中国跨境经济一体化:从缅甸进口牛的正规化

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 Q3 AREA STUDIES China-An International Journal Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.1353/chn.2022.0018
S. Waldron, Zhizhi Si, Theingi Myint, Dominic Smith
{"title":"中国跨境经济一体化:从缅甸进口牛的正规化","authors":"S. Waldron, Zhizhi Si, Theingi Myint, Dominic Smith","doi":"10.1353/chn.2022.0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:China has sought agricultural integration with neighbouring countries to access resources, promote economic development and border stability, and to manage problems of food safety, biosecurity and smuggling. Based on fieldwork and primary data from both sides of the border, this article examines the way that these forces play out in the case of the Myanmar–China cattle trade. Both countries have embarked on the formidable task of diverting a large flow of smuggled cattle into formal channels where cattle are inspected for diseases and taxes levied. While these measures were facilitated by high-level policy support and about US$1 billion in government and corporate investment, they have not been successful in formalising and expanding the trade. This is primarily because the Myanmar government was concerned with resource depletion and because smuggling is more profitable for value chain actors. As such, these concerns should be incorporated into future revised trade programmes. This article enhances our understanding of China’s cross-border integration programme and provides new empirical data for researchers of trade policy, transboundary disease management and agricultural development.","PeriodicalId":45391,"journal":{"name":"China-An International Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"101 - 133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"China’s Cross-border Economic Integration: Formalising Cattle Imports from Myanmar\",\"authors\":\"S. Waldron, Zhizhi Si, Theingi Myint, Dominic Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/chn.2022.0018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:China has sought agricultural integration with neighbouring countries to access resources, promote economic development and border stability, and to manage problems of food safety, biosecurity and smuggling. Based on fieldwork and primary data from both sides of the border, this article examines the way that these forces play out in the case of the Myanmar–China cattle trade. Both countries have embarked on the formidable task of diverting a large flow of smuggled cattle into formal channels where cattle are inspected for diseases and taxes levied. While these measures were facilitated by high-level policy support and about US$1 billion in government and corporate investment, they have not been successful in formalising and expanding the trade. This is primarily because the Myanmar government was concerned with resource depletion and because smuggling is more profitable for value chain actors. As such, these concerns should be incorporated into future revised trade programmes. This article enhances our understanding of China’s cross-border integration programme and provides new empirical data for researchers of trade policy, transboundary disease management and agricultural development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"China-An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"101 - 133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"China-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/chn.2022.0018\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/chn.2022.0018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:中国寻求与邻国的农业一体化,以获取资源,促进经济发展和边境稳定,并解决食品安全、生物安全和走私问题。基于实地调查和边境两侧的原始数据,本文考察了这些力量在缅甸-中国牛贸易中的表现方式。两国都开始了艰巨的任务,将大量走私牛转移到正规渠道,在那里对牛进行疾病检查和征税。尽管这些措施得到了高层政策支持和约10亿美元的政府和企业投资的推动,但它们并没有成功地使贸易正式化和扩大。这主要是因为缅甸政府担心资源枯竭,也因为走私对价值链参与者来说更有利可图。因此,这些关切应当纳入今后修订的贸易方案。这篇文章增进了我们对中国跨境一体化计划的理解,并为贸易政策、跨境疾病管理和农业发展的研究人员提供了新的经验数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
China’s Cross-border Economic Integration: Formalising Cattle Imports from Myanmar
Abstract:China has sought agricultural integration with neighbouring countries to access resources, promote economic development and border stability, and to manage problems of food safety, biosecurity and smuggling. Based on fieldwork and primary data from both sides of the border, this article examines the way that these forces play out in the case of the Myanmar–China cattle trade. Both countries have embarked on the formidable task of diverting a large flow of smuggled cattle into formal channels where cattle are inspected for diseases and taxes levied. While these measures were facilitated by high-level policy support and about US$1 billion in government and corporate investment, they have not been successful in formalising and expanding the trade. This is primarily because the Myanmar government was concerned with resource depletion and because smuggling is more profitable for value chain actors. As such, these concerns should be incorporated into future revised trade programmes. This article enhances our understanding of China’s cross-border integration programme and provides new empirical data for researchers of trade policy, transboundary disease management and agricultural development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
How the "Rise of Great Power" Restrains Bilateral Trade Flows: Evidence from China and its Trading Partners Layering Ideologies from Deng Xiaoping to Xi Jinping: Tracing Ideological Changes of the Communist Party of China Using Text Analysis China–Asean Relations January 2023 To March 2023: Important Documents When Top-down Meets Bottom-up: Understanding the Logic and Dynamics of Responsive Authoritarianism, based on Central Environmental Inspection in China Afterword and Reflections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1