某教学医院剖宫产先兆子痫/子痫患者麻醉技术的模式和效果

O. Fatungase, S. Olateju, E. Emmanuel, P. Adefuye, T. Shorunmu, R. Shoyemi, S. Dada, Y.O. Omoregie
{"title":"某教学医院剖宫产先兆子痫/子痫患者麻醉技术的模式和效果","authors":"O. Fatungase, S. Olateju, E. Emmanuel, P. Adefuye, T. Shorunmu, R. Shoyemi, S. Dada, Y.O. Omoregie","doi":"10.4314/rejhs.v11i2.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To review the pattern of anaesthesia techniques among pregnant women with pre-eclampsia or eclampsia who had caesarean section in our health facility and their management outcomeMethods: A retrospective analysis was undertaken for all the obstetric patients with pre-eclampsia or eclampsia who had caesarean sections under different types of anaesthesia in a tertiary hospital between January 1st 2014 and December 31st 2018.Results: A total of one hundred and eighty-two patients who presented with pre-eclampsia and eclampsia had emergency caesarean sections. Of these, 134 (74%) were diagnosed pre-eclampsia and 48 (26%) had eclampsia. The mean age was 29.71±6.40years. Subarachnoid block was performed in 165 (90.66 %), 15 (8.24 %) had general anaesthesia relaxant technique, and the remaining two (1.10 %) had local anaesthetic infiltration ± total intravenous anaesthesia. Peri-operative anaesthetic complications encountered included post-anaesthetic shivering 19 (10.44%), hypotension 16 (8.79 %) and nausea 1 (0.55 %). Incidence of death on table was six percent (11 patients). Among those that died, the anaesthesia technique was general anaesthesia in eight cases (73%) while three patients (27%) had subarachnoid blocks.Conclusion: Spinal anaesthesia was the most commonly used anaesthesia technique in this centre for patients with pre-eclampsia and conscious eclamptic patients, and it proved to be a relatively safe technique with few mortality.","PeriodicalId":29646,"journal":{"name":"Research Journal of Health Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pattern and outcome of Anaesthesia techniques in patients presenting with pre-eclampsia/eclampsia for caesarean section in a Teaching Hospital\",\"authors\":\"O. Fatungase, S. Olateju, E. Emmanuel, P. Adefuye, T. Shorunmu, R. Shoyemi, S. Dada, Y.O. Omoregie\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/rejhs.v11i2.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To review the pattern of anaesthesia techniques among pregnant women with pre-eclampsia or eclampsia who had caesarean section in our health facility and their management outcomeMethods: A retrospective analysis was undertaken for all the obstetric patients with pre-eclampsia or eclampsia who had caesarean sections under different types of anaesthesia in a tertiary hospital between January 1st 2014 and December 31st 2018.Results: A total of one hundred and eighty-two patients who presented with pre-eclampsia and eclampsia had emergency caesarean sections. Of these, 134 (74%) were diagnosed pre-eclampsia and 48 (26%) had eclampsia. The mean age was 29.71±6.40years. Subarachnoid block was performed in 165 (90.66 %), 15 (8.24 %) had general anaesthesia relaxant technique, and the remaining two (1.10 %) had local anaesthetic infiltration ± total intravenous anaesthesia. Peri-operative anaesthetic complications encountered included post-anaesthetic shivering 19 (10.44%), hypotension 16 (8.79 %) and nausea 1 (0.55 %). Incidence of death on table was six percent (11 patients). Among those that died, the anaesthesia technique was general anaesthesia in eight cases (73%) while three patients (27%) had subarachnoid blocks.Conclusion: Spinal anaesthesia was the most commonly used anaesthesia technique in this centre for patients with pre-eclampsia and conscious eclamptic patients, and it proved to be a relatively safe technique with few mortality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Journal of Health Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Journal of Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/rejhs.v11i2.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/rejhs.v11i2.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:回顾我院剖宫产先兆子痫或子痫孕妇的麻醉技术模式及其管理结果2014年1月1日和2018年12月31日。结果:共有182名先兆子痫和子痫患者进行了紧急剖腹产。其中,134人(74%)被诊断为先兆子痫,48人(26%)患有子痫。平均年龄29.71±6.40岁。165例(90.66%)行蛛网膜下腔阻滞,15例(8.24%)采用全身麻醉松弛剂技术,其余2例(1.10%)采用局部麻醉浸润±全静脉麻醉。围术期麻醉并发症包括麻醉后颤抖19例(10.44%)、低血压16例(8.79%)和恶心1例(0.55%)。餐桌上的死亡发生率为6%(11名患者)。在死亡患者中,8例(73%)采用全身麻醉,3例(27%)采用蛛网膜下腔阻滞。结论:脊髓麻醉是该中心先兆子痫患者和意识子痫患者最常用的麻醉技术,它被证明是一种相对安全、死亡率低的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pattern and outcome of Anaesthesia techniques in patients presenting with pre-eclampsia/eclampsia for caesarean section in a Teaching Hospital
Objectives: To review the pattern of anaesthesia techniques among pregnant women with pre-eclampsia or eclampsia who had caesarean section in our health facility and their management outcomeMethods: A retrospective analysis was undertaken for all the obstetric patients with pre-eclampsia or eclampsia who had caesarean sections under different types of anaesthesia in a tertiary hospital between January 1st 2014 and December 31st 2018.Results: A total of one hundred and eighty-two patients who presented with pre-eclampsia and eclampsia had emergency caesarean sections. Of these, 134 (74%) were diagnosed pre-eclampsia and 48 (26%) had eclampsia. The mean age was 29.71±6.40years. Subarachnoid block was performed in 165 (90.66 %), 15 (8.24 %) had general anaesthesia relaxant technique, and the remaining two (1.10 %) had local anaesthetic infiltration ± total intravenous anaesthesia. Peri-operative anaesthetic complications encountered included post-anaesthetic shivering 19 (10.44%), hypotension 16 (8.79 %) and nausea 1 (0.55 %). Incidence of death on table was six percent (11 patients). Among those that died, the anaesthesia technique was general anaesthesia in eight cases (73%) while three patients (27%) had subarachnoid blocks.Conclusion: Spinal anaesthesia was the most commonly used anaesthesia technique in this centre for patients with pre-eclampsia and conscious eclamptic patients, and it proved to be a relatively safe technique with few mortality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Antibiotic prophylaxis in obstetric and gynaecological procedures: Acomparative study between two regimens of antibiotics A retrospective assessment of rifampicin resistance in paediatric tuberculosis in a tertiary hospital in south west Nigeria Obesity and hypoglycaemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus outpatients on insulin therapy in Nigeria–data from the multicentre evaluation of type 2 diabetes mellitus outpatients patients on insulin therapy (METOIN) study Exploring atypical manifestations of Mpox: Anarrative review Correlation between Hearing Thresholds and Habitual use of Headphones/Earphones among Students of Tertiary Institutions in Northwestern Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1