通论之路:凯恩斯、哈耶克与宏观经济学谱系

Keanu Telles DA Costa
{"title":"通论之路:凯恩斯、哈耶克与宏观经济学谱系","authors":"Keanu Telles DA Costa","doi":"10.1590/0101-31572022-3231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The criticism made by Friedrich A. Hayek to A Treatise on Money by John Maynard Keynes, and the subsequent controversy that followed with the involvement of members of the Cambridge Circus, sustained important elements to Keynes’ abandonment of his earlier ideas and to his way to General Theory. The figure and position of Hayek operated to clarify the underlying differences and the new theoretical routes for Keynes, one that was more explicitly opposite to critical authors drawing from Knut Wicksell. To some degree, the road to General Theory was paved in the famous 1931 controversy - in particular the rejection of the Wicksell connection.","PeriodicalId":35163,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Economia Politica/Brazilian Journal of Political Economy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The road to The General Theory: J. M. Keynes, F. A. Hayek, and the Genealogy of Macroeconomics\",\"authors\":\"Keanu Telles DA Costa\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0101-31572022-3231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The criticism made by Friedrich A. Hayek to A Treatise on Money by John Maynard Keynes, and the subsequent controversy that followed with the involvement of members of the Cambridge Circus, sustained important elements to Keynes’ abandonment of his earlier ideas and to his way to General Theory. The figure and position of Hayek operated to clarify the underlying differences and the new theoretical routes for Keynes, one that was more explicitly opposite to critical authors drawing from Knut Wicksell. To some degree, the road to General Theory was paved in the famous 1931 controversy - in particular the rejection of the Wicksell connection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Economia Politica/Brazilian Journal of Political Economy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Economia Politica/Brazilian Journal of Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572022-3231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Economia Politica/Brazilian Journal of Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572022-3231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

哈耶克对凯恩斯《货币论》的批判,以及随后剑桥马戏团成员的介入所引发的争论,为凯恩斯放弃其早期思想并走向《通论》提供了重要因素。哈耶克的形象和地位为凯恩斯澄清了潜在的差异和新的理论路线,这与批评作家克努特·维克塞尔(Knut Wicksell)的观点截然相反。在某种程度上,通往通论的道路是在1931年那场著名的争论中铺平的——尤其是对维克塞尔联系的否定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The road to The General Theory: J. M. Keynes, F. A. Hayek, and the Genealogy of Macroeconomics
ABSTRACT The criticism made by Friedrich A. Hayek to A Treatise on Money by John Maynard Keynes, and the subsequent controversy that followed with the involvement of members of the Cambridge Circus, sustained important elements to Keynes’ abandonment of his earlier ideas and to his way to General Theory. The figure and position of Hayek operated to clarify the underlying differences and the new theoretical routes for Keynes, one that was more explicitly opposite to critical authors drawing from Knut Wicksell. To some degree, the road to General Theory was paved in the famous 1931 controversy - in particular the rejection of the Wicksell connection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Economia Politica/Brazilian Journal of Political Economy
Revista de Economia Politica/Brazilian Journal of Political Economy Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Brazilian Journal of Political Economy/Revista de Economia Política é uma revista acadêmica, peer reviewed, bilíngue, publicada trimestralmente desde 1981 pelo Centro de Economia Política através da Editora 34. Está indexada na Scielo e no Journal of Economic Literature. É a mais citadas das revistas acadêmicas de economia do Brasil.
期刊最新文献
Fritz Redlich and the entrepreneur as God and demon Why the economy is hard to manage and how this could possibly be dealt with From the national system of technological innovation to the “New Projectment Economy” in China Growth regimes in central and peripheral countries: an econometric analysis, 1980-2018 What Have We Learned about National Development Banks? Evidence from Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1