艾伦·J·格林汉姆著的《Engulfment:H.P.洛夫克拉夫特、菲利普·K·迪克、罗伯特·A·海因莱因和弗兰克·赫伯特的宇宙主义和新宇宙主义》(综述)

IF 0.2 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE SCIENCE-FICTION STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-06-23 DOI:10.1353/sfs.2023.a900286
E. Spencer
{"title":"艾伦·J·格林汉姆著的《Engulfment:H.P.洛夫克拉夫特、菲利普·K·迪克、罗伯特·A·海因莱因和弗兰克·赫伯特的宇宙主义和新宇宙主义》(综述)","authors":"E. Spencer","doi":"10.1353/sfs.2023.a900286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ASF’s perspective. Second, Odumboni’s article is USA-centric. He appears to locate the “European incursion” (59) in Africa in 1619, a date commonly used to designate the possible start of slavery in the USA. Yet the Portuguese had entered the African slave trade over a century earlier. USA-centrism also inflects his argument when he writes that “the geographical rootedness of Black Panther aligns it with Okorafor’s conceptualization of Africanfuturism” (65). While Okorafor emphasizes the importance of Africa as a setting for Africanfuturism, Black Panther is her main example of what is not Africanbut rather Afrofuturism. Of course, one is free to redefine Africanfuturism to include Black Panther. Yet bending Okorafor’s concept without engaging the arguments does a disservice to ASF authors’ attempts to be considered on African terms as peoples with a distinct history, lived experience, and literature and film. Third, Osuji’s attempt to read Achebe’s work as speculative fiction is potentially provocative because some have understood ASF as a challenge to Achebe’s realism, which to their understandable dissatisfaction continues to set the “standard for contemporary African writing” (16). If Achebe’s work were shown to be speculative, it would necessitate a revision of ASF’s status in the African literary canon and of African realism as such. An obvious way of doing so is to see Things Fall Apart as an “‘alien’ invasion” novel, as Rodriques does in her essay (30). Osuji, however, follows the template of MR articles (which Ezeiyoke criticizes), but now understands the supernatural not as magical but as speculative. This makes the two synonymous and raises the question of what we gain by calling works ASF at all. Nevertheless, even these weak points are important because they highlight what questions must be asked, including the question of what we gain by rereading certain works as speculative fiction. It makes ALT 39 a beneficial intervention and informative reading for those who are new to ASF and for those who have been engaged in these debates for longer.—Peter J. Maurits, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany","PeriodicalId":45553,"journal":{"name":"SCIENCE-FICTION STUDIES","volume":"50 1","pages":"279 - 283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"After Engulfment: Cosmicism and Neocosmicism in H.P. Lovecraft, Philip K. Dick, Robert A. Heinlein, and Frank Herbert by Ellen J. Greenham (review)\",\"authors\":\"E. Spencer\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/sfs.2023.a900286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ASF’s perspective. Second, Odumboni’s article is USA-centric. He appears to locate the “European incursion” (59) in Africa in 1619, a date commonly used to designate the possible start of slavery in the USA. Yet the Portuguese had entered the African slave trade over a century earlier. USA-centrism also inflects his argument when he writes that “the geographical rootedness of Black Panther aligns it with Okorafor’s conceptualization of Africanfuturism” (65). While Okorafor emphasizes the importance of Africa as a setting for Africanfuturism, Black Panther is her main example of what is not Africanbut rather Afrofuturism. Of course, one is free to redefine Africanfuturism to include Black Panther. Yet bending Okorafor’s concept without engaging the arguments does a disservice to ASF authors’ attempts to be considered on African terms as peoples with a distinct history, lived experience, and literature and film. Third, Osuji’s attempt to read Achebe’s work as speculative fiction is potentially provocative because some have understood ASF as a challenge to Achebe’s realism, which to their understandable dissatisfaction continues to set the “standard for contemporary African writing” (16). If Achebe’s work were shown to be speculative, it would necessitate a revision of ASF’s status in the African literary canon and of African realism as such. An obvious way of doing so is to see Things Fall Apart as an “‘alien’ invasion” novel, as Rodriques does in her essay (30). Osuji, however, follows the template of MR articles (which Ezeiyoke criticizes), but now understands the supernatural not as magical but as speculative. This makes the two synonymous and raises the question of what we gain by calling works ASF at all. Nevertheless, even these weak points are important because they highlight what questions must be asked, including the question of what we gain by rereading certain works as speculative fiction. It makes ALT 39 a beneficial intervention and informative reading for those who are new to ASF and for those who have been engaged in these debates for longer.—Peter J. Maurits, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany\",\"PeriodicalId\":45553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SCIENCE-FICTION STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"279 - 283\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SCIENCE-FICTION STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/sfs.2023.a900286\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCIENCE-FICTION STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sfs.2023.a900286","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ASF的观点。其次,奥顿博尼的文章是以美国为中心的。他似乎将1619年“欧洲入侵”(59)定在了非洲,这一日期通常用来表示美国可能开始奴隶制。然而,葡萄牙人早在一个多世纪前就进入了非洲奴隶贸易。美国中心主义也影响了他的论点,他写道“《黑豹》的地理根源使其与奥科拉福对非洲未来主义的概念相一致”(65)。虽然Okorafor强调非洲作为非洲未来主义背景的重要性,但《黑豹》是她不是非洲而是非洲未来论的主要例子。当然,人们可以自由地重新定义非洲未来主义,将《黑豹》也包括在内。然而,在不参与争论的情况下弯曲Okorafor的概念,有损于ASF作者试图在非洲被视为具有独特历史、生活经历、文学和电影的民族。第三,奥苏吉试图将阿切贝的作品解读为思辨小说,这可能具有挑衅性,因为一些人认为ASF是对阿切贝现实主义的挑战,而他们可以理解的是,现实主义继续为“当代非洲写作树立标准”(16)。如果阿切贝的作品被证明是推测性的,那么就需要修改ASF在非洲文学经典中的地位,以及非洲现实主义的地位。这样做的一个明显方式是将《分崩离析》视为一部“连累式”入侵小说,正如罗德里克斯在她的文章(30)中所做的那样。然而,Osuji遵循了MR文章的模板(Ezeiyook对此进行了批评),但现在理解超自然现象并不像魔法那样神奇,而是推测性的。这使两者成为同义词,并提出了一个问题,即我们通过将作品称为ASF到底能获得什么。尽管如此,即使是这些弱点也很重要,因为它们突出了必须提出的问题,包括我们通过将某些作品作为推理小说重读来获得什么的问题。它使ALT 39成为那些新接触ASF的人和那些参与这些辩论时间更长的人的有益干预和信息阅读--Peter J.Maurits,德国埃尔兰根-纽伦堡大学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
After Engulfment: Cosmicism and Neocosmicism in H.P. Lovecraft, Philip K. Dick, Robert A. Heinlein, and Frank Herbert by Ellen J. Greenham (review)
ASF’s perspective. Second, Odumboni’s article is USA-centric. He appears to locate the “European incursion” (59) in Africa in 1619, a date commonly used to designate the possible start of slavery in the USA. Yet the Portuguese had entered the African slave trade over a century earlier. USA-centrism also inflects his argument when he writes that “the geographical rootedness of Black Panther aligns it with Okorafor’s conceptualization of Africanfuturism” (65). While Okorafor emphasizes the importance of Africa as a setting for Africanfuturism, Black Panther is her main example of what is not Africanbut rather Afrofuturism. Of course, one is free to redefine Africanfuturism to include Black Panther. Yet bending Okorafor’s concept without engaging the arguments does a disservice to ASF authors’ attempts to be considered on African terms as peoples with a distinct history, lived experience, and literature and film. Third, Osuji’s attempt to read Achebe’s work as speculative fiction is potentially provocative because some have understood ASF as a challenge to Achebe’s realism, which to their understandable dissatisfaction continues to set the “standard for contemporary African writing” (16). If Achebe’s work were shown to be speculative, it would necessitate a revision of ASF’s status in the African literary canon and of African realism as such. An obvious way of doing so is to see Things Fall Apart as an “‘alien’ invasion” novel, as Rodriques does in her essay (30). Osuji, however, follows the template of MR articles (which Ezeiyoke criticizes), but now understands the supernatural not as magical but as speculative. This makes the two synonymous and raises the question of what we gain by calling works ASF at all. Nevertheless, even these weak points are important because they highlight what questions must be asked, including the question of what we gain by rereading certain works as speculative fiction. It makes ALT 39 a beneficial intervention and informative reading for those who are new to ASF and for those who have been engaged in these debates for longer.—Peter J. Maurits, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
期刊最新文献
Towards Postcapitalist Value in Kim Stanley Robinson’s The Ministry for the Future Black Possibility: A Metaphysical Space of Power and Wild Imagination Anne Leckie’s Ancillary Justice: A Critical Companion by David M. Higgins (review) Notes on Contributors A New Geological (R)age: Orogeny, Anger, and the Anthropocene in N.K. Jemisin’s The Fifth Season
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1