印尼事实核查组织发展的多案例分析

Detta Rahmawan, Rudi Hartanto, Irma Garnesia
{"title":"印尼事实核查组织发展的多案例分析","authors":"Detta Rahmawan, Rudi Hartanto, Irma Garnesia","doi":"10.24198/jkk.v10i1.38752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The network of fact-checking organizations has expanded widely, and these organizations are seen as one of the important elements in the efforts to tackle the spread of disinformation, misinformation, or hoax in the society. Although the number of fact-checking organizations in all parts of the world continue to increase, scholarly studies which tries to capture the presence of fact-checking practices in Global South Countries, including Indonesia are still limited. This study uses a multi-case study method to analyze the development of fact-checking practices carried out by six organizations in Indonesia which already certified by the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) namely: Liputan6, Suara.com, Tirto.id, Kompas.com, Tempo.co, and MAFINDO. Since fact-checking initiatives became popular about six years ago in Indonesia, we discovered that Indonesian fact-checking organizations have grown and strengthened their presence nationally, as well as engaged with various networks of global organizations that leading the ongoing fight against hoax. However, Indonesian fact-checking organizations are still facing several challenges in the context of standardizing fact-checking methodologies, measuring and evaluating the “impact” of their fact-checking activities and related to the management of fact-checking resources. While this study attempts to contribute an overview of Indonesian fact-checking organizations, further studies on fact-checking initiatives with various methodological approaches are still needed to comprehensively look at the role of fact-checking organizations in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":31891,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi Case Analysis on The Development of Fact-Checking Organizations in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Detta Rahmawan, Rudi Hartanto, Irma Garnesia\",\"doi\":\"10.24198/jkk.v10i1.38752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The network of fact-checking organizations has expanded widely, and these organizations are seen as one of the important elements in the efforts to tackle the spread of disinformation, misinformation, or hoax in the society. Although the number of fact-checking organizations in all parts of the world continue to increase, scholarly studies which tries to capture the presence of fact-checking practices in Global South Countries, including Indonesia are still limited. This study uses a multi-case study method to analyze the development of fact-checking practices carried out by six organizations in Indonesia which already certified by the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) namely: Liputan6, Suara.com, Tirto.id, Kompas.com, Tempo.co, and MAFINDO. Since fact-checking initiatives became popular about six years ago in Indonesia, we discovered that Indonesian fact-checking organizations have grown and strengthened their presence nationally, as well as engaged with various networks of global organizations that leading the ongoing fight against hoax. However, Indonesian fact-checking organizations are still facing several challenges in the context of standardizing fact-checking methodologies, measuring and evaluating the “impact” of their fact-checking activities and related to the management of fact-checking resources. While this study attempts to contribute an overview of Indonesian fact-checking organizations, further studies on fact-checking initiatives with various methodological approaches are still needed to comprehensively look at the role of fact-checking organizations in Indonesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.v10i1.38752\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.v10i1.38752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

事实核查组织的网络已经广泛扩展,这些组织被视为应对虚假信息、错误信息或恶作剧在社会中传播的重要因素之一。尽管世界各地的事实核查组织数量继续增加,但试图了解包括印度尼西亚在内的全球南方国家存在的事实核查做法的学术研究仍然有限。本研究采用多案例研究方法,分析了已经获得国际事实核查网络(IFCN)认证的六个组织在印度尼西亚开展的事实核查实践的发展情况,即:Liputan6、Suara.com、Tirto.id、Kompas.com、Tempo.co和MAFINDO。自从大约六年前事实核查举措在印度尼西亚流行以来,我们发现印度尼西亚的事实核查组织已经发展壮大,并加强了其在全国的影响力,并与领导正在进行的反恶作剧斗争的各种全球组织网络打交道。然而,印度尼西亚事实核查组织在使事实核查方法标准化、衡量和评估其事实核查活动的“影响”以及与事实核查资源管理有关方面,仍面临若干挑战。虽然这项研究试图对印度尼西亚的事实核查组织进行概述,但仍需要用各种方法对事实核查举措进行进一步研究,以全面了解事实核查组织在印度尼西亚的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multi Case Analysis on The Development of Fact-Checking Organizations in Indonesia
The network of fact-checking organizations has expanded widely, and these organizations are seen as one of the important elements in the efforts to tackle the spread of disinformation, misinformation, or hoax in the society. Although the number of fact-checking organizations in all parts of the world continue to increase, scholarly studies which tries to capture the presence of fact-checking practices in Global South Countries, including Indonesia are still limited. This study uses a multi-case study method to analyze the development of fact-checking practices carried out by six organizations in Indonesia which already certified by the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) namely: Liputan6, Suara.com, Tirto.id, Kompas.com, Tempo.co, and MAFINDO. Since fact-checking initiatives became popular about six years ago in Indonesia, we discovered that Indonesian fact-checking organizations have grown and strengthened their presence nationally, as well as engaged with various networks of global organizations that leading the ongoing fight against hoax. However, Indonesian fact-checking organizations are still facing several challenges in the context of standardizing fact-checking methodologies, measuring and evaluating the “impact” of their fact-checking activities and related to the management of fact-checking resources. While this study attempts to contribute an overview of Indonesian fact-checking organizations, further studies on fact-checking initiatives with various methodological approaches are still needed to comprehensively look at the role of fact-checking organizations in Indonesia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Intrapersonal communication about the meaning of early marriage in Bandung City Audience consumption motives on online celebrity gossip account’s contents Framing analysis of Anies Baswedan as an Indonesian presidential candidate in the sacrificial cow numbered 024 case Communication and cultural inheritance through a traditional school in Dangiang Village, Garut Communication approach of Gopay’s digital alms platform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1