契约法律效力的司法审查作为抵押执行拍卖的依据

D. Djunaedi, D. Wahyono, Setyawati Setyawati
{"title":"契约法律效力的司法审查作为抵押执行拍卖的依据","authors":"D. Djunaedi, D. Wahyono, Setyawati Setyawati","doi":"10.26532/jph.v8i3.18459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the executions of the mortgage object is the sale of the mortgage object through a public auction based on the executorial title contained in the Mortgage Certificate. Before the implementation is carried out by the creditor, a permit (fiat) is required by the local district court. The application for an auction for the execution of mortgage rights through a district court is closely related to obstacles, for example, a lawsuit from a third party (derden verzet) who feels he has the right to the object of execution even though it has nothing to do with creditors and debtors. This opposition made the Chief Justice of the District Court unable to grant the request for execution even though the creditor had a mortgage certificate that was encumbered but was forced to examine the relevant evidence in the trial forum to determine whether the resistance was sufficient reason or just a conspiracy with the debtor to delay the execution. Based on this explanation, the author wants to examine the legal force of the Grosse deed as the basis for the implementation of the mortgage execution auction. The type of research in writing scientific papers is a normative legal research type, with a statutory approach and a legal concept analysis approach (Analytical and Conceptual Approach). The sources of legal materials used in writing this scientific paper came from primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The legal materials were collected using library research techniques. Then analyzed using description, systematization, evaluation and finally concluded with argumentation technique. The results of this study are expected to provide scientific knowledge for academics, law enforcers, and the public.","PeriodicalId":34168,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE JURIDICAL REVIEW OF LEGAL POWER OF GROSSE DEED AS THE BASIS FOR EXECUTING MORTGAGE EXECUTION AUCTIONS\",\"authors\":\"D. Djunaedi, D. Wahyono, Setyawati Setyawati\",\"doi\":\"10.26532/jph.v8i3.18459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the executions of the mortgage object is the sale of the mortgage object through a public auction based on the executorial title contained in the Mortgage Certificate. Before the implementation is carried out by the creditor, a permit (fiat) is required by the local district court. The application for an auction for the execution of mortgage rights through a district court is closely related to obstacles, for example, a lawsuit from a third party (derden verzet) who feels he has the right to the object of execution even though it has nothing to do with creditors and debtors. This opposition made the Chief Justice of the District Court unable to grant the request for execution even though the creditor had a mortgage certificate that was encumbered but was forced to examine the relevant evidence in the trial forum to determine whether the resistance was sufficient reason or just a conspiracy with the debtor to delay the execution. Based on this explanation, the author wants to examine the legal force of the Grosse deed as the basis for the implementation of the mortgage execution auction. The type of research in writing scientific papers is a normative legal research type, with a statutory approach and a legal concept analysis approach (Analytical and Conceptual Approach). The sources of legal materials used in writing this scientific paper came from primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The legal materials were collected using library research techniques. Then analyzed using description, systematization, evaluation and finally concluded with argumentation technique. The results of this study are expected to provide scientific knowledge for academics, law enforcers, and the public.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v8i3.18459\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v8i3.18459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抵押对象的执行之一是根据抵押证书中包含的执行所有权通过公开拍卖出售抵押对象。在债权人实施之前,需要当地地方法院的许可(法令)。通过地方法院申请拍卖以执行抵押权,与债权人和债务人没有任何关系,但认为自己对执行标的拥有权利的第三人(derden verzet)的诉讼等障碍密切相关。这一反对意见使区域法院首席法官无法批准执行请求,即使债权人有一份抵押证书,但必须审查审判法庭的相关证据,以确定拒绝是充分理由,还是只是与债务人串谋拖延执行。在此基础上,笔者试图考察作为抵押执行拍卖实施依据的契约的法律效力。撰写科学论文的研究类型是规范性法律研究类型,有法定方法和法律概念分析方法(分析方法和概念方法)。撰写这篇科学论文所使用的法律资料来源来自一级法律资料、二级法律资料和三级法律资料。法律资料是利用图书馆研究技术收集的。然后运用描述法、系统化法、评价法进行分析,最后运用论证法进行总结。这项研究的结果有望为学术界、执法人员和公众提供科学知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE JURIDICAL REVIEW OF LEGAL POWER OF GROSSE DEED AS THE BASIS FOR EXECUTING MORTGAGE EXECUTION AUCTIONS
One of the executions of the mortgage object is the sale of the mortgage object through a public auction based on the executorial title contained in the Mortgage Certificate. Before the implementation is carried out by the creditor, a permit (fiat) is required by the local district court. The application for an auction for the execution of mortgage rights through a district court is closely related to obstacles, for example, a lawsuit from a third party (derden verzet) who feels he has the right to the object of execution even though it has nothing to do with creditors and debtors. This opposition made the Chief Justice of the District Court unable to grant the request for execution even though the creditor had a mortgage certificate that was encumbered but was forced to examine the relevant evidence in the trial forum to determine whether the resistance was sufficient reason or just a conspiracy with the debtor to delay the execution. Based on this explanation, the author wants to examine the legal force of the Grosse deed as the basis for the implementation of the mortgage execution auction. The type of research in writing scientific papers is a normative legal research type, with a statutory approach and a legal concept analysis approach (Analytical and Conceptual Approach). The sources of legal materials used in writing this scientific paper came from primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The legal materials were collected using library research techniques. Then analyzed using description, systematization, evaluation and finally concluded with argumentation technique. The results of this study are expected to provide scientific knowledge for academics, law enforcers, and the public.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE FOR NARCOTICS ADDICTS BASED ON LEGAL BENEFITS DEVELOPMENT OF THE HERITAGE CENTER AS BANKRUPTCY CURATOR ONE SOLUTION OF DIGITIZING LAND SERVICES TO PREVENT LAND MAFIA IN NIGERIA CONSIDERATION OF JUDGES OF THE PANDAN RELIGIOUS COURT IN DETERMINING THE STATUS OF THE DEFENDANT / INVISIBLE APPLICANT: MAQASHID AL-USRAH PERSPECTIVE THE LEGAL PROTECTION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN PEER TO PEER LENDING-BASED FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY ASPECT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1