公共外交的“逻辑”:寻找一个多学科研究领域的统一点

IF 0.9 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Hague Journal of Diplomacy Pub Date : 2023-04-13 DOI:10.1163/1871191x-bja10161
J. Pamment, Alicia Fjällhed, Martina Smedberg
{"title":"公共外交的“逻辑”:寻找一个多学科研究领域的统一点","authors":"J. Pamment, Alicia Fjällhed, Martina Smedberg","doi":"10.1163/1871191x-bja10161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nA decade ago, Matt Armstrong noted that the War on Terror set the scene for US public diplomacy (PD) to be heavily focused on security. Other countries have focused their PD on image promotion, relationship-building or cultural relations. As digital media practices have slowly been adopted by the majority of foreign ministries, the logics governing social and digital media have also been increasingly internalised into diplomatic practice. Lacking in current PD research is a theory of the ‘logics’ that drive and motivate public diplomacy. This article explores the application of ‘PD logics’ as a theoretical framework for interpreting the ways in which foreign policy priorities, such as securitisation, trade promotion and strategic partnerships, shape PD practices. With a particular focus on the most recent wave of social and digital media adoption practices, this article establishes a theory of ‘PD logics’ that could provide new avenues for developing theories of public diplomacy.","PeriodicalId":44787,"journal":{"name":"Hague Journal of Diplomacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ‘Logics’ of Public Diplomacy: In Search of What Unites a Multidisciplinary Research Field\",\"authors\":\"J. Pamment, Alicia Fjällhed, Martina Smedberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/1871191x-bja10161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nA decade ago, Matt Armstrong noted that the War on Terror set the scene for US public diplomacy (PD) to be heavily focused on security. Other countries have focused their PD on image promotion, relationship-building or cultural relations. As digital media practices have slowly been adopted by the majority of foreign ministries, the logics governing social and digital media have also been increasingly internalised into diplomatic practice. Lacking in current PD research is a theory of the ‘logics’ that drive and motivate public diplomacy. This article explores the application of ‘PD logics’ as a theoretical framework for interpreting the ways in which foreign policy priorities, such as securitisation, trade promotion and strategic partnerships, shape PD practices. With a particular focus on the most recent wave of social and digital media adoption practices, this article establishes a theory of ‘PD logics’ that could provide new avenues for developing theories of public diplomacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hague Journal of Diplomacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hague Journal of Diplomacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191x-bja10161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hague Journal of Diplomacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191x-bja10161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

十年前,马特·阿姆斯特朗指出,反恐战争为美国公共外交(PD)高度关注安全奠定了基础。其他国家将PD的重点放在形象宣传、关系建设或文化关系上。随着数字媒体实践慢慢被大多数外交部采用,管理社交和数字媒体的逻辑也越来越多地融入外交实践。在当前的公共外交研究中,缺乏一种驱动和激励公共外交的“逻辑”理论。本文探讨了“PD逻辑”的应用,作为解释外交政策优先事项(如证券化、贸易促进和战略伙伴关系)如何影响PD实践的理论框架。本文特别关注最近一波社交和数字媒体采用实践,建立了一个“PD逻辑”理论,为发展公共外交理论提供了新的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The ‘Logics’ of Public Diplomacy: In Search of What Unites a Multidisciplinary Research Field
A decade ago, Matt Armstrong noted that the War on Terror set the scene for US public diplomacy (PD) to be heavily focused on security. Other countries have focused their PD on image promotion, relationship-building or cultural relations. As digital media practices have slowly been adopted by the majority of foreign ministries, the logics governing social and digital media have also been increasingly internalised into diplomatic practice. Lacking in current PD research is a theory of the ‘logics’ that drive and motivate public diplomacy. This article explores the application of ‘PD logics’ as a theoretical framework for interpreting the ways in which foreign policy priorities, such as securitisation, trade promotion and strategic partnerships, shape PD practices. With a particular focus on the most recent wave of social and digital media adoption practices, this article establishes a theory of ‘PD logics’ that could provide new avenues for developing theories of public diplomacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hague Journal of Diplomacy
Hague Journal of Diplomacy INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
28.60%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
Diplomats as Skilful Bricoleurs of the Digital Age: EU Foreign Policy Communications from the COREU to WhatsApp Domestic Digital Diplomacy: Digital Disruption at the Macro and Micro Levels Public Diplomacy in Vietnam: National Interests and Identities in the Public Sphere, written by Vu Lam Diversity and Women’s Representation in Small States’ Diplomacy: A Case Study of Lithuania Chinese Soft Power, written by Maria Repnikova
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1