政客Instagram上讽刺检测的情绪分析

Aisyah Muhaddisi
{"title":"政客Instagram上讽刺检测的情绪分析","authors":"Aisyah Muhaddisi","doi":"10.22146/IJCCS.66375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sarcasm is one of the problem that affect the result of sentiment analysis. According to Maynard and Greenwood (2014), performance of sentiment analysis can be improved when sarcasm also identified. Some research used Naïve Bayes and Random Forest method on sentiment analysis process. On Salles, dkk (2018) research, in some cases Random Forest outperform the performance by Support Vector Machine that known as a superior method. In this research, we did sentiment analysis on comment section on Instagram account of Indonesian politician. This research compare the accuracy of  sentiment analysis with sarcasm detection and analysis sentiment without sarcasm detection, sentiment analysis with Naïve Bayes and Random Forest method  then Random Forest for sarcasm detection. This research resulted in accuracy value in sentiment analysis without sarcasm detection with Naïve Bayes 61%, with Random Forest method 72%. Accuracy on sentiment analysis with sarcasm detection using Naïve Bayes – Random Forest method is 60% and using Random Forest – Random Forest method is 71%.","PeriodicalId":31625,"journal":{"name":"IJCCS Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sentiment Analysis With Sarcasm Detection On Politician’s Instagram\",\"authors\":\"Aisyah Muhaddisi\",\"doi\":\"10.22146/IJCCS.66375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sarcasm is one of the problem that affect the result of sentiment analysis. According to Maynard and Greenwood (2014), performance of sentiment analysis can be improved when sarcasm also identified. Some research used Naïve Bayes and Random Forest method on sentiment analysis process. On Salles, dkk (2018) research, in some cases Random Forest outperform the performance by Support Vector Machine that known as a superior method. In this research, we did sentiment analysis on comment section on Instagram account of Indonesian politician. This research compare the accuracy of  sentiment analysis with sarcasm detection and analysis sentiment without sarcasm detection, sentiment analysis with Naïve Bayes and Random Forest method  then Random Forest for sarcasm detection. This research resulted in accuracy value in sentiment analysis without sarcasm detection with Naïve Bayes 61%, with Random Forest method 72%. Accuracy on sentiment analysis with sarcasm detection using Naïve Bayes – Random Forest method is 60% and using Random Forest – Random Forest method is 71%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJCCS Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJCCS Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22146/IJCCS.66375\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJCCS Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/IJCCS.66375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

讽刺是影响情感分析结果的问题之一。根据Maynard和Greenwood(2014),当讽刺也被识别时,情绪分析的表现可以得到改善。一些研究使用Naïve贝叶斯和随机森林方法进行情感分析过程。在Salles, dkk(2018)的研究中,在某些情况下,随机森林的性能优于被称为优越方法的支持向量机。在这项研究中,我们对印度尼西亚政治家的Instagram账户的评论区进行了情感分析。本研究比较了带讽刺检测的情感分析和不带讽刺检测的情感分析、带Naïve贝叶斯和随机森林方法的情感分析以及随机森林进行讽刺检测的准确性。本研究结果表明,在没有讽刺检测的情况下,情感分析的准确率值为Naïve,贝叶斯方法为61%,随机森林方法为72%。使用Naïve贝叶斯-随机森林方法进行讽刺检测的情感分析的准确率为60%,使用随机森林-随机森林方法的准确率为71%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sentiment Analysis With Sarcasm Detection On Politician’s Instagram
Sarcasm is one of the problem that affect the result of sentiment analysis. According to Maynard and Greenwood (2014), performance of sentiment analysis can be improved when sarcasm also identified. Some research used Naïve Bayes and Random Forest method on sentiment analysis process. On Salles, dkk (2018) research, in some cases Random Forest outperform the performance by Support Vector Machine that known as a superior method. In this research, we did sentiment analysis on comment section on Instagram account of Indonesian politician. This research compare the accuracy of  sentiment analysis with sarcasm detection and analysis sentiment without sarcasm detection, sentiment analysis with Naïve Bayes and Random Forest method  then Random Forest for sarcasm detection. This research resulted in accuracy value in sentiment analysis without sarcasm detection with Naïve Bayes 61%, with Random Forest method 72%. Accuracy on sentiment analysis with sarcasm detection using Naïve Bayes – Random Forest method is 60% and using Random Forest – Random Forest method is 71%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Identify Reviews of Pedulilindungi Applications using Topic Modeling with Latent Dirichlet Allocation Method Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory (C-LSTM) For Multi Product Prediction Optimizing ODP Device Placement on FTTH Network Using Genetic Algorithms Backward Elimination for Feature Selection on Breast Cancer Classification Using Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machine Algorithms ESSAY ANSWER CLASSIFICATION WITH SMOTE RANDOM FOREST AND ADABOOST IN AUTOMATED ESSAY SCORING
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1