论墙与桥:波兰跨社会的分裂与纽带

Q2 Social Sciences Sociological Focus Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI:10.1080/00380237.2021.1891160
A. Kłonkowska, Stephanie Bonvissuto
{"title":"论墙与桥:波兰跨社会的分裂与纽带","authors":"A. Kłonkowska, Stephanie Bonvissuto","doi":"10.1080/00380237.2021.1891160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Two widely recognized transgender identity formations—the medical model, which emerged from the findings of mid-twentieth-century sexologist Harry Benjamin and is reliant on incremental hormonal and surgical interventions, and the social construct model, which relies on experiential standpoint within a poststructural frame—are often considered dichotomous, even oppositional, categories within the transgender social movement. Such political positioning suggests that they operate for their adherents as adversarial Foucauldian “regimes of truth.” This is demonstrated in the following recent study of transgender persons in Poland. The findings suggest elevated fracturing tensions that may find relief through a more inclusive community model that recognizes the widest diversity of variant gender identities through an encompassing of both, and all, gendered subdivisions.","PeriodicalId":39368,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Focus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00380237.2021.1891160","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Walls and Bridges: Divisions and Bonds in the Polish Trans Community\",\"authors\":\"A. Kłonkowska, Stephanie Bonvissuto\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00380237.2021.1891160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Two widely recognized transgender identity formations—the medical model, which emerged from the findings of mid-twentieth-century sexologist Harry Benjamin and is reliant on incremental hormonal and surgical interventions, and the social construct model, which relies on experiential standpoint within a poststructural frame—are often considered dichotomous, even oppositional, categories within the transgender social movement. Such political positioning suggests that they operate for their adherents as adversarial Foucauldian “regimes of truth.” This is demonstrated in the following recent study of transgender persons in Poland. The findings suggest elevated fracturing tensions that may find relief through a more inclusive community model that recognizes the widest diversity of variant gender identities through an encompassing of both, and all, gendered subdivisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociological Focus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00380237.2021.1891160\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociological Focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2021.1891160\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2021.1891160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要两种被广泛认可的跨性别身份形成——医学模型和社会建构模型,前者来自20世纪中期性学家哈里·本杰明的发现,依赖于递增的激素和手术干预,后者依赖于后结构框架内的经验立场——通常被认为是二分的,甚至是对立的,跨性别者社会运动中的类别。这种政治定位表明,他们是作为对抗性的傅“真理政权”为追随者运作的。这一点在以下最近对波兰变性人的研究中得到了证明。研究结果表明,破裂的紧张局势加剧,可以通过一个更具包容性的社区模式来缓解这种紧张局势,该模式通过包容两个和所有性别细分领域来承认最广泛的不同性别身份多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On Walls and Bridges: Divisions and Bonds in the Polish Trans Community
ABSTRACT Two widely recognized transgender identity formations—the medical model, which emerged from the findings of mid-twentieth-century sexologist Harry Benjamin and is reliant on incremental hormonal and surgical interventions, and the social construct model, which relies on experiential standpoint within a poststructural frame—are often considered dichotomous, even oppositional, categories within the transgender social movement. Such political positioning suggests that they operate for their adherents as adversarial Foucauldian “regimes of truth.” This is demonstrated in the following recent study of transgender persons in Poland. The findings suggest elevated fracturing tensions that may find relief through a more inclusive community model that recognizes the widest diversity of variant gender identities through an encompassing of both, and all, gendered subdivisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sociological Focus
Sociological Focus Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Negotiating Ideologies: The Campaign for Gender–Balanced Boards and Commissions in Iowa Examining the Period-Based Changes in the Effect of Socioeconomic Status in Maternal Healthcare Utilization Across Regional and Residential Contexts in Postcolonial Tanzania (1991–2016) “Why Should I Be Scared?” Epidemic Uncertainties and Risk Construction in Emerging Infectious Disease Epidemics Second-Generation Decline: Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease Between African Americans and Afro Caribbeans Finding Antiracists: Construction of an Antiracism Attitude Scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1