监狱规划对累犯的影响

Logan M. Lee
{"title":"监狱规划对累犯的影响","authors":"Logan M. Lee","doi":"10.1080/23774657.2017.1399095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Prison programming is expensive. From 2009-2011, Iowa spent more than $24 million on prison programming with many of those programs directly designed to reduce recidivism. Unfortunately, understanding whether these programs actually reduce recidivism is complicated by prisoners’ ability to select into program participation and completion. This paper uses an innovative method to estimate program impacts. Specifically, the sample is limited to prisoners that either participated in a given program or were eligible but did not participate due to factors beyond their control. Among this sample, nearest neighbor matching is used to evaluate the impact of 16 prison program categories on recidivism. No prison program consistently improved recidivism outcomes in Iowa during the period of analysis.","PeriodicalId":91861,"journal":{"name":"Corrections : policy, practice and research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23774657.2017.1399095","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Prison Programming on Recidivism\",\"authors\":\"Logan M. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23774657.2017.1399095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Prison programming is expensive. From 2009-2011, Iowa spent more than $24 million on prison programming with many of those programs directly designed to reduce recidivism. Unfortunately, understanding whether these programs actually reduce recidivism is complicated by prisoners’ ability to select into program participation and completion. This paper uses an innovative method to estimate program impacts. Specifically, the sample is limited to prisoners that either participated in a given program or were eligible but did not participate due to factors beyond their control. Among this sample, nearest neighbor matching is used to evaluate the impact of 16 prison program categories on recidivism. No prison program consistently improved recidivism outcomes in Iowa during the period of analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corrections : policy, practice and research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23774657.2017.1399095\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corrections : policy, practice and research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2017.1399095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corrections : policy, practice and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2017.1399095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

监狱规划是昂贵的。从2009年到2011年,爱荷华州在监狱项目上花费了2400多万美元,其中许多项目的直接目的是减少再犯。不幸的是,了解这些项目是否真的能减少再犯是很复杂的,因为囚犯选择参与和完成项目的能力。本文采用了一种创新的方法来评估项目影响。具体来说,样本仅限于参加特定项目的囚犯,或者是符合条件但由于无法控制的因素而没有参加的囚犯。在此样本中,使用最近邻匹配来评估16个监狱项目类别对再犯的影响。在分析期间,爱荷华州没有监狱项目能够持续改善累犯率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of Prison Programming on Recidivism
ABSTRACT Prison programming is expensive. From 2009-2011, Iowa spent more than $24 million on prison programming with many of those programs directly designed to reduce recidivism. Unfortunately, understanding whether these programs actually reduce recidivism is complicated by prisoners’ ability to select into program participation and completion. This paper uses an innovative method to estimate program impacts. Specifically, the sample is limited to prisoners that either participated in a given program or were eligible but did not participate due to factors beyond their control. Among this sample, nearest neighbor matching is used to evaluate the impact of 16 prison program categories on recidivism. No prison program consistently improved recidivism outcomes in Iowa during the period of analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hands-Off or Hands-On? Examining the Effect of Court Orders on Inmate Misconduct Gender-Responsive Programming for Women in the Community Corrections Context: A Scoping Review Receptivity to Jail-based medication for opioid use disorder among rural detention Administrators The Interplay Between Physical Activity and Psychological, Social, and Perceived Health in Juvenile Corrections Facilities Gender and the Release from Jail: Predicting the Likelihood of a Probation Violation versus a New Offense
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1