“思想市场”后假新闻管理的法律困境

Komunikator Pub Date : 2021-11-13 DOI:10.18196/jkm.12782
Zou Ju, Zhou Yue
{"title":"“思想市场”后假新闻管理的法律困境","authors":"Zou Ju, Zhou Yue","doi":"10.18196/jkm.12782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ‘marketplace of ideas’ metaphor has gone over a whole century since its birth, and its significance is far-reaching. The protection of freedom of speech in its theory is now manifested as high tolerance of fake news. Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Singapore, Russia, and Malaysia are among the countries attempting to address the worldwide issue of false news. Many nations have included false news regulation into necessary measures such as government management and even legal systems, as can be shown. In the United States, it is difficult to control fake news by legal means, which can only be exerted through extremely limited litigation liability and industry self-discipline. In addition, the transformation of media technology has destroyed the theoretical basis of the ‘marketplace of ideas’. Due to the struggle between the two parties in the United States, fake news has become a ‘floating signifier’ and a discourse tool to attack political opponents. The century-old theory of ‘marketplace of ideas’ is in urgent need of reflection and reconstruction. ","PeriodicalId":33673,"journal":{"name":"Komunikator","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal Dilemma of Fake News Management after ‘Marketplace of Ideas’\",\"authors\":\"Zou Ju, Zhou Yue\",\"doi\":\"10.18196/jkm.12782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ‘marketplace of ideas’ metaphor has gone over a whole century since its birth, and its significance is far-reaching. The protection of freedom of speech in its theory is now manifested as high tolerance of fake news. Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Singapore, Russia, and Malaysia are among the countries attempting to address the worldwide issue of false news. Many nations have included false news regulation into necessary measures such as government management and even legal systems, as can be shown. In the United States, it is difficult to control fake news by legal means, which can only be exerted through extremely limited litigation liability and industry self-discipline. In addition, the transformation of media technology has destroyed the theoretical basis of the ‘marketplace of ideas’. Due to the struggle between the two parties in the United States, fake news has become a ‘floating signifier’ and a discourse tool to attack political opponents. The century-old theory of ‘marketplace of ideas’ is in urgent need of reflection and reconstruction. \",\"PeriodicalId\":33673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Komunikator\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Komunikator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18196/jkm.12782\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Komunikator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18196/jkm.12782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“思想市场”隐喻自诞生以来已经走过了整整一个世纪,其意义深远。其理论中对言论自由的保护现在表现为对假新闻的高度容忍。德国、法国、英国、新加坡、俄罗斯和马来西亚等国正试图解决世界范围内的虚假新闻问题。可以看出,许多国家已经将虚假新闻监管纳入政府管理甚至法律体系等必要措施。在美国,法律手段很难控制假新闻,只能通过极其有限的诉讼责任和行业自律来发挥。此外,媒体技术的转型破坏了“思想市场”的理论基础。由于美国两党之间的斗争,假新闻已经成为一种“漂浮的能指”和攻击政治对手的话语工具。有百年历史的“思想市场”理论亟待反思和重建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Legal Dilemma of Fake News Management after ‘Marketplace of Ideas’
The ‘marketplace of ideas’ metaphor has gone over a whole century since its birth, and its significance is far-reaching. The protection of freedom of speech in its theory is now manifested as high tolerance of fake news. Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Singapore, Russia, and Malaysia are among the countries attempting to address the worldwide issue of false news. Many nations have included false news regulation into necessary measures such as government management and even legal systems, as can be shown. In the United States, it is difficult to control fake news by legal means, which can only be exerted through extremely limited litigation liability and industry self-discipline. In addition, the transformation of media technology has destroyed the theoretical basis of the ‘marketplace of ideas’. Due to the struggle between the two parties in the United States, fake news has become a ‘floating signifier’ and a discourse tool to attack political opponents. The century-old theory of ‘marketplace of ideas’ is in urgent need of reflection and reconstruction. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Climate Change in Indonesian National Online Media Coverage: Agenda Setting and Sentiment Analysis Precarization of Young Indonesian Journalists During the Covid-19 Pandemic Nigerian Agricultural Posts on Facebook and Instagram within the West African Agricultural Messaging Framework A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Developing Music as A Foundation for Health Communication Utilizing YouTube for The Local Film Culture Expansion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1