相互承认的原则:从内部市场到欧洲自由、安全和正义领域

A. Groza
{"title":"相互承认的原则:从内部市场到欧洲自由、安全和正义领域","authors":"A. Groza","doi":"10.24818/tbj/2022/12/1.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The principle of mutual recognition represents one of the brilliant creations of the\nCourt of Justice of the European Union, which has significantly contributed to the\nachievement of the free movement of goods, in the absence of the approximation of national\nlaws, and which is impressive even today by its depth and vocation to extend to new fields of\nEuropean integration. Mutual recognition is one of the efficient solutions in order to have\nunity in diversity and also common objectives to reach. We find the principle of mutual\nrecognition in the sphere of the fundamental freedoms of the internal market and in very\ndifferent domains of the internal market too. Judicial cooperation in civil and criminal\nmatters uses this principle in order to ensure the free movement of judgements and the\neffectiveness of criminal proceedings. The application of the principle in very different fields\nhas illustrated its utility, as well as the particularities of each area. By observing these\nparticularities, we can better understand the European integration specificity in various\nfields and its challenges. Our research is descriptive, explanatory and comparative, being\naccompanied by the relevant case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.","PeriodicalId":41903,"journal":{"name":"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The principle of mutual recognition: from the internal market\\nto the European area of freedom, security and justice\",\"authors\":\"A. Groza\",\"doi\":\"10.24818/tbj/2022/12/1.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The principle of mutual recognition represents one of the brilliant creations of the\\nCourt of Justice of the European Union, which has significantly contributed to the\\nachievement of the free movement of goods, in the absence of the approximation of national\\nlaws, and which is impressive even today by its depth and vocation to extend to new fields of\\nEuropean integration. Mutual recognition is one of the efficient solutions in order to have\\nunity in diversity and also common objectives to reach. We find the principle of mutual\\nrecognition in the sphere of the fundamental freedoms of the internal market and in very\\ndifferent domains of the internal market too. Judicial cooperation in civil and criminal\\nmatters uses this principle in order to ensure the free movement of judgements and the\\neffectiveness of criminal proceedings. The application of the principle in very different fields\\nhas illustrated its utility, as well as the particularities of each area. By observing these\\nparticularities, we can better understand the European integration specificity in various\\nfields and its challenges. Our research is descriptive, explanatory and comparative, being\\naccompanied by the relevant case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24818/tbj/2022/12/1.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/tbj/2022/12/1.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

相互承认原则是欧盟法院的杰出创造之一,在缺乏近似国家法律的情况下,它为实现货物的自由流动作出了重大贡献,即使在今天,它的深度和使命也令人印象深刻,延伸到欧洲一体化的新领域。相互承认是求同存异、实现共同目标的有效途径之一。我们在内部市场的基本自由领域以及在内部市场的非常不同的领域都发现了相互承认的原则。民事和刑事案件的司法合作利用这一原则,以确保判决的自由流动和刑事诉讼的有效性。这一原则在不同领域的应用说明了它的实用性,以及每个领域的特殊性。通过观察这些特殊性,我们可以更好地理解欧洲一体化在各个领域的特殊性及其面临的挑战。我们的研究是描述性、解释性和比较性的,并伴随着欧盟法院的相关判例法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The principle of mutual recognition: from the internal market to the European area of freedom, security and justice
The principle of mutual recognition represents one of the brilliant creations of the Court of Justice of the European Union, which has significantly contributed to the achievement of the free movement of goods, in the absence of the approximation of national laws, and which is impressive even today by its depth and vocation to extend to new fields of European integration. Mutual recognition is one of the efficient solutions in order to have unity in diversity and also common objectives to reach. We find the principle of mutual recognition in the sphere of the fundamental freedoms of the internal market and in very different domains of the internal market too. Judicial cooperation in civil and criminal matters uses this principle in order to ensure the free movement of judgements and the effectiveness of criminal proceedings. The application of the principle in very different fields has illustrated its utility, as well as the particularities of each area. By observing these particularities, we can better understand the European integration specificity in various fields and its challenges. Our research is descriptive, explanatory and comparative, being accompanied by the relevant case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Compensation for non-material damage caused to legal entities in the decision-making practice of the CJEU and the ECHR Problems of legal regulation of artificial intelligence in administrative judicial procedure Preventing computer crime by knowing the legal regulations that ensure the protection of computer systems A regulatory analysis of digital financial services and the adoption of central bank digital currencies in Zimbabwe and South Africa Forum shopping in regulatory sandboxes and the perils of experimental law-making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1