为什么不取消布鲁塞尔的分级水价?

IF 0.1 Q4 URBAN STUDIES Brussels Studies Pub Date : 2021-05-09 DOI:10.4000/BRUSSELS.5519
Xavier May, Pauline Bacquaert, J. Decroly, Léa de Guiran, Chloé Deligne, Pierre Lannoy, Valentina Marziali
{"title":"为什么不取消布鲁塞尔的分级水价?","authors":"Xavier May, Pauline Bacquaert, J. Decroly, Léa de Guiran, Chloé Deligne, Pierre Lannoy, Valentina Marziali","doi":"10.4000/BRUSSELS.5519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2005, the Brussels-Capital Region switched from linear pricing to progressive pricing per person because the latter was supposed to be social and ecological. We show that poor households do not consume less water per person than rich households in Belgium and Brussels. Tiered pricing therefore does not benefit poor households and is not social. We also point out that there is no evidence that progressive pricing has encouraged Brussels residents to reduce their already low water consumption. It would therefore not be environmentally friendly either. On the other hand, progressive pricing has a number of disadvantages and leads to serious problems of equity. We therefore advocate a return to linear water pricing for all in Brussels.","PeriodicalId":53901,"journal":{"name":"Brussels Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why not do away with tiered water pricing in Brussels?\",\"authors\":\"Xavier May, Pauline Bacquaert, J. Decroly, Léa de Guiran, Chloé Deligne, Pierre Lannoy, Valentina Marziali\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/BRUSSELS.5519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2005, the Brussels-Capital Region switched from linear pricing to progressive pricing per person because the latter was supposed to be social and ecological. We show that poor households do not consume less water per person than rich households in Belgium and Brussels. Tiered pricing therefore does not benefit poor households and is not social. We also point out that there is no evidence that progressive pricing has encouraged Brussels residents to reduce their already low water consumption. It would therefore not be environmentally friendly either. On the other hand, progressive pricing has a number of disadvantages and leads to serious problems of equity. We therefore advocate a return to linear water pricing for all in Brussels.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brussels Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brussels Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/BRUSSELS.5519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brussels Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/BRUSSELS.5519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2005年,布鲁塞尔首都大区从线性定价改为累进定价,因为后者应该是社会和生态的。我们表明,在比利时和布鲁塞尔,贫困家庭的人均用水量并不比富裕家庭少。因此,分层定价对贫困家庭没有好处,也不具有社会性。我们还指出,没有证据表明渐进式定价鼓励布鲁塞尔居民减少他们已经很低的用水量。因此,它也不是环境友好型的。另一方面,累进定价有许多缺点,并导致严重的公平问题。因此,我们主张恢复布鲁塞尔所有人的线性水价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why not do away with tiered water pricing in Brussels?
In 2005, the Brussels-Capital Region switched from linear pricing to progressive pricing per person because the latter was supposed to be social and ecological. We show that poor households do not consume less water per person than rich households in Belgium and Brussels. Tiered pricing therefore does not benefit poor households and is not social. We also point out that there is no evidence that progressive pricing has encouraged Brussels residents to reduce their already low water consumption. It would therefore not be environmentally friendly either. On the other hand, progressive pricing has a number of disadvantages and leads to serious problems of equity. We therefore advocate a return to linear water pricing for all in Brussels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brussels Studies
Brussels Studies URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
66.70%
发文量
31
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
Entre habitabilité et accessibilité au Bois de la Cambre Between liveability and accessibility in the Bois de la Cambre Het Ter Kamerenbos: tussen leefbaarheid en bereikbaarheid Openbare toiletten in de Brusselse openbare ruimten: noodzaak of overlast? Les toilettes publiques dans les espaces publics bruxellois : nécessité ou nuisance ?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1