术品的审美判断因素。","authors":"Andrew Samo, Scott Highhouse","doi":"10.1037/aca0000570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artistic creation hastraditionally been thought to be a uniquely human ability. Recent advancements in arti- fi cial intelligence (AI), however, have enabled algorithms to create art that is nearly indistinguishable from human artwork. Existing research suggests that people have a bias against AI artwork but cannot accurately identify it in blind comparisons. The current study extends this investigation to examine the aesthetic judg- ment factors differentiating human and machine art. Results indicate that people are unable to accurately identify artwork source but prefer human art and experience more positive emotions in response to human artwork. The aesthetic judgment factors differentiating human- and machine-generated art were all related to positive emotionality. This fi nding has several implications for this research area and limitation and avenues for future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47873,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence and art: Identifying the aesthetic judgment factors that distinguish human- and machine-generated artwork.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Samo, Scott Highhouse\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/aca0000570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Artistic creation hastraditionally been thought to be a uniquely human ability. Recent advancements in arti- fi cial intelligence (AI), however, have enabled algorithms to create art that is nearly indistinguishable from human artwork. Existing research suggests that people have a bias against AI artwork but cannot accurately identify it in blind comparisons. The current study extends this investigation to examine the aesthetic judg- ment factors differentiating human and machine art. Results indicate that people are unable to accurately identify artwork source but prefer human art and experience more positive emotions in response to human artwork. The aesthetic judgment factors differentiating human- and machine-generated art were all related to positive emotionality. This fi nding has several implications for this research area and limitation and avenues for future research are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000570\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000570","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

艺术创作历来被认为是人类独有的能力。然而,人工智能(AI)的最新进展使算法能够创造出与人类艺术品几乎无法区分的艺术。现有研究表明,人们对人工智能艺术品有偏见,但无法在盲目比较中准确识别。目前的研究扩展了这项调查,以检验区分人类艺术和机器艺术的审美判断因素。结果表明,人们无法准确识别艺术品来源,而是更喜欢人类艺术,并在对人类艺术的反应中体验到更积极的情绪。区分人和机器生成艺术的审美判断因素都与积极的情感有关。这一发现对该研究领域有几个影响,并讨论了未来研究的局限性和途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Artificial intelligence and art: Identifying the aesthetic judgment factors that distinguish human- and machine-generated artwork.
Artistic creation hastraditionally been thought to be a uniquely human ability. Recent advancements in arti- fi cial intelligence (AI), however, have enabled algorithms to create art that is nearly indistinguishable from human artwork. Existing research suggests that people have a bias against AI artwork but cannot accurately identify it in blind comparisons. The current study extends this investigation to examine the aesthetic judg- ment factors differentiating human and machine art. Results indicate that people are unable to accurately identify artwork source but prefer human art and experience more positive emotions in response to human artwork. The aesthetic judgment factors differentiating human- and machine-generated art were all related to positive emotionality. This fi nding has several implications for this research area and limitation and avenues for future research are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
135
期刊最新文献
Supplemental Material for The Role of Imagery and Emotion in the Aesthetic Appeal of Music, Poetry, and Paintings Supplemental Material for Were They Appealing to the Sun? On Why Cones and Tetrahedra Were So Popular at the Dawn of Civilization Visuospatial components of drawing skill correlate with mental transformation performance. The role of imagery and emotion in the aesthetic appeal of music, poetry, and paintings. Were they appealing to the sun? On why cones and tetrahedra were so popular at the dawn of civilization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1