具有分类响应的回归模型的模型选择

IF 0.3 Q4 MATHEMATICS, APPLIED Journal of Applied Mathematics Statistics and Informatics Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.2478/jamsi-2022-0005
J. Kalina
{"title":"具有分类响应的回归模型的模型选择","authors":"J. Kalina","doi":"10.2478/jamsi-2022-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The multinomial logit model and the cumulative logit model represent two important tools for regression modeling with a categorical response with numerous applications in various fields. First, this paper presents a systematic review of these two models including available tools for model choice (model selection). Then, numerical experiments are presented for two real datasets with an ordinal categorical response. These experiments reveal that a backward model choice procedure by means of hypothesis testing is more effective compared to a procedure based on Akaike information criterion. While the tendency of the backward selection to be superior to Akaike information criterion has recently been justified in linear regression, such a result seems not to have been presented for models with a categorical response. In addition, we report a mistake in VGAM package of R software, which has however no influence on the process of model choice.","PeriodicalId":43016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Mathematics Statistics and Informatics","volume":"18 1","pages":"59 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model choice for regression models with a categorical response\",\"authors\":\"J. Kalina\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/jamsi-2022-0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The multinomial logit model and the cumulative logit model represent two important tools for regression modeling with a categorical response with numerous applications in various fields. First, this paper presents a systematic review of these two models including available tools for model choice (model selection). Then, numerical experiments are presented for two real datasets with an ordinal categorical response. These experiments reveal that a backward model choice procedure by means of hypothesis testing is more effective compared to a procedure based on Akaike information criterion. While the tendency of the backward selection to be superior to Akaike information criterion has recently been justified in linear regression, such a result seems not to have been presented for models with a categorical response. In addition, we report a mistake in VGAM package of R software, which has however no influence on the process of model choice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Mathematics Statistics and Informatics\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"59 - 71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Mathematics Statistics and Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/jamsi-2022-0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Mathematics Statistics and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jamsi-2022-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多项logit模型和累积logit模型是回归建模的两种重要工具,具有分类响应,在各个领域都有广泛的应用。首先,本文系统地回顾了这两个模型,包括模型选择(模型选择)的可用工具。然后,对两个具有有序分类响应的真实数据集进行了数值实验。实验结果表明,基于假设检验的后向模型选择过程比基于赤池信息准则的后向模型选择过程更有效。虽然反向选择优于赤池信息标准的趋势最近在线性回归中得到了证明,但这种结果似乎没有出现在具有分类响应的模型中。此外,我们报告了R软件的VGAM包错误,但这对模型选择过程没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Model choice for regression models with a categorical response
Abstract The multinomial logit model and the cumulative logit model represent two important tools for regression modeling with a categorical response with numerous applications in various fields. First, this paper presents a systematic review of these two models including available tools for model choice (model selection). Then, numerical experiments are presented for two real datasets with an ordinal categorical response. These experiments reveal that a backward model choice procedure by means of hypothesis testing is more effective compared to a procedure based on Akaike information criterion. While the tendency of the backward selection to be superior to Akaike information criterion has recently been justified in linear regression, such a result seems not to have been presented for models with a categorical response. In addition, we report a mistake in VGAM package of R software, which has however no influence on the process of model choice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Towards image processing of reentry event Refinement of the general form of the two-point quadrature formulas via convexity Survival analysis of cancer patients using a new Lomax Rayleigh distribution Credit risk analysis using boosting methods Parameterized Simpson-like inequalities for differentiable Bounded and Lipschitzian functions with application example from management science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1