欧洲议会的政治空间:在欧洲怀疑主义抬头的背景下衡量欧洲议会议员的偏好

IF 3.6 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE European Journal of Political Research Pub Date : 2023-03-07 DOI:10.1111/1475-6765.12587
SIMON HIX, RICHARD WHITAKER, GALINA ZAPRYANOVA
{"title":"欧洲议会的政治空间:在欧洲怀疑主义抬头的背景下衡量欧洲议会议员的偏好","authors":"SIMON HIX,&nbsp;RICHARD WHITAKER,&nbsp;GALINA ZAPRYANOVA","doi":"10.1111/1475-6765.12587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The 2014–2019 European Parliament (EP) contained an unprecedented number of Eurosceptic Members of the European Parliament (MEPs). These changes reflected a growing politicisation of European integration in which conflicts between those opposing the process and those favouring it became more pronounced. Using a unique time series of surveys of the European parliamentarians, we examine how far the policy preferences of the MEPs responded to this politicisation. MEPs' preferences over general policy questions as well as European Union (EU)-specific issues have traditionally been described by a multi-dimensional space: with a left-right dimension, incorporating both economic and socio-cultural issues, distinct from a pro-/anti-Europe dimension. We find that the political space in the EP evolved in the 2014–2019 parliament, with MEPs' preferences more strongly aligned along a single dimension, which captures economic, socio-cultural, and EU integration issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":48273,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Political Research","volume":"63 1","pages":"153-171"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-6765.12587","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The political space in the European parliament: Measuring MEPs' preferences amid the rise of Euroscepticism\",\"authors\":\"SIMON HIX,&nbsp;RICHARD WHITAKER,&nbsp;GALINA ZAPRYANOVA\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1475-6765.12587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The 2014–2019 European Parliament (EP) contained an unprecedented number of Eurosceptic Members of the European Parliament (MEPs). These changes reflected a growing politicisation of European integration in which conflicts between those opposing the process and those favouring it became more pronounced. Using a unique time series of surveys of the European parliamentarians, we examine how far the policy preferences of the MEPs responded to this politicisation. MEPs' preferences over general policy questions as well as European Union (EU)-specific issues have traditionally been described by a multi-dimensional space: with a left-right dimension, incorporating both economic and socio-cultural issues, distinct from a pro-/anti-Europe dimension. We find that the political space in the EP evolved in the 2014–2019 parliament, with MEPs' preferences more strongly aligned along a single dimension, which captures economic, socio-cultural, and EU integration issues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Political Research\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"153-171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-6765.12587\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Political Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6765.12587\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Political Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6765.12587","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2014-2019 年的欧洲议会(EP)中,持欧洲怀疑论的欧洲议会议员(MEPs)人数之多前所未有。这些变化反映出欧洲一体化日益政治化,反对欧洲一体化进程的人与支持欧洲一体化进程的人之间的冲突更加明显。我们利用对欧洲议会议员的独特时间序列调查,研究了欧洲议会议员的政策偏好在多大程度上响应了这种政治化。欧洲议会议员对一般政策问题以及欧盟(EU)具体问题的偏好历来被描述为一个多维空间:左右维度,包含经济和社会文化问题,有别于亲欧/反欧维度。我们发现,在 2014-2019 年议会中,欧洲议会的政治空间发生了变化,欧洲议会议员的偏好在单一维度上更加一致,该维度涵盖了经济、社会文化和欧盟一体化问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The political space in the European parliament: Measuring MEPs' preferences amid the rise of Euroscepticism

The 2014–2019 European Parliament (EP) contained an unprecedented number of Eurosceptic Members of the European Parliament (MEPs). These changes reflected a growing politicisation of European integration in which conflicts between those opposing the process and those favouring it became more pronounced. Using a unique time series of surveys of the European parliamentarians, we examine how far the policy preferences of the MEPs responded to this politicisation. MEPs' preferences over general policy questions as well as European Union (EU)-specific issues have traditionally been described by a multi-dimensional space: with a left-right dimension, incorporating both economic and socio-cultural issues, distinct from a pro-/anti-Europe dimension. We find that the political space in the EP evolved in the 2014–2019 parliament, with MEPs' preferences more strongly aligned along a single dimension, which captures economic, socio-cultural, and EU integration issues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: European Journal of Political Research specialises in articles articulating theoretical and comparative perspectives in political science, and welcomes both quantitative and qualitative approaches. EJPR also publishes short research notes outlining ongoing research in more specific areas of research. The Journal includes the Political Data Yearbook, published as a double issue at the end of each volume.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Correction to (When) do electoral mandates set the agenda? Government capacity and mandate responsiveness in Germany Issue Information Patterns of democracy and democratic satisfaction: Results from a comparative conjoint experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1